Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Hepatol. Aug 27, 2022; 14(8): 1608-1620
Published online Aug 27, 2022. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i8.1608
Published online Aug 27, 2022. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i8.1608
Table 1 patient characteristics
Characteristic | Case subjects (n = 29) |
Sex | |
Male (n) | 21 |
Female (n) | 8 |
Age at diagnosis, yr (mean ± SEM) | 69.1 ± 2.1 |
BMI, kg/m² (mean ± SEM) | 26.6 ± 1.0 |
BCLC stage (n) | |
BCLB-B | 1 |
BCLB-C | 28 |
HCC characteristics (n) | |
Bilobar | 18/28 |
Multifocal | 15/26 |
Vascular invasion | 8/29 |
UP-TO-7-Criteria | 16/29 |
Metastasis (n) | |
No metastases | 16 |
1 meta location | 8 |
2 meta locations | 3 |
4 meta locations | 2 |
AFP at baseline, ng/mL (mean ± SEM) | 4375.6 ± 2566.6 |
Cirrhosis (n) | |
No Cirrhosis | 10 |
CP A | 10 |
CP B | 8 |
Unknown | 1 |
Origin cirrhosis (n) | |
HBV | 4 |
HCV | 2 |
Ethyl | 7 |
NAFLD | 3 |
Other | 2 |
Missing | 1 |
WHO performance status (n) | |
0 | 5 |
1 | 21 |
2 | 3 |
Previous treatment (n) (Resection, radiofrequency ablation, transarterial radioembolization, transarterial chemoembolization, selective internal radiation therapy, sorafenib, capecitabine, GEMOX, doxorubicine, FOLFOX, regorafenib, cabozantinib) | |
Yes | 27 |
No | 2 |
Table 2 Survival per radiologic response category
Radiological response | Total n | Overall survival, mo (mean ± SEM) | n of deaths (%) | n alive at study closure (%) |
Progressive disease | 16 | 8.8 ± 2.0 | 15 (93.7) | 1 (6.3) |
Stable disease | 6 | 10.4 ± 2.1 | 5 (83.3) | 1 (16.7) |
Partial response | 3 | Not assessable | 2 (66.7) | 1 (33.3) |
Complete response | 4 | Not assessable | 0 (0) | 4 (100) |
Overall | 29 | 14.5 ± 2.1 | 22 (75.9) | 7 (24.1) |
Table 3 Survival per biological response category
Biological (AFP) response | Total n | Overall survival, mo (mean ± SEM) | n of deaths (%) | n alive at study closure (%) |
Increase ≥ 25% | 16 | 9.6 ± 1.8 | 15 (93.7) | 1 (6.3) |
Stable | 2 | 2 | 2 (100) | 0 (0) |
Decrease ≥ 25% without normalization | 1 | 26 | 1 (100) | 0 (0) |
Normalization of AFP (< 7 μg/L) | 5 | Not assessable | 0 (0) | 5 (100) |
AFP remains negative | 5 | 13.8 ± 3.9 | 4 (80) | 1 (20) |
Overall | 29 | 14.5 ± 2.1 | 22 (75.9) | 7 (24.1) |
Table 4 Evolution of World Health Organization performance status
WHO PS | 2 mo | 4 mo |
Worse PS | 8 (29.6%) | 5 (21.7%) |
Stable PS | 14 (51.9%) | 13 (56.5%) |
Better PS | 5 (18.5%) | 5 (21.7%) |
Total | 27 (100%) | 23 (100%) |
Death | 2 | 6 |
Table 5 Evolution of Child-Pugh score
CP score | 2 mo | 4 mo |
Worse CP | 9 (36%) | 7 (33.3%) |
Stable CP | 15 (60%) | 12 (57.1%) |
Better CP | 1 (4%) | 2 (9.5%) |
Total | 25 (100%) | 21 (100%) |
Death | 2 | 6 |
Missing | 2 | 2 |
Table 6 Viral vs non-viral liver disease and response to nivolumab
Radiological response | Non-viral liver disease | Viral disease | Total |
Progressive disease | 10 | 5 | 15 |
Stable disease | 5 | 1 | 6 |
Partial response | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Complete response | 4 | 0 | 4 |
Total | 22 | 6 | 28 |
- Citation: De Wilde N, Vonghia L, Francque S, De Somer T, Bagdadi A, Staub E, Lambrechts J, Bucalau AM, Verset G, Van Steenkiste C. Real-life multi-center retrospective analysis on nivolumab in difficult-to-treat patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Hepatol 2022; 14(8): 1608-1620
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v14/i8/1608.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v14.i8.1608