Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Stem Cells. Jun 26, 2021; 13(6): 503-520
Published online Jun 26, 2021. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v13.i6.503
Published online Jun 26, 2021. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v13.i6.503
Table 1 Monoclonal antibody studies
Drug [Ref.] | Target | No. of patients | Study design | Study phase | Results |
Obinutuzumab | CD20 | ||||
[42] | 781 | CLL (CIRS ≥ 6) O + Clb vs R + Clb | 3 | PFS: 28.9 mo vs 15.7 mo (HR 0.49, P < 0.0001; OS: NR vs 73.1 mo (HR 0.76, P = 0.0245) Grade ≥ 3 AEs: Infusion reactions 20% vs 4%, Neutropenia 33% vs 28% | |
[44] | 1202 | FL (untreated) O + Chemo vs R + Chemo | 3 | 3-yr PFS rate: 80.0% vs 73.3% HR 0.66 P = 0.001 ORR: 88.5% vs 86.9% 3-yr OS rate: 94.0% vs 92.1% (HR 0.75, P = 0.21) Grade ≥ 3 AEs: 74.6% vs 67.8% | |
[45] | 413 | FL (rituximab refractory) O + Benda vs Benda | 3 | PFS: NR vs 14.9 mo (HR 0.55, P = 0.0001) OS: ND Grade ≥ 3 AEs: Neutropenia 33% vs 26%; Infusion reactions 11% vs 6% | |
Tafasitamab[47] | CD19 | 92 | DLBCL R/RT + Lenalidomide | 2 | ORR: 43% CR: 18% PFS: 12.1 mo Grade ≥ 3 AEs: Neutropenia 48%, Thrombocytopenia 17%, Febrile neutropenia 12% |
Magrolimab[52] | CD47 | 22 | R/R DLBCL or FL M + R | 1b | DLBCL ORR/CR: 40%/33% FL ORR/CR: 71%/43% AEs: Anemia, Infusion reactions |
Mogamulizumab[53] | CCR4 | 372 | CTCL R/R Mo vs Vorinostat | 3 | PFS: 7.7 mo vs 3.1 mo (HR 0.53, P < 0.0001) Grade ≥ 3 AEs: Mo: pyrexia 4%, cellulitis 3%; V: cellulitis 3%, PE 3%, sepsis 3% |
Table 2 Antibody-drug conjugate studies
Drug [Ref.] | Target | No. of patients | Study design | Study phase | Results |
Brentuximab-vedotin | CD30 | ||||
[10,58] | 102 | R/R cHL | 2 | ORR/CR: 72%/33% PFS 9.3 mo; OS 40.5 mo; AEs: PSN 42%, nausea 35%, fatigue 34% | |
[59,60] | 329 | R/R high-risk cHL maint BV vs Pbo | 3 | 5-yr PFS rate 59% vs 41% (HR 0.52) OS: NR AEs: PSN (90% resolved) | |
[61] | 1334 | Untreated cHL CS III/IV BV + AVD vs ABVD | 3 | 2-yr mPFS rate: 82.1% vs 77.2% (HR 0.77, P = 0.04) AEs: Neutropenia 58% vs 45%, PSN 67% vs 43%, PN 1% vs 3% | |
[62] | 131 | R/R CTCL or cALCL; vs MTX or BV | 3 | ORR4: 56.3% vs 12.5% (P < 0.0001); EFS: 9.4 mo vs 2.3 mo (HR 0.28, P < 0.0001) Grade ≥ 3 AEs: 41% vs 47%; PSN: 67% vs 6% | |
[63] | 58 | R/R ALCL | 2 | ORR/CR: 86%/66%; 5-yr OS rate: 60%, 5-yr OS rate (in CR vs non-CR): 79% vs 25% | |
[64] | 601 | Untreated CD30+ sALCL; BV + CHP vs CHOP | 3 | PFS: 48.2 mo vs 20.8 mo (HR 0.71, P = 0.011); OS: NR vs NR (HR 0.66, P = 0.024) AEs: febrile neutropenia 18% vs 15%, PSN 52% vs 55% | |
Polatuzumab vedotin[65] | CD79b | 80 | R/R DLBCL; PV + R + Benda vs R + Benda | 2 | CR: 40% vs 17.5% PFS: 9.5 mo vs 3.7 mo (HR 0.63, P < 0.001) Grade ≥ 3 AEs: Anemia 28.2% vs 17.9%, Neutropenia 46.2% vs 33.3% Thrombocytopenia 41.0% vs 23.1% |
Moxetumomab-pasudotox[68] | CD22 | 80 | R/R HCL | 2 | ORR: 75% CR: 30% (85% MRD-); AEs: Edema 39%, nausea 35%, fatigue 34%, headache 33% |
Table 3 Bispecific antibody studies
Drug | Target | No. of patients | Study design | Study phase | Results |
Blinatumomab[71] | CD3/CD19 | 38 | R/R FL, MCL, DLBCL | 1 | ORR/CR: 64%/38%; PFS 6.7 mo; OS 4.6 yr; OS ( for CR/PR): 7.7 yr; AEs: Infections (pneumonia, diarrhea, sepsis) |
Mosunetuzumab[72] | CD3/CD20 | 218 | R/R B-NHL | 1 | NHL ORR/CR: 64.1%/42.2%; DLBCL ORR/CR: 34.7%/16.6% AEs: CRS 28.4%, NAEs: 44% |
CD20-TCB[73] | CD3/CD20 | 38 | R/R DLBCL | 1 | ORR/CR: 47%/34% AEs: CRS 55.1%, Neutropenia 34.7% |
Table 4 Checkpoint inhibitor studies
Drug [Ref.] | Target | No. of patients | Study design | Study phase | Results |
Nivolumab | PD-1 | ||||
[84] | 243 | R/R cHL (after ASCT) | 2 | ORR/CR: 69%/40%; PFS: 14.7 mo, Grade ≥ 3 AEs: lipase increases 5%, neutropenia 3%, ALT increases 3% | |
[88] | 61 | R/R cHL with BV | 1/2 | ORR/CR: 82%/61%; AEs: Infusion reactions 44% (BV), corticosteroid therapy 8% | |
[89] | 64 | R/R cHL Nivo + BV, Ipi + BV, Nivo + Ipi + BV | 1/2 | ORR: 89%, 76%, 82% Grade ≥ 3 AEs: 16%, 42%, 50% | |
Pembrolizumab | PD-1 | ||||
[85] | 210 | R/R cHL | 2 | ORR/CR: 69%/22.4% 6-mos DoR rate: 75.6% TRAEs: hypothyroidism 12.4%, pyrexia 10.5% | |
[86] | 304 | R/R cHL vs BV | 3 | PFS: 13.2 mo vs 8.3 mo (HR 0.65, P = 0.00271), ORR/CR: 65.6%/24.5% vs 54.2%/24.2% TRAEs: 19.6% vs 25% | |
[91] | 74 | R/R PMBCL | 2 | ORR/CR: 45%/13% DoR: NR (12.5 mo FU); Grade ≥ 3 TRAEs: 23% | |
[92] | 24 | R/R CTCL | 2 | ORR: 38%; IRAEs: 17% |
Table 5 Chimeric antigen receptor T cell studies
Drug [Ref.] | Target/co-stimulator | No. of patients | Study design | Study phase | Results |
Axicabtagene-ciloleucel[96] | CD19/CD28 | 111 | R/R DLBCL | 2 | ORR/CR: 82%/54%; DoR (FU 15.4 mo): 42%, 40% CR; 18-mos OS rate: 52% Grade ≥ 3 AEs: neutropenia 78%, CRS 13%, ICANS 28% |
Tisagenlecleucel[97] | CD19/4-1BB | 93 | R/R DLBCL | 2 | ORR/CR: 52%/40%; DoR (FU 12 mo): 65%, 79% CR; Grade ≥ 3 AEs: CRS 22%, ICANS 12%, cytopenias 28%, infections 20% |
Lisocabtagene-maraleucel[98] | CD19/4-1BB | 344 | R/R DLBCL | 2 | ORR/CR: 73%/53%; Grade ≥ 3 AEs: CRS 2%, ICANS 10% |
Brexucabtagene-autoleucel (KTE-X19)[99] | CD19/CD28 | 74 | R/R MCL | 2 | ORR/CR: 93%/67%; 1-yr PFS/ OS rate: 61%/83%; Grade ≥ 3 AEs: cytopenias 94%, infections 32%, CRS 15%, ICANS 31% |
Tisagenlecleucel[100] | CD19/4-1BB | 14 | R/R CLL | 1 | ORR/CR: 57%/28%; No relapses in CR patients (n = 4). All CR patients developed CRS |
Lisocabtagene-maraleucel[101] | CD19/4-1BB | 23 | R/R CLL (56.5% progressed after ibrutinib and venetoclax) | 1/2 | ORR/CR: 82%/45.5%; Grade ≥ 3 AEs: anemia 96%, thrombocytopenia 70%, CRS 9%, ICANS 22% |
Axicabtagene-ciloleucel[102] | CD19/CD28 | 94 | R/R FL, MZL | 2 | ORR/CR: FL 95%/80% MZL 86%/71%; Grade ≥ 3 AEs: neutropenia 33%, anemia 28%, CRS 11%, ICANS 19% |
- Citation: Popovic LS, Matovina-Brko G, Popovic M, Popovic M, Cvetanovic A, Nikolic I, Kukic B, Petrovic D. Immunotherapy in the treatment of lymphoma. World J Stem Cells 2021; 13(6): 503-520
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-0210/full/v13/i6/503.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v13.i6.503