Review
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Hepatol. Sep 27, 2014; 6(9): 626-631
Published online Sep 27, 2014. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v6.i9.626
Living-donor vs deceased-donor liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
Nobuhisa Akamatsu, Yasuhiko Sugawara, Norihiro Kokudo
Nobuhisa Akamatsu, Yasuhiko Sugawara, Norihiro Kokudo, Artificial Organ and Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to this work.
Correspondence to: Yasuhiko Sugawara, MD, Artificial Organ and Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan. yasusuga-tky@umin.ac.jp
Telephone: +81-3-38155411 Fax: +81-3-56843989
Received: April 24, 2014
Revised: July 29, 2014
Accepted: August 27, 2014
Published online: September 27, 2014
Processing time: 178 Days and 7.7 Hours
Core Tip

Core tip: The current opinions and clinical reports regarding differences in the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) between living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) were reviewed. In the absence of a prospective study regarding the use of LDLT vs DDLT for HCC patients, only with some retrospective studies with conflicting results, there is no evidence to support the higher HCC recurrence after LDLT than DDLT, and LDLT remains a reasonable treatment option for HCC patients with cirrhosis.