Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Stem Cells. Apr 26, 2025; 17(4): 102945
Published online Apr 26, 2025. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v17.i4.102945
Published online Apr 26, 2025. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v17.i4.102945
Table 1 Comparison of stem cell types
Stem cell source | Harvesting method | Differentiation potential | Anti-inflammatory action | Applicable scenarios | Prospects for IVDD repair application |
BMSCs | Bone marrow extraction, complex procedure | Multipotent differentiation potential, can differentiate into NPCs and AF cells | Secretes TGF-β, IGF-1, VEGF; regulates ECM metabolism, reduces NP cell apoptosis and inflammation | Suitable for severe disc damage | Demonstrates repair potential in in vivo and in vitro studies and early clinical research; long-term efficacy still requires validation |
ADSCs | Fat extraction, relatively simple | Multipotent differentiation ability, promotes ECM production | Secretes anti-inflammatory factors, helps reduce NP cell apoptosis and inflammation | Minimally invasive treatment, suitable for wide application | Shows promising results in preclinical studies; combining with materials like hydrogels can enhance therapeutic effects |
UC-MSCs | Extraction from umbilical cord tissue, easy to obtain | Multipotent differentiation potential, high proliferative capacity | Secretes TGF-β, VEGF, IL-10; exhibits significant anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic effects | Suitable for allogeneic transplantation and large-scale treatment, low immunogenicity | Shows good results in preclinical studies; can be further optimized with gene editing and exosome technologies |
ProNPs | Extraction from the disc, relatively complex | Differentiates into mature NP cells | Promotes NP tissue regeneration through paracrine effects | Suitable for NP regeneration, high potential | Promotes ECM production by activating specific signaling pathways, high future application potential |
Table 2 Clinical and in vivo/in vitro experimental data
Experiment type | Cell source | Main observed data | Comparative effects | Ref. |
In vitro experiment | BMSCs, NPC | NP cell survival rate, ECM production | BMSCs and NPCs in coculture significantly increased NP cell survival and promoted the generation of type II collagen and proteoglycans. In a hypoxic environment, TGF-β and Notch pathways enhanced disc microenvironment repair | [16,67] |
In vivo experiment | BMSCs, UC-MSCs | Disc height, NP cell count, NP cell apoptosis rate | Intradiscal injection of BMSCs and UC-MSCs significantly reduced NP cell apoptosis and restored disc height. Exosomes combined with hydrogels improved stem cell engraftment in the disc | [32,55] |
Clinical trial | BMSCs | Pain relief, functional recovery, disc water content | Early clinical trials of BMSC injections showed significant pain reduction in patients, with increased NP water content at 12-month follow-up, confirming BMSC repair potential. Several studies showed significant pain relief postinjection with no severe side effects | [20] |
In vitro test | ADSCs | Pain score, functional improvement, disc regeneration | ADSC injections demonstrated significant pain relief and functional improvement in patients with lower back pain, with substantial reductions in pain scores and no reported severe complications | [25] |
Animal experiment | BMSC exosomes | ECM production, disc height, inflammation | BMSC exosomes significantly enhanced NP cell antiapoptotic capacity, promoted ECM synthesis, and restored disc structure and elasticity. Exosomes reduced inflammation in disc degeneration models by activating the PI3K/AKT pathway | [11] |
In vitro test | BMSC and ADSC exosomes | Disc repair rate, inflammation modulation, cell survival | Stem cell-derived exosomes promoted disc repair by reducing inflammation and enhancing NP cell survival, showing significant therapeutic potential when combined with gene editing technology and biomaterials | [90,91] |
Table 3 Comparison of signaling pathways and effects
Signaling pathway | Key factors | Regulatory mechanism | Functional effects |
TGF-β signaling pathway | TGF-β, Smad2/3 | Promotes ECM production and reduces cell apoptosis by activating the Smad pathway | Enhances the survival of NPCs, promotes type II collagen and proteoglycan production, maintains disc elasticity |
Wnt/β-catenin pathway | β-catenin | Activates the translocation of β-catenin into the nucleus, regulating the expression of cartilage-related genes | Promotes differentiation of NPCs and chondrocyte-like cells, enhances ECM production, maintains disc structural integrity |
PI3K/AKT pathway | PI3K, AKT, mTOR, Bcl-2 | Enhances stem cell survival and reduces apoptosis of nucleus pulposus cells by activating mTOR and Bcl-2 | Increases stem cell survival rate under hypoxic conditions, enhances regenerative ability, reduces inflammatory response |
NF-κB signaling pathway | NF-κB, TNF-α, IL-6 | Inhibits the expression of inflammation-related molecules like TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β associated with NF-κB, delays tissue damage, and reduces apoptosis of NPCs | Improves the survival rate of NPCs through anti-inflammatory and antiapoptotic effects, promoting tissue regeneration |
Notch signaling pathway | Notch1, Notch2, CSL, NICD | Activates the CSL transcription factor through ligand binding, promoting stem cell proliferation and differentiation | Enhances the formation of NPCs and annulus fibrosus cells, increases the regenerative potential of disc tissue |
HIF-1α signaling pathway | HIF-1α, IGF-1 | Regulates the metabolism of NPCs and ECM synthesis, enhancing cell survival in a hypoxic microenvironment | Maintains disc tissue elasticity, reduces cell apoptosis, delays disc degeneration |
Table 4 Comparison of stem cell therapy and traditional treatments
Treatment method | Advantages | Indications | Limitations | Clinical application cases |
Conservative treatment | High safety, suitable for early-stage patients, usually includes medication and physical therapy, low risk | Suitable for patients with early mild symptoms | Cannot reverse disc degeneration, limited effectiveness, can only temporarily relieve symptoms | Commonly used for early IVDD patients but cannot fundamentally stop disease progression |
Minimally invasive surgery | Minimal surgical trauma, shorter recovery time, low risk | Applicable to patients with moderate IVDD | The effect may not be as good as traditional surgery, and symptoms may recur in some patients | Shows good short-term effects in some patients, suitable for those unwilling to undergo invasive surgery |
Open surgery | Relieves nerve compression symptoms caused by disc herniation; spinal fusion can restore spinal stability | Suitable for severe degenerative disc disease and neurological symptoms | High trauma, long recovery time, high surgical risks, possible postoperative complications, and inability to restore normal disc function | Surgical treatment can effectively relieve pain and neurological symptoms, but recovery is slow, and there is a risk of recurrence |
Stem cell therapy | Minimally invasive, with regenerative potential, capable of repairing disc tissue through differentiation and paracrine mechanisms; has immunomodulatory effects, reduces inflammation, and inhibits apoptosis | Applicable to early IVDD patients who do not respond to traditional treatments | The long-term survival rate and safety of stem cells in the disc require further research, with potential risks of immune rejection and tumor formation | Clinical trials indicate that BMSC injections can significantly reduce patient pain, with follow-up showing increased hydration of the nucleus pulposus |
Stem cell + exosome therapy | Stem cell exosomes help enhance stem cell survival rate, and exosomes act as carriers of signaling molecules, promoting tissue repair | Suitable for patients who are not candidates for surgery | Long-term efficacy needs further validation, and the isolation and preparation techniques for exosomes still need improvement | Combining gene editing technology and biomaterials has enhanced its regenerative effects, with preclinical studies demonstrating significant regenerative potential |
Table 5 Applications of combining gene editing with biomaterials in stem cell therapy
Technology/material type | Target gene/material | Main mechanism of action | Application scenario | Experimental results | Ref. |
CRISPR-Cas9 | Parkin | CRISPR-dCas9-KRAB system used to silence the expression of Parkin | Targeting Parkin provides a new approach for IVDD repair | Inhibition of Parkin significantly reduces mitophagy and accelerates apoptosis of NPCs | [128] |
siRNA | Bcl-2 | Reduces apoptosis by inhibiting the expression of apoptosis-related gene Bcl-2 | Inhibition of NPC apoptosis | Decreases the apoptosis rate of NPCs, promoting disc tissue repair | [113,114] |
Gene editing + hydrogel | HIF-1α | Enhances HIF-1α expression in hypoxic environments, improving stem cell survival | Disc regeneration and cell protection under hypoxic conditions | Significantly improves stem cell colonization and survival, promoting regeneration of nucleus pulposus tissue | [26,27] |
Gene editing + chitosan | IGF-1 | Enhances IGF-1 expression, promoting cell proliferation and differentiation | NP tissue repair and regeneration | Increases the proliferation rate of NPCs, enhances type II collagen and proteoglycan production | [123] |
Nanofiber scaffold | No gene editing | Provides 3D structural support, enhancing stem cell colonization efficiency | Tissue regeneration and structural repair | Nanofiber scaffold provides ideal mechanical support, significantly improving tissue structure restoration | [112] |
CRISPR + exosome | miRNA | Increases miRNA content in exosomes, regulates inflammation, and promotes tissue repair | Inflammation control and disc regeneration | Significantly reduces inflammation, promotes ECM production, and enhances cell repair capacity | [30] |
Gene editing + nanoparticles | VEGF | Overexpression of the VEGF gene increases angiogenesis, improving blood supply to the disc | Disc vascularization and regeneration | Promotes angiogenesis in disc tissue, enhancing regeneration capacity | [30,128] |
- Citation: Li ZP, Li H, Ruan YH, Wang P, Zhu MT, Fu WP, Wang RB, Tang XD, Zhang Q, Li SL, Yin H, Li CJ, Tian YG, Han RN, Wang YB, Zhang CJ. Stem cell therapy for intervertebral disc degeneration: Clinical progress with exosomes and gene vectors. World J Stem Cells 2025; 17(4): 102945
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-0210/full/v17/i4/102945.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v17.i4.102945