Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Hepatol. Jun 27, 2026; 18(6): 119837
Published online Jun 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.119837
Published online Jun 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.119837
Table 1 Phase-dependent interpretation of quantitative hepatitis b surface antigen for hepatocellular carcinoma risk stratification
| Disease phase | Typical qHBsAg | Primary HBsAg source | The qHBsAg-HCC association | Key evidence | Clinical action beyond guidelines | Ref. |
| HBeAg-positive chronic infection | > 10000 IU/mL | cccDNA (replication-driven) | Inverse or neutral; higher HBsAg associated with delayed HCC | ERADICATE-B/REVEAL-HBV (n = 6139; 21.7 years f/u): HBsAg ≥ 10000 associated with delayed HCC in HBeAg-positive | The qHBsAg not recommended; HBV DNA is dominant predictor | Kumada et al[1], Tseng et al[4], Yang et al[6] |
| HBeAg-negative, low viremia (DNA < 2000 IU/mL) | 100 to > 1000 IU/mL | Integrated HBV DNA | Strongly positive; HR 13.7 (4.8-39.3) for ≥ 1000 vs < 1000 | ERADICATE-B (n = 2688; 14.7 years); Shanghai OR 2.21 (1.10-4.43); meta-analysis OR 2.46 (2.15-2.83) | Measure qHBsAg; if ≥ 1000 sustained ≥ 1 year: Enhanced surveillance and consider treatment | Seto et al[2], Terrault et al[3], Tseng et al[4] |
| Indeterminate phase (“grey zone“) | Variable | Mixed | Positive; biomarkers stratify heterogeneous risk | HBcrAg stratified risk (HR = 4.47, 2.62-7.63); annual HCC 0.32% | The qHBsAg > 1000 may identify higher-risk subset | Tseng et al[4], Ghany et al[25] |
| Intermediate viremia (DNA 2000-20000 IU/mL) | Variable | Mixed | Attenuated; HBcrAg may be more informative | HBcrAg ≥ 10 KU/mL: HR = 6.29 (2.27-17.48) | Modest adjunctive value; HBcrAg preferred | Zhao et al[23] |
| High viremia (DNA > 20000 IU/mL) | > 10000 IU/mL | cccDNA | Neutral; HBV DNA dominates | REVEAL-HBV: HR of 10.7 for DNA ≥ 200000 vs undetectable | The qHBsAg not recommended; manage per guidelines | Yucuma et al[5], Grudda et al[9] |
| Cirrhosis/advanced fibrosis (F3-F4) | Variable | Variable | Neutral; fibrosis dominates | Annual HCC 3%-5%; AASLD recommends surveillance for all | Fibrosis supersedes viral biomarkers | Tseng et al[4], Mahajan et al[8] |
Table 2 Implementation barriers and proposed solutions for quantitative hepatitis b surface antigen-guided risk stratification
| Barrier | Details | Proposed solution |
| Cost | $50-$100 per test | Targeted testing in higher-risk subgroups (age > 50, family history of HCC, ≥ F2 fibrosis) |
| Insurance coverage | Not covered in some regions | Advocate for coverage in high-risk subgroups (HBeAg-negative, low viremia) |
| Accessibility | Not available in low-resource settings where HBV burden is highest | Point-of-care qHBsAg tests in development; advocate for technology transfer[40] |
| Assay standardization | Different absolute values across platforms (Abbott, Roche, Siemens) | Use same platform for serial monitoring; cross-platform calibration studies needed |
| Clinician training | Unfamiliarity with phase-dependent interpretation | Educational materials and clinical decision aids |
| Turnaround time | Results may take days | Not suitable for same-day decisions; plan testing at routine visits |
| Genotype applicability | Cutoffs validated only for genotypes B and C | Prospective validation in non-Asian populations required before broad adoption[3,40] |
- Citation: Omari Y, Almeqdadi M. Phase-dependent interpretation of quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatocellular carcinoma risk in chronic hepatitis B infection. World J Hepatol 2026; 18(6): 119837
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v18/i6/119837.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.119837