Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Hepatol. Nov 27, 2025; 17(11): 111354
Published online Nov 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i11.111354
Published online Nov 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i11.111354
Table 1 Artificial intelligence -based models for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease diagnosis and their performance
| Ref. | AI model | Data used | Key finding | AUC/performance |
| Yu et al[3], 2025 | RF | 50 clinical and biochemical features (e.g., BMI, liver enzymes, metabolic markers); validated against histology or elastography in subsets of cohorts | Developed an explainable 10-feature RF model for MASLD prediction | AUC: 0.928 (internal), 0.918 (external) |
| Wakabayashi et al[8], 2025 | SVM | Clinical and laboratory markers (excluding platelet counts); validated against histology or elastography in subsets of cohorts | Predicted fibrosis stages without platelet count or elastography | AUC: 0.886 (≥ F2), 0.916 (cirrhosis) |
| Byra et al[9], 2022 | CNN (ultrasound) | Applied CNNs to ultrasound images for steatosis detection | Deep learning-based fat quantification using transfer learning | AUC: 0.91 (PDFF ≥ 5%) |
| Yasaka et al[10], 2018 | DL (CT) | Utilized CT-based DL for fibrosis staging; referenced biopsy-confirmed fibrosis stages for model validation | Staged liver fibrosis from CT scans (moderate correlation with histopathology) | Moderate performance (needs improvement) |
- Citation: Hegazy MAE. Artificial intelligence in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: Machine learning for non-invasive diagnosis and risk stratification. World J Hepatol 2025; 17(11): 111354
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v17/i11/111354.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v17.i11.111354
