BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Editorial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Hepatol. Dec 27, 2025; 17(12): 113844
Published online Dec 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i12.113844
Table 1 Key noninvasive prognostic markers in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease
Marker
Core components
Main domain assessed
Data type
Major strengths
Major limitations
FIB-4Age, AST, ALT, platelet countStructural (fibrosis burden)BiochemicalSimple, widely validated; good negative predictive valueInfluenced by age and inflammation; limited sensitivity for advanced fibrosis
NFSAge, BMI, diabetes, AST/ALT ratio, platelet count, albuminStructural + metabolicClinical + biochemicalIncorporates metabolic risk; widely usedRequires multiple variables; moderate specificity
ELFHyaluronic acid, PIIINP, TIMP-1Structural (fibrogenesis activity)Serum biomarkersHigh diagnostic accuracy; validated vs histologyRequires specialized assays; costly
ALBI scoreAlbumin, bilirubinFunctional (hepatic reserve)BiochemicalObjective, continuous, easily automated; complements fibrosis indicesNot validated in acute liver injury; limited data in early MASLD