Copyright
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Feb 16, 2026; 18(2): 116000
Published online Feb 16, 2026. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v18.i2.116000
Published online Feb 16, 2026. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v18.i2.116000
Table 1 Features of through-the-scope clips
| Feature | Importance |
| Open width | Determines the width of tissue grasp; distance between the distal teeth when the clip is opened to the maximum |
| Stem/tail length | Affects reach, especially in deeper lesions; also important to consider on narrow areas |
| Rotatability | Allows precise positioning |
| Overshoot | Rotation exceeding 30 degrees after stopping |
| Open-close mechanism | Allows repositioning of clips prior to deployment |
| Tensile strength | Grasp of the clip to the apposed mucosa |
Table 2 Limitations of through-the-scope clips
| Limitation | Description |
| Mechanical factors | |
| Shallow bite with mucosal capture only | Scarred or edematous bases (e.g., fibrotic ulcers, post-ESD beds) reduce tissue grip, so closure or hemostasis may be unreliable - particularly for larger defects (> 10-15 mm) or tangential targets. In these settings, OTSC or suturing may be preferable than TTS[10,61] |
| Device or handling constraints | Some TTS clips are one-shot at deployment (limited recapture) and with imprecise rotational control. Likewise, multiple clips increase time, cost, and lumen clutter, hindering additional therapy[2,11] |
| Misfires resulting to technical and safety risks | Misfires resulting to opposite-wall capture or serosal injury can occur with off-axis closure. In addition, accessories may be entrapped (e.g., loop/snare) or mucosa torn if traction is applied after partial closure |
| Clip migration and dwell time variability | Clips usually detach within weeks (animal and clinical data often cite 1-4 weeks), but prolonged retention can occur (reports up to 3-5 years), which may also create MRI-compatibility considerations depending on the clip[14,62-64] |
| Lesion factors | |
| Difficult access or angle | Locations such as the cardia, lesser curve, and posterior duodenal wall limit perpendicular apposition and precise jaw placement; long/looped positions also cause suboptimal rotation[2] |
| Brisk bleeding and clot burden | Active arterial bleeding can obscure the field and prevent adequate tissue capture; thermocoagulation or combination therapy is preferred when clip compression alone is insufficient[2,11,34] |
| Large vessels and wide defects | Clip compressive force may be inadequate for thick-caliber bleeding vessels or defects > 1-2 cm, where OTSC or even suturing has higher durable success[10,61] |
| Performance in specific etiologies | For colonic diverticular bleeding, meta-analyses show higher early rebleeding with clipping vs EBL, underscoring TTS limitations in these types of lesions[35] |
Table 3 Steps in deployment of an over-the-scope clip
| Steps | Ovesco clip (Ovesco Endoscopy) | Padlock (STERIS) |
| Set up the device | Attach hand wheel to biopsy port; inspect cap/clip and release thread | Attach external trigger/cable; inspect cap/clip; and confirm trigger function |
| Mount the cap on the endoscope and route actuation | Preload clip on transparent cap; route release thread through the working channel to hand wheel | Preload clip on cap; route actuation cable externally, leaving the working channel free |
| Prepare target site | Irrigate and adequately visualize the lesion | Same as Ovesco |
| Orient correctly | Center the lesion near the working-channel. Advance with cap over target; adjust torque or insufflation for a perpendicular approach | Same as Ovesco |
| Capture tissue | Use suction and/or Anchor or Twin Grasper; draw edges into cap | Use suction and grasping device via free channel to pull edges into cap more easily |
| Fire the clip | Rotate hand wheel to tension thread and deploy (similar to esophageal variceal band ligation mechanism) | Squeeze external trigger to deploy; no channel thread |
| Verify closure | Confirm apposition and hemostasis; irrigate or gently probe with a water jet | Same as Ovesco |
| Know when to escalate | If closure or hemostasis incomplete, add thermal/adjunct clips or place a second OTSC; consider suturing | Same as Ovesco |
Table 4 Examples of clinical scenarios and approach to clipping
| Clinical scenario | Recommended approach to clipping |
| Oozing ulcer-base bleeding | Optimize visualization with irrigation and/or dilute epinephrine. Apply a reopenable TTS clip to the culprit vessel. Combine with thermal or inject-and-clip therapy if the base is fibrotic. Escalate after 2-3 well-placed clips without control[8] |
| Hemostasis in narrow-lumen anatomy or pediatrics | Use short-stem clips (e.g., Steris, MicroTech). Maintain modest insufflation, and take small incremental grasps to avoid opposite-wall capture. Confirm blanching before clip release[17,18] |
| Small perforation closure | Clear the target area. Perform an edge-to-center zipper closure with high-force, reopenable TTS clips in small, perpendicular bites. Escalate early to OTSC if closure remains incomplete[78] |
| Closure after EMR/ESD | Perform an edge-to-center zipper closure using reopenable, rotatable, high-force clips. For wide defects, pre-approximate with MANTIS or DAT and complete with long-span clips. The ROLM technique using clip with eyelet and nylon line may aid closure of large defects[79]. Consider prophylactic closure in the duodenum or cecum. Escalate to OTSC or suturing if closure is suboptimal[7,78] |
| Training or general use | Prioritize reopenable, rotatable clips that tolerate multiple repositioning. Use a standardized checklist: Target centered, perpendicular approach, suction-assisted grasp, blanching confirmed before release, and adhere to stop rules[17] |
- Citation: Aguila EJT, Lau LHS, Li JW, Berzin TM. Endoscopic clip systems for hemostasis and defect closure in gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2026; 18(2): 116000
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v18/i2/116000.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v18.i2.116000
