Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Hepatol. Sep 27, 2025; 17(9): 111126
Published online Sep 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i9.111126
Published online Sep 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i9.111126
Figure 1 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram of study selection process.
Figure 2 Recurrence rate of hepatocellular carcinoma.
GLMM: Generalized Linear Mixed Model; N/A: Not applicable; PCRS: Predicting cancer recurrence score; RETREAT: Risk estimation of tumor recurrence after transplant.
Figure 3 Sensitivity and specificity.
A: Sensitivity risk estimation of tumor recurrence after transplant (RETREAT); B: Specificity RETREAT. FN: False negatives; FP: False positive; RETREAT: Risk estimation of tumor recurrence after transplant; TP: True positives.
Figure 4 Sensitivity and specificity of predicting cancer recurrence score and Decaens.
A: Sensitivity; B: Specificity. FN: False negatives; FP: False positive; PCRS: Predicting cancer recurrence score; TP: True positives.
- Citation: Christofoli de Barros I, Vanzin Fernandes M, Rodríguez Villafuerte S, Brandão ABM. Explant-based prognostic models for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Hepatol 2025; 17(9): 111126
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v17/i9/111126.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v17.i9.111126