Copyright
        ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
    
    
        World J Stem Cells. Jul 26, 2014; 6(3): 367-370
Published online Jul 26, 2014. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v6.i3.367
Published online Jul 26, 2014. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v6.i3.367
            Table 1 Immunophenotype and differentiation potential comparison between umbilical cord matrix derived fibroblasts and bone-marrow-mesenchymal stem cells
        
    | Immunophenotype | Gene expression | Differentiation potential | ||
| BM-MSC | Positive for: | CD90, CD73, CD105, CD13, CD44[1] | CTSB, CTSD, PHB[10], BSP[7], Leptin[12] | No report for osteo-, adipo or chondrogenic differentiation failure | 
| SSEA-4, LNGFR[6], CD146+++[7] | HOX-gene[7], DLK-1[16], pSmad2 (low and modulated)[12] | |||
| Negative for: | CD14, CD34[1], CD56[7] | |||
| UC-MSC | Positive for: | CD90, CD73, CD105, CD13, CD44[1] | PAI-1, MnSOD[10], HOX-gene (different expression pattern)[7] | Reports for adipo-[13,15] and osteogenic[7,12] differentiation failure | 
| CD56, CD146++[7] | pSmad2 (high and constitutive)[12] | |||
| Negative for: | CD14, CD34[1], SSEA-4, LNGFR[6] | CTSB, CTSD, PHB[10], BSP[7], Leptin[12], DLK-1 (or weakly)[16] | 
- Citation: Zeddou M, Relic B, Malaise MG. Umbilical cord fibroblasts: Could they be considered as mesenchymal stem cells? World J Stem Cells 2014; 6(3): 367-370
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-0210/full/v6/i3/367.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v6.i3.367

 
         
                         
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                         
                         
                        