BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Editorial
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Stem Cells. Aug 26, 2026; 18(8): 116228
Published online Aug 26, 2026. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.116228
Table 1 Multidimensional regulatory landscape of X-inactive specific transcript in spinal cord injury: From mitochondrial metabolism to epigenetic and immune control
Regulatory dimension
Key molecular partners/targets
Core mechanistic action
Functional impact and SCI outcome
Ref.
Epigenetic and chromatinSAF-A/HNRNPU, PRC1/2, MED14XIST coating and chromatin anchoring; recruitment of polycomb complexes; suppression of specific enhancersMaintains XCI integrity and lineage stability in stem cellsKolpa et al[14], 2016; Bousard et al[15], 2019; Richart et al[16], 2022
Post-transcriptional and metabolic (core axis)IGF2BP2, CPT1A, NDUFA2XIST recruits IGF2BP2 (m6A reader) to stabilize CPT1A and NDUFA2 mRNAs; markedly enhances FAO and OXPHOSPromotes neuronal differentiation of NSCs; increases ATP production and OCR; improves locomotor recovery and reduces neuroinflammationZeng et al[1], 2025; Huang et al[4], 2022; Wang et al[11], 2021; Weng et al[17], 2022
Immune-metabolic and ceRNAmiR-124-3p, IRF1XIST acts as a ceRNA sponge for miR-124-3p, modulating the Irf1 pathway and microglial polarizationRegulates M1/M2 macrophage balance; exerts context-dependent effects on the inflammatory microenvironmentYang et al[18], 2023
Systemic and intercellularmiR-539-3p, ADAMTS5; MSC-derived exosomesXIST modulates hepatic mitochondrial injury via Adamts5 axis; XIST-containing EVs facilitate stem-immune crosstalkSustains cross-organ energy homeostasis; drives pro-regenerative M2 phenotype through exosomal shuttling of regulatory RNAsWu et al[2], 2023; Karpenko[19], 2025; Phinney et al[20], 2015; Arabpour et al[21], 2021
Table 2 Prioritized research agenda and experimental strategies for X-chromosome inactivation-centered metabolic interventions in spinal cord injury
Research priority
Current gap (critique of evidence)
Suggested experimental approach (specific parameters)
Expected outcome
Ref.
Precision histomorphology and lineage specificityInsufficiency of specialized histological characterization; lack of specific parameters to confirm NSC terminal differentiationConfocal co-localization analysis (e.g., BrdU/NeuN for neurogenesis; synaptophysin for synaptic integration); integration of snRNA-seq and spatial transcriptomicsHigh-resolution mapping of XIST-mediated lineage commitment and functional integration across neural/glial subpopulationsLi et al[7], 2024; Zhang et al[32], 2024
Long-term structural and functional stabilityAbsence of 12-24 week chronic-phase data; limited correlation between short-term metabolic gains and longitudinal functional trajectoriesStandardized chronic injury paradigms (compression/contusion); 12-24 weeks follow-up; multiparametric MRI/DTI coupled with composite behavioral metrics (gait analysis, grid walking)Verification of sustained regenerative benefits, scar-stabilizing effects, and long-term structure-function correlations in chronic SCIRosenzweig et al[35], 2018; Chen et al[33], 2023
Metabolic safety and targeted delivery systemsSystemic metabolic risks of non-specific CPT1A intervention; demand for scalable, CNS-oriented and bio-responsive delivery platformsCell-type-specific Cpt1a cKO or knock-in models; engineered exosomes (EVs) or LNPs integrated into hydrogel scaffoldsEstablishment of an optimized therapeutic window and clinically feasible “gene-cell-vector” platforms for spinal cord repairMorant-Ferrando et al[12], 2023; Williams et al[34], 2025


Write to the Help Desk