Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Stem Cells. May 26, 2020; 12(5): 381-405
Published online May 26, 2020. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v12.i5.381
Published online May 26, 2020. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v12.i5.381
Table 1 Molecular imaging modalities
Image type | Technique | Physical principle | Tracrer | In vitro imaging | Preclincal imaging | Clinical Imaging | Spatial Resolution | Temporal resolution | Penetration depth | Sensitivity | Strengths | Limitations |
Optical imaging | BLI | Visible light | Luminescent proteins | Yes | Yes | No | 3-5 mm | Seconds to minutes | 1-2 cm | High (+++) | High sensitivity, non-radioactive, cell expansion | Low penetration depth, non-translational |
FLI | Visible or NIRF light | Proteins or fluorescent dyes | Yes | Yes | No | 2-3 mm | Seconds to minutes | < 1 cm | High (++) | High sensitivity, non-radioactive | Low penetration depth, autofluorescence | |
Nuclear imaging | PET | High-energy γ-rays | Radioisotopes [89 Zr (78.4 h), 18 F (1.83 h), 11 C (0.34 h), 64 Cu (12.7 h), 68 GA (1.13 h)] | No | Yes | Yes | 1-2 mm | Seconds to minutes | Limitless | High (++) | High penetration depth, high sensitivity | Radiation exposure, high cost |
SPECT | Low-energy γ-rays | Radioisotopes [99 mTc (6.03 h), 123 I (13.2 h), 111 In (67.4 h)] | No | Yes | Yes | 1-2 mm | Minutes | Limitless | High (++) | High penetration depth, high sensitivity | Radiation exposure, high cost | |
Magnetic imaging | MRI | Radio waves | Contrast agents | No | Yes | Yes | 0.02-0.1 mm | Minutes to hours | Limitless | Low | High penetration depth, non-radioactive, high spatial resolution | High cost, low sensitivity and contrast |
Table 2 Characteristics of the studies and the stem cells used
Ref. | Yr | Country | Cell type | Source of cells | Medium culture - %FBS |
Lim et al[33] | 2019 | South Korea | MSC | Human (adipose tissue) | DMEM - 10%FBS |
Wang et al[29] | 2019 | China | MSC | Human (umbilical cord) | EBM-2 - 0%FBS |
Yun et al[30] | 2018 | South Korea | NSC | Human (telencephalon) | NR |
Argibay et al[38] | 2017 | Spain | MSC | Rat (bone marrow) | IMDM - 10%FBS |
Duan et al[37] | 2017 | China | MSC | Rat (bone marrow) | DMEM - 10%FBS |
Lu et al[35] | 2017 | China | NPC-Imm | Mice (C17.2) | DMEM - 10%FBS |
Zhang et al[34] | 2017 | China | NSC | Rat (lateral ventricles) | StemPro NSC - 0%FBS |
Lin et al[36] | 2017 | China | MSC | Rat (bone marrow) | DMEM -10%FBS |
Zhang et al[39] | 2016 | China | NSC | Human (bone marrow) | NR |
Duan et al[40] | 2016 | China | MSC | Rat (bone marrow) | DMEM - 10%FBS |
Bai et al[42] | 2015 | China | MSC | Mice (bone marrow) | EBM-2 |
Chen et al[28] | 2015 | China | MSC | Human (umbilical cord) | DMEM-HG |
Tan et al[41] | 2015 | Japan | MSC | Rat(bone marrow) | DMEM - 10%FBS, |
Janowski et al[44] | 2014 | Poland | NSC | Human (umbilical cord) | DMEM-F12 - 2%FBS |
Park et al[43] | 2014 | South Korea | MSC | Rat | DMEM - 0%FBS |
Zhang et al[45] | 2013 | China | NPC-Imm | Mice (neonatal cerebellum) | DMEM - 10%FBS |
Tarulli et al[46] | 2013 | Canada | MSC | Rat (bone marrow) | αMEM - 20%FBS |
Liu et al[47] | 2013 | China | NSC | Rat (neonate) | DMEM-F12 |
Wang et al[48] | 2011 | China | MSC | Mice (bone marrow) | DMEM |
Lee et al[50] | 2009 | Singapore | MSC | Human (fetal bone marrow) | DMEM - 10%FBS |
Song et al[49] | 2009 | South Korea | NPC-Imm | Human (HB1.F3) | DMEM - 5%FBS |
Kim et al[51] | 2008 | South Korea | MSC | Human | DMEM - 0%FBS |
Guzman et al[52] | 2007 | United States | NSC | Human | HNCM |
Syková et al[53] | 2006 | Czech Republic | MSC, rOEC | Mice; Human; Rat | NR |
Zhu et al[54] | 2005 | United States | NSC | Human | NR |
Table 3 Characteristics of the contrast agents used in the stem cell labeling, homing and tracking analysis by molecular imaging modalities
Ref. | Contrast agent | Concentration (mg/mL) | Core/Hydrodynamic size (nm) | Coating agent | Zeta Potential (mV) | Conjugated agent (Ex/Em: nm) | Image detection mode | R1/R2 (mmol-1. Sec-1) | Developer |
Lim et al[33] | NP (BCN-Fe3O4) | NR | 20/238.9 | BCN, chitosan | +12.6 | Cy5.5 (675/695) | Dual (Mgt, NIRF) | NR/526.1 | Synthesized |
Wang et al[29] | Alkyl-SPIO | NR | NR/80-120 | Alkyl-PEI | Approximately +21.0 | NA | Dual (Mgt, BLI) | NR/549.7 | Synthesized |
Yun et al[30] | Zn0.4Fe2.6O4 (ZnMNP)12 | NR | NR | Dextran | NR | NA | Dual (Mgt, BLI) | NR | Synthesized |
Argibay et al[38] | Fe3O41 | NR | 3.7/94 | Dextran | -11.0 | NA | Mono (Mgt) | NR/701 | Synthesized |
Duan et al[37] | Fe3O4-LCP | 0.12 | 6/136 | PDLLA | +18.0 | NA | Mono (Mgt) | NR/500.2 | Synthesized |
Lu et al[35] | PAsp(DMA)-Lys-CA2 (C-NP)2 | NR | NR/64.1 | NR | +15.32 | Nile red (552/636) | Dual (Mgt, VFL) | NR/460.5 | Synthesized |
PEG-Lys-CA2 (N-NP)2 | NR/69.4 | +0.10 | NR/462.9 | ||||||
Zhang et al[34] | Ferritin2 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | Dual (Mgt, NIRF) | NR | Synthesized |
Lin et al[36] | SPION | 0.25 | NR/128 | ASP | +21.6 | NA | Mono (Mgt) | NR/296 | Synthesized |
Zhang et al[39] | SPION | NR | 30/50 | Dextran | NR | NA | Mono (Mgt) | NR/300 | Synthesized |
Duan et al[40] | Fe3O4-LCP2 | 0.12 | 6/136 | PDLLA | +18.0 | NA | Mono (Mgt) | NR/500.2 | Synthesized |
Fe3O42 | 1.00 | 6/10.8 | PLL | +32.8 | NR/457.2 | ||||
Bai et al[42] | bCD-Gd | NR | NA/24.4 | NA | NR | Cy5.5 (675/695) Rhod (565/620) | Tri (Mgt, NIRF, VFL) | 8.6/NR | Synthesized |
Chen et al[28] | GRMNB1 | NR | NA/130 | Silica | NR | NA | Dual (Mgt, BLI) | 1.21/127.89 | Synthesized |
Tan et al[41] | γ-Fe2O3 (ferucarbotran) | 27.90 | 4/60 | Carboxydextran | NR | NA | Mono (Mgt) | NR | Resovist®, Fujifilm RI Pharma Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan |
Janowski et al[44] | Fe3O4 | 2.00 | 8/35 | Dextran | +31.0 | Rhod (565/620) | Dual (Mgt, VFL) | 30.4/75.8 | BioPAL Inc, Worcester, MA, USA |
Park et al[43] | PCION | NR | 11/371.6 | PEG | +28.6 | Rhod (565/620) | Dual (Mgt, VFL) | NR | Synthesized |
Zhang et al[45] | fmSiO4@SPIONs | NR | 30/151 30/148 | Silica | -22.5 | FITC (490/525) | Dual (Mgt, VFL) | NR/309.53 | Synthesized |
NR/231.74 | |||||||||
fdSiO4@SPIONs | -38.0 | ||||||||
Tarulli et al[46] | Fe3O4 (MPIO) | NR | NR/900 | DBP | < 0 | DGF (480/520) | Dual (Mgt, VFL) | NR | NR |
Liu et al[47] | SPION | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | Mono (Mgt) | NR | NR |
Wang et al[48] | Fe3O4 (PMNC) | NR | 8/120 | Silica | -38.0 | Rhod (565/620) | Dual (Mgt, VFL) | 3.81/435 | Synthesized |
Lee et al[50] | MGIO | NR | 5/602 | PMG | NR | NA | Mono (Mgt) | NR | Synthesized |
Song et al[49] | FeO1.44 (Feridex) | 11.20 | 5-6/50-180 | Dextran | -12.0 | NA | Mono (Mgt) | 23.9/98.3 | Advanced Magnetic, Cambridge, MA, United States |
Kim et al[51] | FeO1.44 (Feridex) | 11.2 | 5-6/50-180 | Dextran | -12 | NA | Mono (Mgt) | 23.9/98.3 | Advanced Magnetic, Cambridge, MA, United States |
Guzman et al[52] | FeO1.44 (Feridex) | 11.2 | 5-6/50-180 | Dextran | -12 | NA | Mono (Mgt) | 23.9/98.3 | Berlex Laboratories, Wayne, NJ, United States |
Syková et al[53] | Fe3O4 (Endorem) | 15.8 | 4.3-5.6/150 | Dextran | -12 | NA | Mono (Mgt) | 40/160 | Guerbet, Roissy, France |
Zhu et al[54] | FeO1.44 (Feridex) | 11.2 | 5-6/50-180 | Dextran | -12 | NA | Mono (Mgt) | 23.9/98.3 | Advanced Magnetic, Cambridge, MA, United States |
Table 4 Stem cell labeling process
Ref. | Cells | Passage | Contrast agent | Concen-tration μg/mL) | Incu-bation time (h) | Strategy of interna-lization | Effici-ency | Quantification | Cellular viability | Others analysis | |||
(pgFe/cell) | Technique | Method | Results | ||||||||||
Lim et al[33] | MSC | P5-P7 | NP(BCN-Fe3O4) | 300 | 2 | Ac4ManNAz | 98.7% | 15.3 | ICP-MS | CCK-8 assay | > 95% | CF, SEM, CEM, MRI | |
Wang et al[29] | MSC | P2-P7 | Alkyl-SPIO | an appropriate amount of Alkyl-PEI/SPIO (N/P = 20) | 6 | PEI | High Eff. | NA | NA | CCK-8 assay | > 90% | BLI, MRI | |
Yun et al[30] | NSC | NR | ZnMNP | 50 | NR | PLL: 1.5 g/mL | NR | 4.6 | NR | NA | NA | TEM, BLI | |
Argibay et al[38] | MSC | P0-P2, P9, P17 | Fe3O4 | 100 | 24 | PLL: 1.5 μg/mL | High Eff. | 0.9-7.7 | ICP-OES | LDH assay | NSD | TEM | |
Duan et al[37] | MSC | P3-P5 | Fe3O4-LCP | 15 | 1.5 | PEI | Approximately 100% | Approximately 9 | AAS | CCK-8 assay | > 90% | TEM, MRI | |
Lu et al[35] | NPC | NR | C-NP | 10 | 4 | PLL and Lipofectamin | Approximately 99.3% | NA | NA | CCK-8 assay | > 95% | MRI, VFL | |
N-NP | Approximately 8.7% | ||||||||||||
Zhang et al[34] | NSC | P2-P3 | Ferritin | MOI: 10 | 24 | PLL | Approximately 63% | 3.5 | AAS | CCK-8 assay | NSD | TEM, MRI, PB | |
Lin et al[36] | MSC | P5-P9 | ASP-SPION | 30 | 1 | NA | Approximately 100% | 2.68 | AAS | CCK-8 assay | > 90% | MRI, TEM | |
Zhang et al[39] | NSC | NR | Anti-CD15-SPION | NR | NR | NA | NR | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
Duan et al[40] | MSC | P3-P5 | Fe3O4-LCP | 15 | 1.5 | PEI | LCP > PLL | 8.373 | AAS | CCK-8 assay | > 90% | TEM, in vitro MRI | |
Fe3O4 | 25 | 24 | PLL | 9.214 | |||||||||
Bai et al[42] | MSC | NR | bCD-Gd | 2 μmol | 24 | PLL | NR | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
Chen et al[28] | MSC | NR | GRMNB | 10 | 2 | NR | High Eff. | 33.62 | AAS | MTT | 87.6 | BLI | |
Tan et al[41] | MSC | NR | Ferucarbotran | NR | 24 | NA | Approximately 95% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
Janowski et al[44] | NSC | NR | Fe3O4 | 25 | 48 | PLL: 375 ng/mL | NR | NA | NA | NI | NI | NA | |
Park et al[43] | MSC | NR | PCION | 1 | 0.25 | PLL, EMF | NR | NA | NA | NA | NA | TEM, MRI | |
Zhang et al[45] | NPC | NA | fmNP | 5, 10, 20, 33 | 0.5, 1, 2, 3 | NA | fmNP > fdNP | 5-30 | ICP-AES | CCK-8 assay | 90%-98% | TB | |
fdNP | 1-2.5 | NA | NA | NA | |||||||||
Tarulli et al[46] | MSC | NR | MPIO | 18.8 | 24 | NA | 95% | 54 | Flow cytometry | Flow cytometry | Approximately 94% | CF | |
Liu et al[47] | NSC | NR | SPION | 14 | 24 | NA | NR | NR | NR | NI | NI | NA | |
Wang et al[48] | MSC | NR | PMNC | 0.5 mmol | 1 | NA | Approximately 100% | 16-20 | ICP-OES | CCK-8 assay | > 95% | TEM, CF, MRI | |
Lee et al[50] | MSC | P5, P6 | MGIO | 50 | 24 | NA | Approximately 97% | 33.3 | ICP-OES | NI | > 95% | TEM, microarray | |
Song et al[49] | NPC | NR | Feridex | 112.4 | 72 | NA | Approximately 100% | 0.2 | AAS | TB | Unaffected | MRI | |
Kim et al[51] | MSC | NR | Feridex | 1 | 12-16 | PS | NR | 2.6 | ICP/MS | NI | NI | NA | |
Guzman et al[52] | NSC | NR | Feridex | 5 | 24 | PS: 2.5 μg/mL | 98% | Halved every 3 d (%) | Semiquantitative (MRI) | Cell counting | Approximately 92% | NA | |
Syková et al[53] | MSC, rOEC | NR | Endorem | 112.4 | 48-72 | NA | NR | NA | NA | NA | NA | TEM | |
Zhu et al[54] | NSC | NR | Feridex | NR | 1 | Effectene | High Eff. | NA | NA | NR | NI | NA |
Table 5 Stroke models induced by filament intraluminal middle cerebral artery, brain injury evaluation and animal features
Ref. | Ischemia mechanism | Animals | n / N | Ischemia type | Ischemia time (min) | Filament type | Anesthesia | Brain induction area (AP; ML to bregma in mm) | Blood flow analysis | Injury evaluation | ||||
Specie | Type | Sex | Weight (g) | Age (wk) | ||||||||||
Yun et al[30] | MCAo | Rat | SD | M | 240-260 | Adult1 | 3-8/50 | T | 30 | 3-0 nylon suture | NR | MNI | NI | TTC, MRI |
Argibay et al[38] | MCAo | Rat | Wistar | M | 280-300 | NR | 6/133 | T | 45 | silicon rubber- | 3%-4% sevoflurane | MNI | Laser-Doppler | MRI |
Duan et al[37] | MCAo | Rat | SD | M | 250-280 | Adult1 | 6/54 | NR | NR | NR | NR | MNI | NI | MRI |
Lu et al[35] | MCAo | Rat | SD | NR | NR | NR | 6/12 | T | 90 | 4-0 nylon suture, silicone coated tip | 1% halothane | MNI | NI | MRI |
Zhang et al[34] | MCAo | Rat | SD | NR | 250-280 | Adult1 | NR/30 | T | 120 | NR | PB (40 mg/kg) | MNI | NI | MRI |
Lin et al[36] | MCAo | Rat | SD | M | 250-280 | Adult1 | 6/18 | T | 120 | NR | NR | MNI | NI | MRI |
Zhang et al[39] | MCAo | Mice | C57BL/6J | NR | 20-25 | 8 | NR/45 | T | 20 | Nylon poly-1-lysinecoated | PB (6 mL/kg) | MNI | NI | MRI |
Duan et al[40] | MCAo | Rat | SD | M | NR | Adult1 | NR/24 | NR | NR | NR | NR | MNI | NI | MRI |
Chen et al[28] | MCAo | Mice | C57BL/6J | M | 25-30 | Adult1 | NR/NR | T | 120 | square knot using a 10 suture | CH (0.4 g/kg) | zygoma/squamosal bone | NI | MRI |
Tan et al[41] | Lacunar infarction | Rat | Wistar | M | 240-260 | NR | NR/22 | P | NA | NA | 2%-4% ISO | 0; 3 | NI | MRI |
Zhang et al[45] | MCAo | Mice | CD1 | F | NR | 4 | NR/NR | P | NA | 6-0 rounded tip nylon | NR | MNI | NI | MRI |
Park et al[43] | MCAo | Rat | SD | NR | 250-280 | NR | 8/16 | T | 120 | Micro clip 24 mm | Rompum (10 mg/kg) + Zoletil (30 mg/kg) | MNI | NI | MRI |
Liu et al[47] | MCAo | Rat | SD | M | 160-180 | NR | 6-8/48 | NR | NR | Nylon | 10% CH (300 mg/kg) | MNI | NI | MRI |
Wang et al[48] | MCAo | Mice | CD1 | F | NR | 4 | 7/21 | T | 180 | 6-0 rounded tip nylon | NR | NI | NI | MRI |
Song et al[49] | MCAo | Rat | SD | M | 250-300 | NR | 3/6 | T | 120 | NR | 4% ISO | MNI | NI | MRI |
Kim et al[51] | MCAo | Rat | SD | M | 250-300 | NR | 2-6/13 | P | NA | NR | ket. (80-100 mg/kg) + AM (5 mg/kg) | MNI | EEG | MRI |
Guzman et al[52] | MCAo | Rat | SD | M | NR | Adult1 | 5/10 | P | NA | NA | ISO | MNI + rhinal fissure | NI | MRI |
Global | Mice | NOD-SCID | NR | NR | 0-1PN | 12-16/28 | T | 5-10 | NA | Cryoanestrhetized | NA | NI | MRI |
Table 6 Stroke models induced by the photothrombosis of middle cerebral artery, brain injury evaluation and animal features
Ref. | Ischemia mechanism | Animals | n / N | Photosensitizer - rose bengal (dose; via) | Laser application parameters | Anesthesia | Brain induction area(AP; ML to Bregma in mm) | Injury evaluation | |||||||
Specie | Type | Sex | Weight(g) | Age (wk) | Time (min) | Diameter (mm) | Wavelengh (nm) | Power (W) | |||||||
Lim et al[33] | PT | Mice | Balb/c nude | M | 20-25 | 10 | 3-5/19 | 10 mg/mL; penile vein | 16 | NR | 561 | NR | Zoletil (50-30 mg/kg i.p.) | 0.5; 2.5 | MRI, NIRF, TTC |
Wang et al[29] | PT | Mice | Balb/c nude | F | 20-23 | 8 | 4-6/39 | 100 mg/kg | 15 | 4 | NR | NR | PB (50 mg/kg i.p) | -2.0; 2.0 | MRI |
Bai et al[42] | PT | Mice | Db/Db | M | NR | 8 | 4/8 | 100 mg/kg; i.p. | 15 | NR | NR | NR | 1% ISO | 0.0; 2.0 | MRI, NIRF |
Mice | Wild type | M | NR | 8 | 10/20 | 100 mg/kg; i.p. | 15 | NR | NR | NR | 1% ISO | 0.0; 2.0 | MRI, NIRF | ||
Tarulli et al[46] | Focal devascularization | Rat | Long Evans | M | NR | 8-12 | 3/9 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | ISO + Ketoprofen | 3.0/-4.0; 1.5/4.5 | MRI |
Lee et al[50] | PT | Rat | Wistar | F | NR | NR | NR/22 | 7.5 mg/mL; tail vein | 10 | 3 | 603 | 60 | Ket. (7.5 mg/100 g) + Xyl. (1 mg/100 g) | -2.0; -3.0 | MRI, TTC |
Syková et al[53] | Photochemical | Rat | Wistar | M | NR | 8-12 | NR/NR | NR | NA | NA | NA | NA | NR | NI | MRI |
Table 7 Magnetic resonance imaging features for stem cell homing evaluation
Ref. | Equipment system | Analysis software | MF (Tesla) | Sequence | Weighted images (TR/TE; ms) | FOV; MT; ST (mm) | Homing evaluation time |
Lim et al[33] | PC - Agilent Technologies | ImageJ (NIH) | 9.4 | T2 | T2: 4000/32.5 | NA; NA; 1.0 | 1, 3, 7, 10, 14 d |
Wang et al[29] | PC - PharmaScan - Bruker | ImageJ (NIH) | 7.0 | TSE FLASH GRE | T2: 3000/NA | 20 × 20; 256 × 256; 1.0 | 1, 3, 7 d |
ParaVision (Bruker) | T2*: 159.4/5 | 55 × 55; 256 × 256; 1.0 | |||||
Yun et al[30] | Philips Medical Systems; an animal coil | NA | 3.0 | FSE | T2: 4000/80 | 50; 256 × 256; 0.5 | 1 d, 3 w |
Argibay et al[38] | PC - Bio Spec - Bruker; surface coil array | ImageJ (NIH) | 9.4 | MGE | T2*: 2.9/1.5 | 19.2 × 19.2; 192 × 192; 1.0 | 4 h |
Duan et al[37] | Achieva - Philips Medical Systems; 4-channel rat coil | ImageJ (NIH) | 3.0 | FSE | T2: 800/60 | 60; 256 × 256; 1.0 | 1-4, 6-8 wk |
FFE | T2*: 500/18 | ||||||
Lu et al[35] | Achieva - Philips Medical Systems; 4-channel rat coil | NA | 3.0 | FSE | T2: 200/31 | 60 × 60; 267 × 268; 1.0 | 1, 3, 7, 14 d |
FFE | T2*: 500/18 | ||||||
Zhang et al[34] | Achieva - Philips Medical Systems | ImageJ (NIH) | 3.0 | FSE | T2: 800/60 | 60 × 60; 256 × 256; 1.0 | 1-6 wk |
PDW | PDW: 3000/20 | ||||||
FFE | T2*: 500/18 | ||||||
Lin et al[36] | Intera - Philips Medical Systems | ImageJ (NIH) | 3.0 | Multi SE | T2: 2000/20-80 | 80 × 80; 160 × 266; 2.0 | 1-6 wk |
Zhang et al[39] | PC - PharmaScan - Bruker | ImageJ (NIH) | 7.0 | Turbo RARE | T2: 6000/ 60 | 30; 256 × 256; 0.5 | 2 d, 8 d |
FLASH GRE | T2*: 400/3.5 | ||||||
Duan et al[40] | Achieva - Philips Medical Systems | ImageJ (NIH) | 3.0 | FSE | T2: 800/60 | 60; 256 × 256; 1.0 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 wk |
PDW | PDW: 3000/20 | ||||||
FFE | T2*: 500/18 | ||||||
Bai et al[42] | PC - PharmaScan - Bruker | ImageJ (NIH) | 7.0 | SE | T1: 500/15 | 20 × 20; 256 × 256; 1.0 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 14 d |
FSE | T2: 2000/50 | ||||||
Chen et al[28] | PC - Bio Spec - Bruker | ImageJ (NIH) | 7.0 | RARE SE | T2: 3000/50 | 25.6; 256 × 256; 0.7 | 3 d, 7 d, 14 d |
Tan et al[41] | PC - Unity INOVA, Varian | NR | 7.0 | SE | T2: 2500/60 | 30 × 30; 512 × 512; NR | 1-42 d |
Janowski et al[44] | Sonata Maestro Class - Siemens; 8-channel head coil | Osirix (Pixmeo) Amira (Visage Imaging) | 1.5 | SWI | T2*: 49/40 | 230; 168 × 256; 1.6 | 1 d, 1 wk, 1 mo, 2 mo, 4 mo |
Park et al[43] | Achieva - Philips Medical Systems; animal coil | NA | 3.0 | SE | T2: 11000/125 | NA; 284 × 286; 0.7 | 0 h, 2 d |
Zhang et al[45] | Sigma - GE Healthcare; a human head coil | NA | 3.0 | FSE | T2: 5840/104 | 45 × 45; 256 × 256; 1.5-2.0 | 1 d, 3 d |
Map MSME SE | T2: 3500/20-160 | ||||||
Tarulli et al[46] | Sigma - GE Healthcare | NA | 3.0 | FSE | T2: 4500/35-75 | 40 × 40 × 17; 256 × 256; 1.0 | 1 d, 7 d, 14 d |
3D-SPGR | T2*: 25/7 | 40 × 40 × 20; 256 × 256; 1.0 | |||||
Liu et al[47] | Sigma - GE Healthcare; a rat coil | 3.0 | T2* | T2*: 2560/6.8 | 6.0; NR; 1.6 | 1, 7, 21 d | |
Wang et al[48] | Sigma - GE Healthcare | NA | 3.0 | FSE | T2: 5840/104 | 45 × 45; 256 × 256; 1.5 | 1, 7, 30 d |
Lee et al[50] | Sigma - GE Healthcare; a clinical coil | NA | 1.5 | TSE | T2: 2000/81 | 90; 192 × 192; 1.5 | 0, 1, 5, 12 d |
GRE | 280/20 | 20; 160 × 160; 1.5 | |||||
Song et al[49] | Sigma - GE Healthcare | NA | 1.5 | T2 | T2: 3500/80 | 60 × 60; 256 × 160; 2.0 | 1d, 3d, 1-4 wk |
3D GRE | T2*: 50/20 | 80 × 80; 256 × 160; 2.0 | |||||
Kim et al[51] | PC - Bio Spec - Bruker | NA | 4.7 | SE | T1: 600/14 | 40 × 30; 256 × 192; 1.0 | 2 d, 1 w, 2 w...10 wk |
RARE | T2: 5000/90 | ||||||
FLASH | T2*: 758 × 30 | ||||||
Guzman et al[52] | PC - Varian Medical Systems | NA | 4.7 | SE | T2: 2500/45 | 40; 256 × 256; 1.0 | 2 d, 7 d, 35 d |
3D GRE | T2*: 600/5 | 30 × 30 × 30; 128× 128 × 128 | |||||
Syková et al[53] | PC - Bio Spec-Bruker | NA | 4.7 | FGE | T2: NA | NA | 1 d, 1-7 wk |
Zhu et al[54] | Sigma - GE Healthcare | NA | 3.0 | SE | T2: 200/20 | NA | 1 d, 7 d |
Table 8 Near-infrared fluorescence imaging features for stem cell homing evaluation
Ref. | Agent | Equipment | Software | Excitation / Emission wavelength (nm) | Time of exposition | Follow-up |
Lim et al[33] | DBCO-Cy5.5 | IVIS Lumina Series III (PerkinElmer) | Living Image (PerkinElmer) | 670/NA | 1 min | In vivo at 1, 3, 7, 10, 14 d; ex vivo at 2, 27, 30, 33, 36 h |
Zhang et al[34] | LV-FTH-EGFP | small animal in vivo FLI system (in vivo FxPro; Carestream) | MI (Carestream) | 487/509 | NA | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 wk |
Bai et al[42] | Cy5-5 | Maestro in vivo imaging system (CRi, Woburn) | Maestro v. 2.10.0 | 675/695 | NA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 14 d |
Table 9 Bioluminescence imaging features for stem cell homing evaluation
Ref. | Lentiviral vector | Equipment | Software | Substrate | Dose | Image acquisition | Follow-up |
Wang et al[29] | Luc2/eGFP | IVIS Lumina Series III (Perkin-Elmer) | NR | D-luciferin (Promega, United States) | 100 mL (30 mg/mL) | 10 min after injection | 1 d, 3 d, 7 d |
Yun et al[30] | Fluc/eGFP | IVIS® Spectrum imaging system (Perkin Elmer) | NR | D-luciferin (Promega, United States) | 150 mg/kg | NR | 1 d, 1 wk, 3 wk |
Chen et al[28] | Luc/GFP | IVIS Imaging System 200 Series (Caliper) | Living Image 3.0 (Xenogen Corp.) | D-luciferin (Caliper) | 270 mg/g | 15 min after injection | 0, 14 d |
Table 10 Stem cell administration, homing and cellular therapeutic efficiency
Ref. | Cell Type | Immuno-genicity | Time from stroke (h) | Cell administration | Groups | Follow-up | Outcome | |||||
Route | Number | Volume (µL) | Behavior | Infarct volume | Mole-cular proteins/others | Cells mi-gration | ||||||
Lim et al[33] | MSC | XNG | NR | IC-CTL | 1 × 106 | 5 | Stroke + cells vs Stroke-cells | 1, 3, 7, 10, 14 d | NR | (+) | NR | (+) |
Wang et al[29] | MSC | XNG | 24 | ITC1 | 5 × 105 | 100 | Alkyl-SPIO/siPHD2 > Alkyl-SPIO/si | 1, 3, 7 d | (+) mNSS; FFT at 14 d | (+) 7 d | (+) Ki67; CD31 -7 d; (+) NeuN -14 d | (+) |
MSC | XNG | 24 | ITC1 | 5 × 105 | 100 | Alkyl-SPIO/si vs saline | 1, 3, 7 d | (+) mNSS; FFT at 14 d | (-) 7 d | (+) Ki67; CD31 -7 d; (+) NeuN -14 d | (+) | |
Yun et al[30] | NSC | XNG | 24 | IA-IC | 3 × 106 | 100 | Mag-Cells > UL-Cells/sa-line | 0, 3, 5, 7, 21 d | (+) Cilinder at 21d | NR | (+) MAP2; Nestin; GFAP; TuJ1 -7d | (+) |
Argibay et al[38] | MSC | ALG | 8 | IA; IV-jugular | 2 × 105; 1 × 106 | 300 | D-MNP-labeled MSC (IA × IV) | 4, 24, 72 h | (-) Cilinder | (-) at 14d | (-) CD31; Ki67; DCX | (+) |
Duan et al[37] | MSC | ALG | 48 | IC-CTL | 5 × 105 | 3 | Labeled cell > UL-cells | 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 wk | (-) mNSS | (-) | (-) TUNNEL (-) GFP | (+) |
Labeled/UL vs control | 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 wk | (+) mNSS at 3, 4, 6, 8 wk | (+) at 4, 6, 8 wk | (+) TUNNEL 7-21 d, (+) GFP 7-21 d | (+) | |||||||
Lu et al[35] | NPC | ALG | NR | IC-IPS | 5 × 105 | 2.5 | labeling with N-NPS | 0, 3, 7, 14 d | NR | (+) | (+) Nestin | (+) low |
labeling with C-NP | 0, 3, 7, 14 d | NR | (+) | (+) Nestin | (+) | |||||||
Zhang et al[34] | NSC | XNG | 48 | IC-CTL | 5 × 105 | 3 | FTH-EGFP-NSC > non trans-ducec NSC | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 wk | (+) mNSS at 1-6 wk | (+) at 1-6 wk | (+) GFAP; Nestin; CD11b at 6 wk | (+) |
Lin et al[36] | MSC | ALG | 48 | IC-CTL | 5 × 105 | NR | ASP-SPION vs UL vs PBS | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 wk | (-) mNSS | (-) | (-) GFAP; NeuN; CD11 | (+) |
Zhang et al[39] | NSC | XNG | 7d | IC-CTL | NR | 7 | Stroke pure > Stroke + Ara-C | 0, 2, 8 d | NR | (+) at 8 d | (+) CD15+; Nestin at 8 d | (+) |
Duan et al[40] | MSC | ALG | 48 | IC-CTL | 5 × 105 | 3 | PLL-SPION or PM > UL | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 wk | NR | (+) at 4, 6 wk | (-) GFP | (+) |
Bai et al[42] | MSC | XNG | 24 | IA - IC | 1 × 106 | 100 | DM + RWJ + cell > DM + cells | 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 14 d | NR | (+) | (+) p38 MAPK at 7 d | (+)2 |
Chen et al[28] | MSC | XNG | 30 min | IV-femoral | 5 × 105 | Mag-cells > UL-cells | 0, 3, 7, 14 d | (+) VM at 14, 28 d | (+) at 14 d | (+) TuJ1; NeuN; GFAP at 28 d; (+) RT-PCR1 at 28 d | (+) | |
Tan et al[41] | MSC | ALG | 7 d | IC-CTL | 5 × 105 | 10 | Stroke + cells over time | 0, 1, 7, 14, 21, 42 d | NR | NR | (-) GFP and NeuN at 7 d; (+) GFP and NeuN at 6 wk | (+) |
Janowski et al[44] | NSC | AuTL | NR | IC | 2 × 104 | 10 | Case over time | 0, 1, 7, 60, 120 d, 33 mo | NR | NR | NR | (+) |
Park et al[43] | MSC | XNG | 14d | IC-CTL | 6 × 105 | 5 | Pcion/pDNA MSC vs control | 1, 2 d | NR | (-) | NR | (+) |
Zhang et al[45] | NPC | ALG | 24 | IC-CTL | 5 × 105 | 5 | fsiSPION-NPC vs control | 1, 3 d | NR | (+) | (+) Nestin | (+)2 |
NPC | ALG | 24 | IV-tail | 1 × 106 | 300 | fsiSPION-NPC vs control | 1, 3 d | NR | NR | (+) Nestin | (+) | |
Tarulli et al[46] | MSC | XNG | 72 | IV-tail | 3 × 106 | 700 | MPIO-BMSC vs UL-BMSC | 1, 7, 14 d | NR | NR | NR | (+) |
Liu et al[47] | NSC | XNG | NR | IC-CTL | 3 × 104 | 5 | Stroke + NSC_FA > Stroke + NSC | 1, 7 d | NR | NR | (+) Sox-2 BrdU at 21 d | (+) |
Wang et al[48] | MSC | XNG | 7d | IC-CTL | 1 × 105 | 5 | FMNC-MSC > UL-MSC vs control (FMNC) | 0, 1, 7, 30 d | NR | NR | (+) TuJ1 | (+) |
Lee et al[50] | MSC | XNG | 48 | IC-CTL | 2 × 104 | 5 | M600-MSC vs FC-MSC | 1, 5, 12 d | NR | NR | NR | (+) |
MSC | XNG | 48 | IV-tail | 2 × 106 | 500 | M600-MSC vs control | 5, 12 d | NR | NR | NR | (+) | |
Song et al[49] | NPC | XNG | 24 | IC-IPS | 4 × 105 | 5 | FO-NPC vs control | 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28 d | NR | NR | (+) BrdU; GFAP at 28 d | (+) |
NPC | XNG | 24 | IV-tail | 4 × 106 | 500 | FO-NPC vs control | 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28 d | NR | NR | (+) BrdU; GFAP at 28 d | (+) | |
Kim et al[51] | MSC | AuTL | 7d | IC-IPS/CTL | 1 × 105 | 2 | Feridex®-labeled hMSC over time for both vias | 2d, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 wk | NR | NR | (-) GFAP; TH; MAP2; TuJ1; Nestin at 10 wk | (+) |
Guzman et al[52] | NSC | XNG | 7d | IC-CTL | 3 × 105/5 × 104 | NSC-SCns-SPION | 3, 9, 12,18 wk | NR | NR | (+) SC121 or SC101; TuJ1; GFAP; MAP2 at 18 wk | (+) | |
Syková et al[53] | rOEC | ALG | NR | IC-CTL | NR | NR | OEC-SPION over time | 3-7 wk | NR | NR | (+) NeuN; GFAP at 28 d | (+) |
MSC | XNG | NR | IV-femoral | NR | NR | MSC over time | 6-30 d | NR | NR | (+) NeuN; GFAP at 28 d | (+) | |
Zhu et al[54] | NSC | AuTL | NR | IC | NR | NR | Patients treat with NSC and no treat | 2 yr | (+) SEP and DRS at 6, 9 mo | (+) cells uptake by PET at 3, 6 mo | NI | (+) |
- Citation: Nucci MP, Filgueiras IS, Ferreira JM, de Oliveira FA, Nucci LP, Mamani JB, Rego GNA, Gamarra LF. Stem cell homing, tracking and therapeutic efficiency evaluation for stroke treatment using nanoparticles: A systematic review. World J Stem Cells 2020; 12(5): 381-405
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-0210/full/v12/i5/381.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v12.i5.381