Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Hepatol. May 27, 2026; 18(5): 119798
Published online May 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i5.119798
Published online May 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i5.119798
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the training and validation datasets, n (%)/median (interquartile range)
| Variables | Training set (n = 768) | Validation set (n = 330) | P values |
| Gender (male/female) | Male 473 (61.6) | Male 211 (63.9) | 0.50 |
| Female 295 (38.4%) | Female 119 (36.1%) | ||
| Age (years) | 36.00 (30.00, 44.25) | 37.00 (30.25, 45.75) | 0.56 |
| Weight (kg) | 61.00 (53.00, 69.00) | 61.80 (54.00, 69.00) | 0.85 |
| Height (cm) | 167.00 (160.00, 171.00) | 168.00 (160.00, 173.00) | 0.27 |
| Hepatitis B virus DNA (log10 IU/mL) | 5.90 (3.78, 7.63) | 6.14 (3.56, 7.62) | 0.59 |
| Hepatitis B surface antigen (log10 IU/mL) | 3.59 (3.07, 4.22) | 3.57 (3.04, 4.32) | 0.76 |
| Hepatitis B surface antibody (mIU/mL) | 0.19 (0.00, 1.10) | 0.10 (0.00, 1.00) | 0.21 |
| Hepatitis B e antigen (COI) | 0.59 (0.11, 700.00) | 0.50 (0.17, 700.00) | 0.86 |
| Hepatitis B e antibody (COI) | 0.32 (0.01, 13.39) | 0.22 (0.01, 7.99) | 0.26 |
| Hepatitis B core antibody (COI) | 7.95 (0.01, 9.27) | 7.66 (0.01, 9.35) | 0.71 |
| White blood cell (109/L) | 5.30 (4.50, 6.20) | 5.30 (4.40, 6.10) | 0.84 |
| Neutrophil Abs. count (109/L) | 2.90 (2.40, 3.60) | 3.00 (2.40, 3.70) | 0.45 |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | 145.00 (132.00, 155.25) | 146.00 (132.25, 156.00) | 0.67 |
| Platelet (109/L) | 202.00 (168.00, 239.00) | 195.00 (165.00, 229.00) | 0.02 |
| Prothrombin time (seconds) | 13.10 (12.62, 13.70) | 13.10 (12.60, 13.70) | 0.91 |
| International normalized ratio | 1.01 (0.97, 1.06) | 1.02 (0.97, 1.06) | 0.62 |
| Albumin (g/L) | 44.00 (42.00, 46.00) | 44.00 (42.00, 46.00) | 0.52 |
| Globulin (g/L) | 31.00 (28.00, 34.00) | 30.00 (27.00, 34.00) | 0.62 |
| Total bilirubin (μmol/L) | 16.05 (11.80, 21.50) | 15.50 (12.10, 21.10) | 0.88 |
| Direct bilirubin (μmol/L) | 4.85 (3.00, 7.20) | 4.80 (2.90, 7.47) | 0.92 |
| Alanine aminotransferase (U/L) | 68.00 (44.00, 116.00) | 68.00 (47.00, 118.00) | 0.65 |
| Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L) | 49.00 (27.75, 94.00) | 44.00 (25.00, 89.75) | 0.17 |
| Gamma-glutamyl transferase (U/L) | 33.00 (21.00, 62.00) | 31.50 (21.00, 56.00) | 0.44 |
| Alkaline phosphatase (U/L) | 63.00 (33.00, 83.00) | 61.00 (31.25, 81.00) | 0.64 |
| Alpha-fetoprotein (ng/mL) | 2.95 (1.75, 5.55) | 2.79 (1.82, 4.64) | 0.51 |
| Liver stiffness measurement (kPa) | 7.40 (5.60, 10.60) | 7.30 (5.50, 10.20) | 0.70 |
Table 2 Detailed model performance metrics for liver fibrosis diagnostic models
| Metric | Liver stiffness-platelet ratio index | Fibrosis-4 | AST to platelet ratio index | Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to platelet ratio | S-Index | Hui model | Age-male-ALP-platelets risk score | AST to platelet and age-gender model |
| Training data | ||||||||
| AUROC | 0.84 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.71 |
| 95%CI lower | 0.80 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.66 |
| 95%CI upper | 0.87 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.75 |
| UA | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.09 |
| Matthews correlation coefficient | 0.46 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.33 | 0.27 | 0.31 |
| Youden index (%) | 52.96 | 20.38 | 22.87 | 28.58 | 30.00 | 37.87 | 31.13 | 33.25 |
| PPV (%) | 47.55 | 40.56 | 32.08 | 40.39 | 36.54 | 40.29 | 38.04 | 44.83 |
| NPV (%) | 92.53 | 80.44 | 85.04 | 83.43 | 85.78 | 88.08 | 85.52 | 84.33 |
| Sensitivity (%) | 82.45 | 38.83 | 72.87 | 54.79 | 68.62 | 72.87 | 65.96 | 55.32 |
| Specificity (%) | 70.52 | 81.55 | 50.00 | 73.79 | 61.38 | 65.00 | 65.17 | 77.93 |
| Accuracy (%) | 73.44 | 71.09 | 55.60 | 69.14 | 63.15 | 66.93 | 65.36 | 72.40 |
| TP (%) | 20.18 | 9.51 | 17.84 | 13.41 | 16.80 | 17.84 | 16.15 | 13.54 |
| Validation data | ||||||||
| AUROC | 0.83 | 0.65 | 0.61 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.73 |
| 95%CI lower | 0.78 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.67 |
| 95%CI upper | 0.88 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.80 |
| UA | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Matthews correlation coefficient | 0.43 | 0.23 | 0.08 | 0.30 | 0.26 | 0.29 | 0.26 | 0.30 |
| Youden index (%) | 49.65 | 23.45 | 9.26 | 31.74 | 30.02 | 33.75 | 30.02 | 31.72 |
| PPV (%) | 44.97 | 41.67 | 27.91 | 44.00 | 36.60 | 37.50 | 36.60 | 44.79 |
| NPV (%) | 92.22 | 81.22 | 78.98 | 83.84 | 85.80 | 87.57 | 85.80 | 83.69 |
| Sensitivity (%) | 82.72 | 43.21 | 59.26 | 54.32 | 69.14 | 74.07 | 69.14 | 53.09 |
| Specificity (%) | 66.94 | 80.24 | 50.00 | 77.42 | 60.89 | 59.68 | 60.89 | 78.63 |
| accuracy (%) | 70.82 | 71.12 | 52.28 | 71.73 | 62.92 | 63.22 | 62.92 | 72.34 |
| TP (%) | 20.36 | 10.64 | 14.59 | 13.37 | 17.02 | 18.24 | 17.02 | 13.07 |
Table 3 Performance of machine learning and deep learning models with 26 features and liver stiffness-platelet ratio index + 26 features on imbalanced dataset
| Models | Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve | Youden | Positive predictive value (%) | Negative predictive value (%) | Accuracy (%) | True positives (n) | False positive (n) | True negative (n) | False negative (n) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
| Using 26 features | |||||||||||
| LogisticRegression | 0.85 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.92 | 0.80 | 41.40 | 31.60 | 134.00 | 12.40 | 0.77 | 0.81 |
| SVM | 0.83 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.91 | 0.79 | 40.40 | 33.40 | 132.20 | 13.40 | 0.75 | 0.80 |
| NuSVC | 0.81 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.91 | 0.76 | 41.40 | 40.80 | 124.80 | 12.40 | 0.77 | 0.75 |
| DecisionTree | 0.70 | 0.40 | 0.54 | 0.85 | 0.77 | 29.80 | 25.60 | 140.00 | 24.00 | 0.55 | 0.85 |
| ExtraTree | 0.63 | 0.27 | 0.44 | 0.82 | 0.72 | 24.80 | 32.00 | 133.60 | 29.00 | 0.46 | 0.81 |
| GaussianNB | 0.80 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.89 | 0.77 | 38.20 | 35.80 | 129.80 | 15.60 | 0.71 | 0.78 |
| GradientBoosting | 0.88 | 0.63 | 0.60 | 0.93 | 0.82 | 43.20 | 29.00 | 136.60 | 10.60 | 0.80 | 0.82 |
| HistGradientBoosting | 0.87 | 0.62 | 0.55 | 0.94 | 0.79 | 45.20 | 37.00 | 128.60 | 8.60 | 0.84 | 0.78 |
| AdaBoost | 0.86 | 0.61 | 0.54 | 0.95 | 0.78 | 46.20 | 41.60 | 124.00 | 7.60 | 0.86 | 0.75 |
| RandomForest | 0.87 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.93 | 0.81 | 44.00 | 32.00 | 133.60 | 9.80 | 0.82 | 0.81 |
| KNeighbors | 0.77 | 0.43 | 0.47 | 0.89 | 0.72 | 38.00 | 46.40 | 119.20 | 15.80 | 0.71 | 0.72 |
| KAN | 0.83 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.91 | 0.79 | 40.80 | 34.20 | 131.40 | 13.00 | 0.76 | 0.79 |
| NeuralNetwork | 0.84 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.92 | 0.78 | 42.80 | 36.80 | 128.80 | 11.00 | 0.80 | 0.78 |
| Using liver stiffness-platelet ratio index + 26 features | |||||||||||
| LogisticRegression | 0.85 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.91 | 0.81 | 40.80 | 29.00 | 136.60 | 13.00 | 0.76 | 0.82 |
| SVM | 0.83 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.91 | 0.78 | 41.00 | 34.80 | 130.80 | 12.80 | 0.76 | 0.79 |
| NuSVC | 0.81 | 0.53 | 0.54 | 0.91 | 0.77 | 40.40 | 37.20 | 128.40 | 13.40 | 0.75 | 0.78 |
| DecisionTree | 0.67 | 0.35 | 0.51 | 0.84 | 0.76 | 26.80 | 25.00 | 140.60 | 27.00 | 0.50 | 0.85 |
| ExtraTree | 0.66 | 0.32 | 0.48 | 0.83 | 0.75 | 26.40 | 28.40 | 137.20 | 27.40 | 0.49 | 0.83 |
| GaussianNB | 0.81 | 0.52 | 0.58 | 0.89 | 0.80 | 37.20 | 27.80 | 137.80 | 16.60 | 0.69 | 0.83 |
| GradientBoosting | 0.87 | 0.62 | 0.56 | 0.94 | 0.80 | 44.80 | 34.80 | 130.80 | 9.00 | 0.83 | 0.79 |
| HistGradientBoosting | 0.87 | 0.61 | 0.53 | 0.94 | 0.78 | 46.00 | 41.40 | 124.20 | 7.80 | 0.86 | 0.75 |
| AdaBoost | 0.85 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.92 | 0.80 | 42.00 | 33.00 | 132.60 | 11.80 | 0.78 | 0.80 |
| RandomForest | 0.86 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.93 | 0.82 | 43.60 | 28.80 | 136.80 | 10.20 | 0.81 | 0.83 |
| KNeighbors | 0.78 | 0.42 | 0.47 | 0.88 | 0.72 | 37.00 | 44.20 | 121.40 | 16.80 | 0.69 | 0.73 |
| KAN | 0.84 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.92 | 0.79 | 42.60 | 35.80 | 129.80 | 11.20 | 0.79 | 0.78 |
| NeuralNetwork | 0.85 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.92 | 0.81 | 41.00 | 28.80 | 136.80 | 12.80 | 0.76 | 0.83 |
- Citation: Lin JY, Ai ZX, Luo MJ, Su LZ, Gao XG, Jiang HL, Lin JQ, Zhang HY, Sun YY, Yu HT, Zhang L, Gong XQ. Liver stiffness-platelet ratio index and machine learning models for the noninvasive diagnosis of significant fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B. World J Hepatol 2026; 18(5): 119798
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v18/i5/119798.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v18.i5.119798