Published online Oct 27, 2021. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v13.i10.1439
Peer-review started: April 25, 2021
First decision: June 15, 2021
Revised: June 19, 2021
Accepted: September 2, 2021
Article in press: September 2, 2021
Published online: October 27, 2021
Processing time: 180 Days and 1.4 Hours
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignancies world-wide, and is a growing cause for cancer-related mortality globally. Curative therapies include ablation for small tumors, surgical resection, and liver transplantation.
At present, there is clear evidence underpinning the guidelines for management of small tumors (≤ 3 cm in maximal diameter) and three small tumors (i.e., all ≤ 3 cm), however a scarcity of literature surrounding the optimal management of two small tumors. In addition, it is unclear if synchronous (i.e., occurring at the same time) and sequential (i.e., occurring at different points in time) tumors have differing prognoses.
This study aimed to assess the outcome of two small tumors (i.e., ≤ 3 cm in maximal diameter), and whether there was a difference in prognosis between those occurring synchronously and sequentially. This is to help guide future guidelines for manage
This was a retrospective multicenter study conducted in Victoria, Australia, including all patients diagnosed with two small HCCs between 1st January 2000 and 31st March 2018. Review of the medical record for patient demographics, liver disease, tumor-specific details, treatment and outcome was collected. Diagnosis of HCC was based on accepted radiographic and/or histologic criteria. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and transplant-free survival (TFS).
One-hundred and four patients, majority male (n = 89, 86%), with a median age of 63 years-old (interquartile range 58-67.75), and predominantly suffering from viral chronic liver disease (n = 57, 55%) were included in the final analysis and followed up for a median of 2.54 years. There was a slight majority in those presenting synchronously (n = 59, 57%) compared with those diagnosed sequentially (n = 45, 43%), with the only difference between these two groups being more severe liver disease on the basis of model for end stage liver disease (MELD) (11 vs 8, P = 0.01). 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS was similar between the two groups (P = 0.41), however TFS was higher in the sequential group (1-, 3- and 5-year TFS 93.2%, 56.6% and 48.5%, compared with 68.5%, 37.3% and 29.7% in the synchronous group, P = 0.02). This difference did not persist in multivariate analysis (P = 0.24), with only MELD > 14 being predictive of mortality in the model (hazard ratio 2.51, 95%CI: 1.15-5.46, P = 0.02).
Transplant-free survival in patients with two HCCs ≤ 3 cm is poor irrespective if diagnosed synchronously or sequentially, and so all patients with two small tumors should be assessed and considered for liver transplantation.
Given limited availability of liver transplantation, future research should aim to define the molecular carcinogenetic signature in multifocal tumors, which can occur from multi-centric hepatocarcinogenesis or intrahepatic metastases, and whether this impacts recurrence, prognosis, and response to curative therapy.