Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Hepatol. Mar 27, 2025; 17(3): 104580
Published online Mar 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i3.104580
Published online Mar 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i3.104580
Table 1 Accuracy of Child Pugh vs model for end-stage liver disease in predicting decompensation
| Ref. | Study population | Patient | End point | c statistic | |
| Child-Pugh | Model for end-stage liver disease | ||||
| Kamath et al[16] | TIPS | 282 | 3-month mortality | 0.84 | 0.87 |
| Angermayr et al[17] | TIPS | 475 | 3-month mortality | 0.7 | 0.72 |
| 1-year mortality | 0.66 | 0.66 | |||
| Schepke et al[18] | TIPS | 162 | 3-month mortality | 0.67 | 0.73 |
| 1-year mortality | 0.74 | 0.73 | |||
| Botta et al[19] | Cirrhosis | 129 | 1-year mortality | 0.69 | 0.67 |
| Wiesner et al[20] | Cirrhosis, LT | 3437 | 3-month mortality | 0.76 | 0.83 |
| Degré et al[21] | Cirrhosis, LT | 137 | 3-month mortality | 0.72 | 0.7 |
| Said et al[22] | Chronic liver diseases | 1611 | 3-year mortality | 0.83 | 0.79 |
Table 2 Comparative accuracy of prognostic scores in predicting decompensation
| Prognostic score | Time-dependent area under the curve |
| ALBI | 0.86 (0.78-0.92) |
| ALBI-fibrosis-4 | 0.77 (0.68-0.86) |
| Model for end-stage liver disease | 0.66 (0.56-0.75) |
| Child-Pugh | 0.65 (0.55-0.75) |
Table 3 Summary of prognostic factors in liver disease: Advantages and limitations
| Parameter | Description | Advantages | Disadvantages |
| Child-Pugh score | Liver function assessment based on 5 variables: Bilirubin, albumin, INR, ascites and encephalopathy | Extensive clinical experience, easy to calculate, divides patients into 3 severity classes | Subjective variables |
| MELD | Considers bilirubin, creatinin and INR | Objective, widely used, predicts mortality and need for transplantation | Does not account for other relevant prognostic indicators |
| Hepatic venous pressure gradient | Invasive measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient | Predictive of survival, reflects cirrhosis severity and complication risk, adds value to MELD | Invasive method, influenced by medications and other pathological conditions, not always available |
| Early prediction of decompensation score | Score based on albumin, bilirubin, platelets | High sensitivity in predicting decompensation, simple and quick to calculate | Limited validation |
| ALBI | Based on albumin and bilirubin | It assess hepatic functional reserve, greater sensitivity in detecting mild liver function deterioration | Does not account for other relevant prognostic indicators |
| ALBI-FIB-4 | Combines ALBI and FIB-4 | Identify the risk of decompensation, improves prediction compared to MELD in high-risk groups, useful for risk stratification of decompensation | Limited validation |
| FIB-4 | Score including age, transaminases and platelets | Simple, valid for estimating hepatic FIB and predicting adverse events like hepatocellular carcinoma and transplant | Limited to FIB evaluation, not always useful for advanced cirrhosis or non-fibrotic liver diseases |
| Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease FIB score | Score considering body mass index, glucose levels, transaminases, platelets, age and albumin | Valid for estimating hepatic FIB, predictor of cardiovascular events, mortality and liver-related event risks | Primarily applicable to metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease patients |
| Sarcopenia (CT and US) | Measurement of muscle mass, with CT as the gold standard and US as an alternative | CT is accurate and provides a reliable muscle mass measurement. US is less expensive, less invasiv and more accessible | CT is costly and not always available. US depends on the operator’s skill and there are no cut-off for diagnosis of sarcopenia |
| Hand grip strength | Measurement of muscle strength via hand grip, an indicator of overall muscle strength | Simple, inexpensive, non-invasive, useful for diagnosing sarcopenia and monitoring muscle changes | Does not directly measure muscle mass, cut-off value varies across studies |
| Artificial intelligence | Use of deep convolutional neural networks applied to CT images to automatically analyze muscle mass | High precision and consistency, reduces workload and increases efficiency | Requires computational resources and specialized training, further clinical validations needed |
| MiRNA (miR-21, miR-1, miR-133) | Small non-coding molecules that regulate gene expression and influence muscle biology, with implications for sarcopenia | Regulate muscle metabolism and are involved in muscle atrophy and FIB. Possible diagnostic and prognostic applications | Role still unclear, further research is needed to clarify their clinical applications in cirrhosis and sarcopenia |
- Citation: Del Cioppo S, Faccioli J, Ridola L. Hepatic cirrhosis and decompensation: Key indicators for predicting mortality risk. World J Hepatol 2025; 17(3): 104580
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v17/i3/104580.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v17.i3.104580
