Thuluvath PJ, Li F. Modified EASL-CLIF criteria that is easier to use and perform better to prognosticate acute-on-chronic liver failure. World J Hepatol 2022; 14(2): 420-428 [PMID: 35317179 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i2.420]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Paul J Thuluvath, FAASLD, AGAF, FACG, FRCP, Professor, Institute of Digestive Health and Liver Diseases, Mercy Medical Center, 301 Saint Paul Place, Baltimore, MD 21202, United States. thuluvath@gmail.com
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Observational Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Hepatol. Feb 27, 2022; 14(2): 420-428 Published online Feb 27, 2022. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i2.420
Table 1 The definitions of modified the European Association for the Study of the Liver-Chronic Liver Failure Consortium organ failures and grades
Definition of mEACLF organ failures
Liver
Bilirubin ≥ 12 mg/dL
Coagulation
INR ≥ 2.0
Brain
Hepatic encephalopathy grade 3-4
Kidney
Serum creatinine ≥ 2.35 mg/dL or renal replacement
Heart
On vasopressors
Respiration
On mechanical ventilation
Definition of mEACLF grades
Grade 1
Any one organ failure
Grade 2
Any 2 organ failures
Grade 3
Any 3 or more organ failures
Table 2 Characteristics of patients with the European Association for the Study of the Liver-Chronic Liver Failure Consortium and modified the European Association for the Study of the Liver-Chronic Liver Failure Consortium organ failures
Variable
Response
All (n = 29618)
EASL-CLIF (n = 14044)
mEACLF (n = 15574)
P value
Age
mean ± SD
52.9 ± 11.6
52.9 ± 11.7
52.9 ± 11.8
0.46
Gender, n (%)
Female
11803 (40)
5601 (40)
6202 (40)
0.92
Race, n (%)
White
20059 (68)
9484 (68)
10575 (68)
0.95
Black
2530 (9)
1215 (9)
1315 (8)
Hispanic
5242 (18)
2496 (18)
2746 (18)
Asian
1129 (4)
540 (4)
589 (4)
Others
658 (2)
309 (2)
349 (2)
Etiology, n (%)
HCV
3661 (12)
1730 (12)
1931 (12)
0.87
Alcohol
12537 (42)
5909 (42)
6628 (43)
HCV + Alcohol
353 (1)
165 (1)
188 (1)
Cryptogenic
1507 (5)
712 (5)
795 (5)
Others
11560 (39)
5528 (39)
6032 (39)
Bilirubin
mean ± SD
13.8 ± 12.5
14.1 ± 12.7
13.4 ± 12.3
0.001
Creatinine
mean ± SD
2.11 ± 1.79
2.19 ± 1.81
2.03 ± 1.77
< 0.001
INR
mean ± SD
2.30 ± 1.12
2.29 ± 1.15
2.30 ± 1.08
< 0.001
Encephalopathy, n (%)
Grade 3-4
7088 (24)
3544 (25)
3544 (23)
< 0.001
Respiration, n (%)
Yes
1598 (5)
799 (6)
799 (5)
0.03
Circulatory, n (%)
Yes
2684 (9)
1342 (10)
1342 (9)
0.005
MELD-Na
mean ± SD
29.9 ± 8.1
30.2 ± 8.2
29.7 ± 8.0
< 0.001
Albumin
mean ± SD
3.10 ± 0.74
3.12 ± 0.74
3.08 ± 0.74
< 0.001
Ascites, n (%)
Moderate
13357 (45)
6456 (46)
6901 (44)
0.02
Table 3 The distribution of patients by the number of organ failure by the European Association for the Study of the Liver-Chronic Liver Failure Consortium and modified the European Association for the Study of the Liver-Chronic Liver Failure Consortium criteria
Number of OF by EASL-CLIF
Number of OF by mEACLF criteria
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Total
0
24227
2086
0
0
0
0
0
26313
1
556
5748
1395
0
0
0
0
7699
2
0
229
2875
653
0
0
0
3757
3
0
0
152
1193
215
0
0
1560
4
0
0
0
52
458
96
0
606
5
0
0
0
0
10
238
63
311
6
0
0
0
0
0
8
103
111
Total
24783
8063
4422
1898
683
342
166
40357
Table 4 The distribution of patients by the European Association for the Study of the Liver-Chronic Liver Failure Consortium and modified European Association for the Study of the Liver-Chronic Liver Failure Consortium grades of the acute-on-chronic liver failure and their 30-d all-cause mortality
EASL-CLIF grade
Number of patients mEACLF Grade (all-cause mortality%)
0
1
2
3
Total
0
24227 (1.2)
5114 (3.3)
1372 (10.2)
0
30713 (2.0)
1
556 (4.1)
2720 (6.5)
23 (10.2)
0
3299 (6.1)
2
0
229 (13.1)
2875 (11.8)
653 (15.0)
3757 (12.5)
3
0
0
152 (21.7)
2436 (24.5)
2588 (24.4)
Total
24783 (1.3)
8063 (4.7)
4422 (11.7)
3089 (22.5)
40357 (4.7)
Citation: Thuluvath PJ, Li F. Modified EASL-CLIF criteria that is easier to use and perform better to prognosticate acute-on-chronic liver failure. World J Hepatol 2022; 14(2): 420-428