Unsuspected efficacy of starch-based polysaccharide vs crystalloid-oil emulsion for lifting in colonic endoscopic resections

doi:10.4253/wjge.v17.i9.109396

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 17, Issue 9

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (231)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-1) series, Tables (1-5) series.

Item

Count

PDF

HTML

Figures (1-1)

Tables (1-5)

Sum=31

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

183

Download

Sum=197

Sep 16, 2025 (publication date) through Sep 15, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (0)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

ISSN

1948-5190

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

World J Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 16, 2025; 17(9): 109396
Published online Sep 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i9.109396

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 Subgroup analyses based on the lesion size. A: Outcome comparison in < 2 cm sized polyps; B: Outcome comparison in ≥ 2 cm sized polyps; C: Outcome comparison in ≥ 4 cm sized polyps. ^aP < 0.05 (statistically significant). COES: Crystalloid-oil emulsion solution; NS: Not significant; SPS: Starch-based polysaccharide solution.

Citation: Kahlon S, Alsamman A, Desai J, Urayama S. Unsuspected efficacy of starch-based polysaccharide vs crystalloid-oil emulsion for lifting in colonic endoscopic resections. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(9): 109396
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v17/i9/109396.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i9.109396