Copyright
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2026; 32(6): 116028
Published online Feb 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i6.116028
Published online Feb 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i6.116028
Table 1 Key co-mutation partners in polymerase epsilon-mutant colorectal cancer and their potential clinical relevance
| Co-mutated gene | Functional category | Potential biological consequence | Potential clinical relevance |
| MLH3/MSH3 | DNA mismatch repair (accessory proteins) | Potential synergistic (“double-hit”) effect on genomic instability with POLE mutations; may further elevate tumor mutational burden[27,35] | Requires validation; may identify a subset with enhanced response to ICIs[27] |
| KRAS | Oncogenic signaling (MAPK pathway) | Constitutive activation of proliferation/survival signals[30] | Suggests resistance to anti-EGFR therapy[30]; may necessitate KRAS-targeted strategies (e.g., KRAS G12C inhibitors) |
| PIK3CA | Oncogenic signaling (PI3K/AKT pathway) | Activation of growth and metabolic pathways[31] | Potential sensitivity to PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibitors (in research settings)[31] |
| BRAF | Oncogenic signaling (MAPK pathway) | Constitutive MAPK pathway activation; often associated with specific subtypes[30,32] | BRAF V600E mutation confers poor prognosis; may guide use of BRAF/EGFR/MEK inhibitor combinations[33] |
| TP53 | Tumor suppressor | Loss of cell cycle control and apoptosis; promotes genomic instability[34] | Associated with tumor progression and worse prognosis; a common event in advanced CRC[34] |
- Citation: Xu JJ, Ni CX, Xu JJ. Emerging role of DNA polymerase epsilon non-exonuclease domain mutations in colorectal cancer: From sequence variants to clinical implications. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(6): 116028
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i6/116028.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v32.i6.116028
