05292747

June 03, 2024, 03:12

Reader’s expertise on the topic of the manuscript

Does the reader have a conflict of interest?

The overall quality of the manuscript, based on the above-listed criteria, should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories

Language quality (style, grammar, and spelling) should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories.

Bone regeneration is a complex process requiring precise coordination of various cellular activities, including inflammation regulation, angiogenesis, and osteogenesis. Zhang et al.’s innovative approach utilizing BMSC-exos embedded in hydrogels addresses the critical need for effective bone repair strategies, particularly in the context of large bone defects, which are notoriously challenging for orthopedic surgeons to manage [1]. Study Highlights The authors successfully fabricated a multifunctional hydrogel system capable of delivering BMSC-exos to the site of injury. This system demonstrated a robust capacity to modulate macrophage polarization towards an anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype, thereby creating a conducive environment for bone healing. Additionally, the incorporation of BMSC-exos significantly enhanced both angiogenesis and osteogenic differentiation in vitro, demonstrating the dual-role capability of BMSC-exos in directing cell fate. This was evidenced by increased migration and expression of both angiogenic and osteogenic markers in mouse osteoblast progenitor cells (mOPCSs). The hydrogel’s effectiveness was further validated in a murine fracture model, where it promoted significant bone regeneration and functional vascularization, underscoring its potential for clinical application. Value and Limitations In Figures 4E, 4F, and Figures 5G, 5H, showing that hydrogel + BMSC-exo promoted both osteogenesis and angiogenesis in mOPCSs, present intriguing findings that merit further research into the cellular fate transitions. Exosomes have been shown to play a dual role in promoting various differentiation pathways. For instance, exosomes derived from neural stem cells have been reported to regulate the differentiation of recipient neural stem cells into both neurons and glial cells, highlighting their versatility in neurogenesis [2, 3]. Similarly, tumor-associated macrophage-derived exosomes have been found to influence tumor progression by promoting both angiogenesis and immune cell modulation[4]. Exosomes from bone marrow stromal cells enhanced both osteogenic differentiation and angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo via releasing exosomal miR-1260a [5]. These evidence underscores the multifaceted roles of exosomes in cellular differentiation and intercellular communication, where the ability to direct multiple differentiation pathways can be particularly advantageous. While the study provides evidence for the efficacy of BMSC-exo hydrogels in bone regeneration, it also highlights several areas for further investigation: First, the lack of detailed descriptions for many experiments makes it challenging to replicate these studies. The authors mentioned, “For Transwell assays, after transfection and treatment with high glucose, mOPCSs with different treatments were seeded into the upper chamber of 12-well Transwell plates (2.5 × 10^3 cells/well).” It is unclear why the mOPCSs were transfected and treated with high glucose. The migration settings, including the dose of exosomes, location (upper chamber/lower chamber), and timing, should be described clearly. In the angiogenesis assay, the authors cultured mOPCSs cell-loaded hydrogel for 14 days, which is relatively long. It would be beneficial to assess cell viability after this period. Additionally, the purpose of setting up mOPCSs cell-loaded hydrogel needs clarification, especially as the study aims to demonstrate the osteogenic effects of hydrogel+BMSC-exo. The process of adding BMSC-exo during this experiment should be explicitly stated. The statement “When co-cultured with HUVECs, mOPCSs incubated on hydrogel + BMSC-exo exhibited enhanced proliferation and tube formation (Figure 5C and D)” lacks details. It is necessary to specify how the co-culture was performed and whether HUVECs or mOPCSs formed the tubes. The difference between Figure 4B and Figure 5E is unclear. The protein expression detection in Figure 6F should include details on the detection method and the tissue type analyzed. In Supplementary Figure 1, the authors claim that the hydrogel exerted no side effects on biological processes, including osteogenesis, chondrogenesis, or adipogenesis. However, the experiment lacks details such as the dose of hydrogel added and the inclusion of control groups. Including different hydrogel doses and their effects on cell viability and proliferation would strengthen the findings. The authors mentioned, “the vital organs of mice were also not influenced by hydrogel treatment.” This experiment lacks details on how the hydrogel was administered and the time points for examination. Most importantly, the selection of control groups does not adequately highlight the benefits of hydrogel+BMSC-exo compared to BMSC-exo alone. In Figure 4, the authors showed that hydrogel+BMSC-exo enhanced cell proliferation, migration, and osteogenesis compared to hydrogel alone. However, a BMSC-exo control group should be included to demonstrate the synergistic effects of hydrogel+BMSC-exo. Similar considerations apply to Figures 5 and 6. The in vivo experiments did not evaluate the inflammation status, which is crucial for understanding the complete impact of the hydrogel+BMSC-exo treatment on the bone healing process. There are minor typographical errors, such as in Figure 1E, where “PKH-26” should be used.

First, thank you very much for your professional comments on the article published in World Journal of Stem Cells. Second, we read your comments with great interest. You are welcome to format your valuable comments into a Letter to the Editor and submit it online to World Journal of Stem Cells at https://www.f6publishing.com. There are no restrictions on the number of words, figures (color, B/W) or authors for a Letter to the Editor. In addition, the article processing charge will be exempted for this Letter to the Editor. As with all articles published by the Baishideng Publishing Group, the Letter to the Editor will be published online after completing peer review. The guidelines for a Letter to the Editor can be found at: https://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/GerInfo/219. Finally, we look forward to receiving your high-quality Letter to the Editor, which will promote academic communication and lead the development of this discipline.