Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Hepatol. Oct 27, 2025; 17(10): 110107
Published online Oct 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i10.110107
Published online Oct 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i10.110107
Table 1 Barriers to achieving functional cure in chronic hepatitis B
| Category | Barrier | Description /mechanism |
| Viral factors | cccDNA persistence | cccDNA forms a stable nuclear minichromosome, serving as a reservoir for HBV transcription |
| High antigen load | Continuous production of HBsAg and HBcAg from cccDNA promotes immune tolerance and T cell exhaustion | |
| HBV-mediated immune suppression | HBsAg and HBeAg interfere with PRR signaling, hindering innate immune responses via IRF3 and NF-κB inhibition | |
| HBx-induced cell cycle modulation | HBx protein disrupts hepatocyte proliferation and prevents cccDNA dilution during cell division | |
| Host factors | Epigenetic control of cccDNA | Host enzymes (e.g., HDAC1, Smc5/6) modify cccDNA chromatin, affecting its transcriptional activity |
| Effective innate immunity | Kupffer cells, dendritic cells, and monocytes show impaired PRR signaling and reduced IFN production | |
| NK cell dysfunction | NK cells display reduced cytotoxicity, lower IFN-γ secretion, and contribute to CD8+ T cell depletion | |
| T cell exhaustion | HBV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells overexpress inhibitory receptors (PD-1, CTLA-4), resulting in functional impairment | |
| B cell dysfunction | Atypical memory B cells (e.g., PD-1+, FcRL5+) fail to generate effective anti-HBs antibodies | |
| Expansion of immunosuppressive cells | Regulatory T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells suppress antiviral immune responses | |
| Therapeutic gaps | No cccDNA-targeting therapies | Current antivirals suppress replication but do not eliminate or silence cccDNA effectively |
| Limited immunotherapeutic tools | PEG-IFN and NAs yield low HBsAg clearance; novel immunotherapies are investigational |
Table 2 Summary of published studies on hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance (functional cure) in chronic hepatitis B
| Ref. | Year | Study type | n | Cohort and treatment | HBsAg seroclearance rate |
| Lau et al[36] | 2005 | RCT | 814 | HBeAg+ CHB on PEG-IFN α | 2.95% at 6 months post-treatment |
| Marcellin et al[39] | 2013 | RCT | 537 | HBeAg- CHB on PEG-IFN α | 3% (6 months), 9% (3 years), 12% (5 years) |
| Bourlière et al[53] | 2017 | RCT | 185 | HBeAg- CHB: NA vs NA + PEG-IFN | 3.2% vs 7.8% at 96 weeks |
| Ahn et al[55] | 2018 | RCT | 740 | TDF + PEG-IFN vs TDF mono | 9.1% vs 0% at 72 weeks |
| Zhou et al[32] | 2019 | Meta-analysis | 48972 | Untreated CHB | 1.17% per year |
| Yeo et al[33] | 2019 | Meta-analysis | 42588 | Untreated CHB | 1.02% per year |
| Yip et al[45] | 2019 | Retrospective | 20263 | CHB on TDF/ETV | 2.1% (mean FU: 4.8 years) |
| Yeo et al[34] | 2020 | Prospective cohort | 11262 | Untreated CHB | 1.31% per year |
| Yang et al[52] | 2020 | RCT | 144 | CHB on ETV vs ETV + PEG-IFN | 1.8% vs 4.1% |
| Fonseca et al[56] | 2020 | Meta-analysis | 8719 | CHB on IFN+NA vs IFN vs NA (48-130 weeks) | 4.8% to 6.5% vs 3.6% to 6.5% vs 0.27% to 0.58% |
| Song et al[43] | 2021 | Meta-analysis | 1029 | IHCs on PEG-IFN | 47% at 48 weeks |
| Hsu et al[47] | 2021 | Retrospective | 4769 | CHB on TDF/ETV | 0.22% per year |
| Chan et al[48] | 2024 | RCT | 1298 | CHB on TAF | ≤ 1.2% at 5 years |
Table 3 Predictors of hepatitis B surface antigen clearance in chronic hepatitis B
| Category | Subcategory | Predictor variables |
| Spontaneous clearance | Host factors | Male sex; older age (hazard ratio 1.16-1.21) |
| Viral factors | HBeAg-negative status; genotype C infection; lower HBV DNA (≤ 20000 IU/mL); low quantitative HBsAg (≤ 1000 IU/mL) | |
| PEG-IFN therapy | Host factors | Younger age; female sex; ALT elevation at week 12 |
| Treatment factors | Combination therapy (PEG-IFN + NAs) more effective than PEG-IFN alone | |
| Viral factors | Genotype A; low baseline HBsAg and HBV DNA; early HBsAg decline (at week 12 or 24) | |
| NAs therapy | Treatment factors | Early HBeAg seroconversion (before age 18); initiating high-barrier NA before seroconversion |
| Viral factors | Low HBsAg (< 1000 IU/mL) at 18 months post-seroconversion | |
| NA discontinuation in HBeAg-negative CHB | Treatment factors | End-of-treatment HBsAg < 100 IU/mL; ALT/qHBsAg ratio ≥ 0.2 |
| Viral factor | Low HBsAg glycan isomer (≤ 3.5 Log ng/mL) associated with 5-fold higher 10-year clearance | |
| Prediction models | Nomogram | BMI, HBeAg status, qHBsAg, HBV DNA (C-index 0.91) |
| HepBLOSS-1 & HepBLOSS-2 | Age, sex, HBsAg, HBV DNA; AUROC 0.81-0.89; > 50% 10-year clearance in high-risk groups | |
| HBRN-SQuARe | Sex, age, race, qHBsAg; AUROC 0.99 (1 year), 0.95 (3 years) in untreated HBeAg-negative CHB |
- Citation: Marrapu S, Soni JR, Kamal K, Kumar R. Hepatitis B functional cure: Current and future perspective. World J Hepatol 2025; 17(10): 110107
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v17/i10/110107.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v17.i10.110107
