BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Hepatol. Nov 27, 2025; 17(11): 111354
Published online Nov 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i11.111354
Table 1 Artificial intelligence -based models for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease diagnosis and their performance
Ref.
AI model
Data used
Key finding
AUC/performance
Yu et al[3], 2025RF50 clinical and biochemical features (e.g., BMI, liver enzymes, metabolic markers); validated against histology or elastography in subsets of cohortsDeveloped an explainable 10-feature RF model for MASLD predictionAUC: 0.928 (internal), 0.918 (external)
Wakabayashi et al[8], 2025SVMClinical and laboratory markers (excluding platelet counts); validated against histology or elastography in subsets of cohortsPredicted fibrosis stages without platelet count or elastographyAUC: 0.886 (≥ F2), 0.916 (cirrhosis)
Byra et al[9], 2022CNN (ultrasound)Applied CNNs to ultrasound images for steatosis detectionDeep learning-based fat quantification using transfer learningAUC: 0.91 (PDFF ≥ 5%)
Yasaka et al[10], 2018DL (CT)Utilized CT-based DL for fibrosis staging; referenced biopsy-confirmed fibrosis stages for model validationStaged liver fibrosis from CT scans (moderate correlation with histopathology)Moderate performance (needs improvement)