Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jun 16, 2025; 17(6): 104234
Published online Jun 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i6.104234
Published online Jun 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i6.104234
Figure 1 Study overview.
PPIs: Proton pump inhibitors; PCABs: Potassium competitive acid blockers; EGD: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Figure 2 Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
GI: Gastrointestinal; ESD: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy; NVUGIB: Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Figure 3 Study flowchart.
NVUGIB: Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding; PPI: Proton pump inhibitor; PCAB: Potassium competitive acid blocker.
Figure 4 Comparison of outcomes between groups who received either proton pump inhibitor or potassium competitive acid blocker therapy.
PCAB: Potassium competitive acid blocker; PPI: Proton pump inhibitor.
- Citation: Lim NR, Chung WC. Intravenous proton pump inhibitors vs oral potassium competitive acid blockers before endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(6): 104234
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v17/i6/104234.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i6.104234