Published online Oct 16, 2018. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i10.308
Peer-review started: April 28, 2018
First decision: May 18, 2018
Revised: July 13, 2018
Accepted: August 26, 2018
Article in press: August 27, 2018
Published online: October 16, 2018
Processing time: 171 Days and 10.9 Hours
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is currently the standard technique for treating choledocholithiasis and associated complications, such as cholangitis, biliary pancreatitis, and biliary stricture, in the non-pregnant population. The approach in pregnant women with suspected choledocholithiasis, however, differs somewhat from that for non-pregnant patients because of concerns about the pregnant mother and the fetus, including procedure time, teratogenicity of intraprocedural medications, and fetal radiation exposure.
This work systematically collates the clinical data from the clinical studies, including the numerous small clinical series, to render these data accessible to clinicians. This work provides a systematic review of the rapidly evolving literature in this clinically booming field to provide highly important and clinically relevant updates on ERCP safety, efficacy, and recent technical improvements in pregnant patients.
This work reports numerous techniques to reduce radiation exposure and other safety precautions to decrease fetal risk from ERCP during pregnancy. Indeed, this work discusses in detail radiation free ERCP during pregnancy to completely eliminate teratogenic risks of radiation.
This review encompassed more than 500 cases published in small clinical series and scattered reports, in addition to 58 cases recently reported in a retrospective Swedish registry study.
This work focuses on techniques to improve ERCP safety during pregnancy, including analysis of the relatively recently introduced radiation-free ERCP to completely eliminate the potential for radiation teratogenicity. Radiation-free ERCP is shown to be a relatively safe, and efficacious technique. However, more clinical data are required on this promising technique.
This work shows that therapeutic ERCP is a reasonably safe therapy for the mother and the fetus during pregnancy, and it should be performed when indicated for symptomatic choledocholithiasis and its associated complications (including ascending cholangitis, gallstone pancreatitis, and biliary stricture) during pregnancy. This work confirms that solely diagnostic ERCP should generally not be performed during pregnancy due to the risks of fetal radiation teratogenesis and induction of early labor, and should be replaced by diagnostic MRCP or endoscopic ultrasound. ERCP should not be performed during pregnancy for asymptomatic stones because of potential fetal risks; ERCPs can often be delayed to postpartum because patients have minimal clinical findings, or patients can directly undergo cholecystectomy during pregnancy without antecedent ERCP for acute cholecystitis.
More data are needed on radiation-free ERCPs. This work describes technique modifications for therapeutic ERCP during pregnancy to improve procedural safety. It is hoped that clinicians adapt these technique modifications during ERCP to further improve ERCP safety and efficacy during pregnancy.