Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Dec 16, 2025; 17(12): 115008
Published online Dec 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i12.115008
Published online Dec 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i12.115008
Table 1 Comparison of endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, and endoscopic full-thickness resection in the management of large colorectal lesions
| EMR | ESD | EFTR | |
| Indication | First-line for most non-malignant polyps; en-bloc best ≤ 20 mm; piecemeal EMR for ≥ 20 mm lesions | En bloc resection is not feasible with EMR; LST-NG; Kudo VI-type pit pattern; shallow SM invasion; large depressed tumors; large protruded lesions; mucosal tumors with submucosal fibrosis; sporadic localized tumors in conditions of chronic inflammation, such as ulcerative colitis; residual or recurrent early carcinomas after endoscopic resection | Best for difficult non-lifting lesions; fibrotic lesions; residual or recurrent adenoma; small subepithelial lesions. Ideal for lesions up to 30 mm |
| En-bloc resection rate | Low for large lesions; en bloc resection is rare in lesions ≥ 20 mm, most are piecemeal | High: 89%-97% | High: 94% |
| R0 (complete) resection | Lower; hard to assess after piecemeal | Higher in expert hands; pooled: 75%-85% | Good (84%) if the lesion is fully captured within the cap |
| Local recurrence | Historically, 10%-30%; decreased (5%) with margin thermal ablation techniques | < 2%-5% when R0 is achieved | Very low when complete EFTR is achieved |
| Perforation risk | Low: 0.5%-3% | Higher: Approximately 4% (up to 7%-10% in some series) | Intrinsic to the technique, but closed OTSC simultaneously |
| Procedure time/resources | Shorter, outpatient; widely available | Longer, technically complex; limited to expert centers | Faster than ESD; however, device-specific training is needed |
| Limitations | Piecemeal, higher recurrence, and poor margin assessment | Steep learning curve, higher perforation risk, limited availability | Size limits ≤ 20-25 mm; not ideal for > 3 cm; evidence mostly observational |
- Citation: Bagrodia A, Vaithiyam V, Laguduva Mohan S. Large colorectal lesions: Expanding the boundaries of endoscopic management. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(12): 115008
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v17/i12/115008.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i12.115008
