Copyright
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Hepatol. Jan 27, 2026; 18(1): 113475
Published online Jan 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i1.113475
Published online Jan 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i1.113475
Table 1 Frequencies of liver stiffness from FibroScan
| E | Counts | % of total |
| F0 | 113 | 37.7 |
| F1 | 30 | 10.0 |
| F2 | 38 | 12.7 |
| F3 | 15 | 5.0 |
| F4 | 104 | 34.6 |
Table 2 Baseline characteristics of participants, n (%)
| Characteristic | Total (n = 300) | Male (n = 237) | Female (n = 63) |
| Age (years) | 52.4 ± 11.2 | 52.1 ± 11.0 | 53.2 ± 11.8 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 28.7 ± 4.3 | 28.9 ± 4.1 | 28.1 ± 4.8 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 187 (62.3) | 149 (62.9) | 38 (60.3) |
| Hypertension | 203 (67.7) | 162 (68.4) | 41 (65.1) |
| Dyslipidemia | 245 (81.7) | 195 (82.3) | 50 (79.4) |
Table 3 Comparison of different indices by gender
| Indices | Male | Female | P value |
| FIB-4 | 1.64 (0.83-3.15) | 1.59 (0.94-2.54) | 0.560 |
| NLR | 1.90 (1.54-2.81) | 2.19 (1.12-3.21) | 0.632 |
| PLR | 142.5 (98.2-189.7) | 139.7 (102.4-178.3) | 0.781 |
| NPAR | 14.13 (12.20-17.14) | 14.04 (11.80-16.56) | 0.793 |
| APRI | 1.23 (0.25-2.21) | 1.09 (0.22-1.96) | 0.297 |
| CAP | 270.00 (223-302) | 273.00 (243.00-302.00) | 0.642 |
| Liver stiffness | 9.30 (5.40-26.80) | 4.80 (4.40-7.60) | 0.002 |
Table 4 Diagnostic performance of the indices for the differentiation of F3 and F4 from lower stages
| Indices | AUC | P value | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | DA (%) |
| FIB-4 | 0.806 | 0.000 | 0.692 | 0.804 | 72.97 | 77.36 | 75.63 |
| APRI | 0.772 | 0.000 | 0.820 | 0.627 | 62.75 | 82.05 | 71.21 |
| NLR | 0.540 | 0.512 | 0.462 | 0.706 | 54.55 | 63.16 | 60.00 |
| PLR | 0.301 | 0.001 | 0.051 | 0.980 | 66.67 | 57.47 | 58.43 |
| NPAR | 0.673 | 0.005 | 0.615 | 0.745 | 64.86 | 71.7 | 68.88 |
Table 5 Diagnostic performance of the indices for liver stiffness measurement
| Indices | AUC | P value | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV (%) | NPV (%) |
| FIB-4 | 0.806 | 0 | 0.692 | 0.804 | 72.97 | 77.36 |
| APRI | 0.772 | 0 | 0.82 | 0.627 | 62.75 | 82.05 |
| NLR | 0.54 | 0.512 | 0.462 | 0.706 | 54.55 | 63.16 |
| PLR | 0.301 | 0.001 | 0.051 | 0.98 | 66.67 | 57.47 |
| NPAR | 0.673 | 0.005 | 0.615 | 0.745 | 64.86 | 71.7 |
Table 6 Diagnostic performance of the indices for controlled attenuation parameter
| Indices | AUC | P value | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) |
| FIB-4 | 0.516 | 0.769 | 40.54 | 72.09 | 71.43 | 41.33 |
| APRI | 0.566 | 0.236 | 50.08 | 32.56 | 67.42 | 50 |
| NPAR | 0.467 | 0.553 | 16.22 | 97.67 | 92.31 | 40.38 |
| NLR | 0.474 | 0.57 | 45.34 | 92.77 | 91.58 | 40.38 |
| PLR | 0.54 | 0.388 | 58.14 | 54.05 | 59.52 | 52.63 |
Table 7 Cut-off validation against established thresholds
| Marker | Established cut-off | Our cut-off | Clinical utility |
| FIB-4 | > 1.45 (rule-out) | > 1.42 | Equivalent rule-out |
| APRI | > 0.7 (significant) | > 0.68 | Validated threshold |
| PLR | Novel marker | > 142.5 | Exploratory |
| NPAR | Novel marker | > 14.13 | Exploratory |
- Citation: Joseph A, Mathew S, Nair HR. Blood markers vs transient elastography for liver stiffness and steatosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. World J Hepatol 2026; 18(1): 113475
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v18/i1/113475.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v18.i1.113475
