BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Editorial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7, 2026; 32(5): 115439
Published online Feb 7, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i5.115439
Table 1 Main clinical results of the recent studies
Ref.
Diagnosis
Number of patients (male/female)
Number of controls (male/female)
Disease status
Direction of GDF15 change
Circulating GDF15 level (pg/mL)
Yamamoto et al[22], 2022Patients: CD with low skeletal muscle index. Controls: CD without low muscle index33 (17/16)45 (33/12)In remission (CDAI: 97.6 ± 59.5 vs 93.4 ± 53.6)1511.0 ± 1646.3 vs 688.2 ± 575.3
Ramasamy et al[20], 2023Patients: UC. Controls: Dyspepsia with no systemic inflammation80 (48/32)39 (23/16)20/80 in remission (defined by Truelove-Witts criteria)576.515 (416.51-937.91) vs 520.14 (343.99-686.28)
Tonkic et al[18], 2024Patients: IBD. Controls: Healthy volunteers90 (53/37): CD 48, UC 4267 (43/24)CD in remission [CDAI: 55 (34-84)]; UC with mild disease [Mayo score: 3 (2-5)]800 (512-1154) vs 412 (407-424)
Kučerka et al[21], 2024Patients: IBD. Controls: Individuals without any chronic inflammatory disease100 (60/40)50 (21/29)In remission (defined as the resolution of abdominal pain and the resolution of altered bowel habits)751 (400-3406) vs 527 (400-1171)
Koureta et al[19], 2025Patients: IBD. Controls: Healthy individualsCD 122 (78/44)44In remission (HBI 2.1 ± 1.8)686.5 (655) vs 556 (271)
UC 71 (46/25)44Mild [clinical Mayo score 3 (5)]807 (744) vs 556 (270)
Ruiz-Malagón et al[23], 2025Patients: IBD. Controls: Healthy volunteers from the colon cancer screening program with non-pathological findingsCD 21 (10/11)23 (12/11)Not reportedLevels of GDF15 in plasma from IBD patients were significantly increased compared to HC. When stratified, both CD and UC patients maintained significantly higher levels. Data was not reported
UC 18 (7/11)23 (12/11)Not reported