Published online Apr 27, 2024. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v16.i4.650
Peer-review started: December 16, 2023
First decision: January 17, 2024
Revised: January 30, 2024
Accepted: March 19, 2024
Article in press: March 19, 2024
Published online: April 27, 2024
Processing time: 130 Days and 5.5 Hours
Many liver transplant (LT) recipients are able to be maintained on long-term immunosuppressive monotherapy, most commonly with either tacrolimus or mycophenolate. In experimental studies, tacrolimus is associated with increased carcinogenicity, whereas mycophenolic acid (MPA) may have anti-neoplastic properties. However, there is minimal clinical data comparing the relative carcinogenicity of tacrolimus and MPA in LT or other solid organ transplant recipients.
Post-transplant malignancy (PTM) is a leading cause of late mortality in LT recipients. Thus, a clinically relevant difference in the carcinogenic risk profile between tacrolimus and MPA will affect the choice of immunosuppressive agent used as maintenance monotherapy in LT patients.
To determine the relative carcinogenicity of tacrolimus and MPA in solid organ transplantation.
A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines with relevant articles published between 1st January 2002 to 11th August 2022 retrieved from MEDLINE and Embase databases for review.
A total of 6 studies were included in this systematic review, which did not demonstrate a clear difference between tacrolimus and MPA in the development of de novo PTM following solid organ transplantation.
The relative carcinogenicity of tacrolimus and MPA, and its clinical relevance in solid organ transplantation, remains unclear.
This review highlights the need for further large, population-based prospective studies to further assess the carcinogenic profiles of tacrolimus and MPA, to assist physicians in the choice of immunosuppressive agent to use as maintenance monotherapy in LT patients.
