Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Hepatol. May 27, 2026; 18(5): 118817
Published online May 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i5.118817
Published online May 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i5.118817
Table 1 Tiered non-invasive assessment strategies for liver fibrosis and steatosis: A synthesis of international guidelines (2017-2025)
| Guideline body & Ref. | Tier 1: Initial risk stratification (screening) | Tier 2: Confirmatory/definitive assessment | Key considerations for dual HBV/MASLD etiology |
| APASL (Shiha et al[34], 2017); resource-aware, global perspective | Fibrosis: APRI or proprietary panels (e.g., FibroTest). Steatosis: Ultrasound | Fibrosis: VCTE or MRE | In resource-limited settings, a low threshold for specialist referral is needed if metabolic risk factors (T2DM, hypertension) are present, as they are strong independent drivers of fibrosis in co-infected patients[22] |
| AACE/AASLD endocrine (Cusi et al[35], 2022); high-risk metabolic patients | Fibrosis: FIB-4 index (universal screening in T2D). Steatosis: Risk factor-based | Fibrosis: (LSM by VCTE) or ELF test. Steatosis: CAP or MRI-PDFF for quantification | Endocrinologists must recognize that in patients with HBV, the presence of T2DM and hypertension should trigger aggressive fibrosis assessment, as these metabolic factors are strongly linked to significant fibrosis in this population[22] |
| EASL-EASD-EASO (European Association for the Study of the Liver et al[36], 2024); rule-out strategy in MASLD | Fibrosis: FIB-4 index (stepwise with LSM). Steatosis: Often integrated via CAP during LSM | Fibrosis: LSM by VCTE (primary), or MRE. Steatosis: CAP, MRI-PDFF | A key paradox: Low steatosis scores (e.g., CAP) should not be used to de-prioritize fibrosis evaluation. The viral component may be the dominant fibrogenic driver, necessitating elastography even with normal CAP[14,20,23] |
| AASLD practice guideline on blood-based NITs (Sterling et al[37], 2025); primary care & hepatology screening | Fibrosis: FIB-4 Index (preferred). Steatosis: Not routinely specified in Tier 1; often via risk factor assessment | Fibrosis: Imaging-based NITs (VCTE, MRE) or enhanced blood tests (ELF). Steatosis: CAP (with VCTE) or MRI-PDFF | The 2025 guideline emphasizes using NITs for risk stratification but does not specify dual-etiology cut-offs. Heightened suspicion for advanced fibrosis is warranted despite potentially mild steatosis scores[23] |
- Citation: Giangregorio F, Civaschi E, Mazzocchi S, Romano D, Clini P, Centenara E, Casale U, Catucci D. Beyond fibrosis: The imperative for dual steatosis and fibrosis assessment in chronic hepatitis B and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease co-pathology. World J Hepatol 2026; 18(5): 118817
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v18/i5/118817.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v18.i5.118817