BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Editorial
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Hepatol. Jul 27, 2026; 18(7): 116709
Published online Jul 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.116709
Table 1 Comparative strategic utility of magnetic resonance imaging-functional liver imaging score vs contrast-enhanced ultrasound
Modality
Parameter
Strategic strength
Clinical constraint
MRI-Functional Liver Imaging ScoreUptake (organic anion-transporting polypeptides), excretion (multidrug resistance associated protein 2), and portal flowComprehensive assessment of cellular health and reserve[2,4,21]High cost; inter-scanner variability; renal contraindications[6,8]
MRI-hepatic enhancementSegment VI quantitative signal intensityObjective and continuous metric; strong mortality predictor[1]Logistical complexity; manual regions of interest placement; single-center limits[1]
Contrast-enhanced ultrasoundHepatic vein arrival time and transit timesReal-time microvascular profiling; bedside-ready; low cost[10,15,18]Operator-dependent; no hepatocyte-specific phase[19,20]


Write to the Help Desk