Copyright
©The Author(s) 2001.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 15, 2001; 7(5): 612-621
Published online Oct 15, 2001. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v7.i5.612
Published online Oct 15, 2001. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v7.i5.612
Table 1 New technology available for colorectal surgeons
INVESTIGATION |
Modern endoscopes |
Virtual colonoscopy |
Trans-rectal ultrasound |
Magnetic resonance imaging |
Positron emission tomography |
Radioimmunoscintigraphy |
INTERVENTION |
Colonic stents |
Transanal endoscopic microsurgery |
Minimally invasive surgery |
Radiofrequency ablation |
Robotics |
OUTCOME |
Artificial neural networks |
Table 2 Rectal cancer staging by TRUS and MRI[24]
TRUS (%) | MRI (%) | |
T stage accuracy | 80 | 85 |
N stage sensitivity | 72 | 81 |
N stage specificity | 80 | 66 |
Table 3 Rectal cancer staging by TRUS, MRI and CT[20]
Accuracy of detection | TRUS (%) | MRI (%) | CT (%) |
Depth of invasion | 81 | 81 | 65 |
Lymph node metastases | 63 | 63 | 56 |
Table 4 Advantages of laparoscopic colectomy compared to open colectomy
Mean | Laparoscopic colectomy | Open colectomy |
Narcotic use (days) | 2.7 | 4.8 |
Ileus (days) | 3.9 | 5.9 |
Hospital stay (days) | 6.5 | 10.2 |
Lev-Chelouche | Neary | |
Number | 46 | 21 |
Distance from dentate line (cm) | 3-18 (mean 7) | 5-17 (mean 10) |
Size (cm) | 1- 7 (mean 2.5) | 2-12 (mean 3.9) |
Recurrence | 4 (9%) | 1 (5%) |
Lev-Chelouche | Neary | |
Number | 29 | 19 |
Distance from dentate line (cm) | 3-15 (mean 8) | 4-14 (mean 10) |
Size (cm) | 2-5 (mean 3.2) | 1-6 (mean 3.2) |
Recurrence | 4 (18%) | 0 (0%) |
Lev-Chelouche | Neary | |
Number | 75 | 40 |
Mortality | 1 (1.3%) | 0 (0%) |
Morbidity | 10 (13%) | 8 (20%) |
Hospital stay (days) | 2-13 (mean 5.5) | 1-6 (mean 3.2) |
Table 8 Median Survival following treatment for CRC liver metastases
- Citation: Makin GB, Breen DJ, Monson JR. The impact of new technology on surgery for colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2001; 7(5): 612-621
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v7/i5/612.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v7.i5.612