Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Stem Cells. Jul 26, 2019; 11(7): 421-430
Published online Jul 26, 2019. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v11.i7.421
Table 1 Some weak and strong points of induced pluripotent stem cells technology
Weak points
Strong points
LimitationsPossible solutionsStrengthsFurther improvements
Slow, inefficient and variable reprogramming processBanking of fully characterized iPSCEasy reprogramming process to implementReduce time, and increase efficiency and consistency of reprogramming
Differential gene expression in comparison to ESCImprove the reprogramming using other combinations of reprogramming factorsStrong proliferation capacityEstablish culture conditions promoting genome stability
Variable X inactivation status and genome instabilityTest for X inactivation, sequencing to check for genome integrityAllogenic and personalized cell therapyEliminate mutagenic potential and differential gene expression due to reprogramming
Point mutationsWhole genome sequencing to verify the absence of mutations - Possible correction by genome editing - Use cell source for reprogramming less susceptible to resist to mutationsModel human diseases, including cancer, and test patient-specific pharmacotherapiesEstablish cells (tissues) with the adequate phenotypes characterizing the disease of interest
Immunotolerance of iPSC-derived cellsPreventive immunosuppressionMay reverse cells agingUnderstanding better the molecular mechanisms of partial reprogramming and aging markers
Differentiation protocols must be optimized to obtain iPSC-derived cells of interestMany protocols have already been tested and publishedOriginate immune cells and use iPSC as vaccines to develop immunotherapies against cancerIncrease the variety of immune cells that can be reprogrammed
Potential tumorigenic hazardUse differentiated and purified cellsPluripotent cellsPrepare functional organs