Copyright
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Hepatol. Jan 27, 2026; 18(1): 114366
Published online Jan 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i1.114366
Published online Jan 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i1.114366
Table 1 Comparison of baseline characteristics between the intervention and control groups, n (%)/mean ± SD
| Variable | Intervention group (n = 50) | Control group (n = 50) | Test statistic | P value |
| Sex | χ2 = 1.190 | 0.275 | ||
| Male | 40 (80.00) | 44 (88.00) | ||
| Female | 10 (20.00) | 6 (12.00) | ||
| Age (years) | 51.62 ± 9.17 | 54.98 ± 8.76 | t = -1.864 | 0.065 |
| Liver function grade (Child-Pugh score) | Z = -0.157 | 0.875 | ||
| Grade A | 11 (22.00) | 13 (26.00) | ||
| Grade B | 29 (58.00) | 26 (52.00) | ||
| Grade C | 10 (20.00) | 11 (22.00) | ||
| Marital status | χ2 = 0.332 | 0.564 | ||
| Married | 42 (84.00) | 44 (88.00) | ||
| Widowed/divorced | 8 (16.00) | 6 (12.00) | ||
| Medical payment method | Z = -0.923 | 0.356 | ||
| Urban medical insurance | 8 (16.00) | 12 (24.00) | ||
| Rural medical insurance | 36 (72.00) | 33 (66.00) | ||
| Self-pay | 6 (12.00) | 5 (10.00) | ||
| Duration of cirrhosis (years) | 8.32 ± 3.43 | 8.34 ± 3.37 | t = -0.029 | 0.977 |
| Presence of pain | χ2 = 0.367 | 0.545 | ||
| Yes | 30 (60.00) | 27 (54.00) | ||
| No | 20 (40.00) | 23 (46.00) | ||
| Presence of sleep problems | χ2 = 0.407 | 0.523 | ||
| Yes | 35 (70.00) | 32 (64.00) | ||
| No | 15 (30.00) | 18 (36.00) |
Table 2 Comparison of psychological distress, anxiety, and depression scores between groups, median (interquartile range)/mean ± SD
| Group | n | Psychological distress score | Anxiety score | Depression score | |||
| Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | ||
| Intervention | 50 | 4 (4-5) | 3 (2-3) | 47.95 ± 5.33 | 41.65 ± 4.29 | 53.96 ± 4.82 | 45.79 ± 3.25 |
| Control | 50 | 4 (4-5) | 3 (3-4) | 48.54 ± 4.23 | 46.38 ± 4.18 | 53.32 ± 4.47 | 50.14 ± 3.69 |
| Z/t | Z = -0.807 | Z = -5.771 | t = -0.618 | t = -5.583 | t = 0.677 | t = -6.25 | |
| P value | 0.420 | 0.000 | 0.538 | 0.000 | 0.500 | 0.000 | |
Table 3 Pre-intervention and post-intervention quality of life comparison between two patient groups, mean ± SD/median (interquartile range)
| Group (n = 5) | Physiological domain | Psychological domain | Independence domain | Social relationships domain | Environment domain | Spiritual support/religion/personal belief | Overall quality of life score | |||||||
| Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | |
| Experimental group | 11.27 ± 1.65 | 14.40 ± 1.17 | 12.16 ± 1.52 | 14.57 ± 1.09 | 11.77 ± 1.59 | 14.08 ± 0.89 | 12.56 ± 1.05 | 13.15 ± 1.36 | 12.98 ± 1.37 | 13.34 ± 1.13 | 12 (12-13) | 13 (12-14) | 10 (10-12) | 12 (12-13) |
| Control group | 11.49 ± 1.43 | 12.37 ± 1.20 | 12.41 ± 1.19 | 13.05 ± 1.45 | 11.71 ± 1.61 | 12.11 ± 1.64 | 12.11 ± 1.29 | 12.25 ± 1.29 | 13.03 ± 0.97 | 13.13 ± 1.05 | 12 (11-13) | 12 (11-13) | 10 (9-12) | 10 (10-12) |
| Z/t | t = -0.711 | t = 8.559 | t = -0.912 | t = 5.908 | t = 0.191 | t = 7.495 | t = 0.968 | t = 3.397 | t = -0.249 | t = 0.990 | Z = -0.813 | Z = -2.744 | Z = -0.443 | Z = -6.330 |
| P value | 0.479 | 0 | 0.364 | 0 | 0.849 | 0 | 0.337 | 0.001 | 0.804 | 0.325 | 0.416 | 0.006 | 0.658 | 0 |
Table 4 Comparison of satisfaction scores for care nursing between two groups of patients, mean ± SD
| Group | Sample size | Pre-intervention | Post-intervention |
| Experimental group | 50 | 112.90 ± 6.24 | 144.28 ± 4.43 |
| Control group | 50 | 113.50 ± 7.26 | 125.78 ± 8.39 |
| t value | -0.44 | 14.23 | |
| P value | 0.66 | 0.001 |
- Citation: Xu WY, Li YQ, Wei XP, Qin HP, Feng LF. Evaluation of the impact of an interdisciplinary team scheduling model on psychological outcomes in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. World J Hepatol 2026; 18(1): 114366
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v18/i1/114366.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v18.i1.114366
