BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Editorial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2026; 32(6): 116028
Published online Feb 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i6.116028
Table 1 Key co-mutation partners in polymerase epsilon-mutant colorectal cancer and their potential clinical relevance
Co-mutated gene
Functional category
Potential biological consequence
Potential clinical relevance
MLH3/MSH3DNA mismatch repair (accessory proteins)Potential synergistic (“double-hit”) effect on genomic instability with POLE mutations; may further elevate tumor mutational burden[27,35]Requires validation; may identify a subset with enhanced response to ICIs[27]
KRASOncogenic signaling (MAPK pathway)Constitutive activation of proliferation/survival signals[30]Suggests resistance to anti-EGFR therapy[30]; may necessitate KRAS-targeted strategies (e.g., KRAS G12C inhibitors)
PIK3CAOncogenic signaling (PI3K/AKT pathway)Activation of growth and metabolic pathways[31]Potential sensitivity to PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibitors (in research settings)[31]
BRAFOncogenic signaling (MAPK pathway)Constitutive MAPK pathway activation; often associated with specific subtypes[30,32]BRAF V600E mutation confers poor prognosis; may guide use of BRAF/EGFR/MEK inhibitor combinations[33]
TP53Tumor suppressorLoss of cell cycle control and apoptosis; promotes genomic instability[34]Associated with tumor progression and worse prognosis; a common event in advanced CRC[34]