BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Observational Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2026; 32(28): 121267
Published online Jul 28, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.121267
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study participants, mean ± SD/n (%)
Characteristics
Control
Adenoma
CRC
P value
Age (years)49.68 ± 11.6750.15 ± 10.4954.93 ± 8.450.022
Female24 (20)22 (18.3)19 (15.8)0.528
Body height (cm)165.75 ± 6.93167.85 ± 7.08168.25 ± 8.920.463
Body weight (kg)64.86 ± 10.4869.05 ± 14.0872.22 ± 14.550.09
Body mass index (kg/m2)23.53 ± 3.0624.36 ± 3.7725.4 ± 4.090.099
Hypertension11 (9.2)12 (10)13 (10.8)0.888
Diabetes3 (2.5)3 (2.5)4 (3.3)0.897
Use of antithrombotic agents2 (1.7)1 (0.8)1 (0.8)0.772
Current smoking9 (7.5)8 (6.7)9 (7.5)0.952
Current drinking5 (4.2)14 (11.7)19 (15.8)0.003
Table 2 Diagnostic performance of fecal calprotectin across different disease groups
Disease group
Sensitivity (95%CI)
Specificity (95%CI)
PPV (95%CI)
NPV (95%CI)
LR+
LR-
AUC (95%CI)
Adenoma50% (33.9%-66.1%)65% (48.5%-78.8%)58.8% (41.4%-74.5%)56.5% (41.6%-70.6%)1.43 (0.85-2.41)0.77 (0.52-1.13)0.591 (0.466-0.716)
CRC77.5% (61.7%-88.6%)65% (48.5%-78.8%)68.9% (53.5%-81.2%)74.3% (57.1%-86.8%)2.21 (1.41-3.49)0.35 (0.19-0.64)0.797 (0.697-0.897)
Presence of intestinal lesions63.8% (52.2%-74.1%)65% (48.5%-78.8%)78.5% (66.8%-87.2%)47.3% (34%-61%)1.82 (1.16-2.87)0.56 (0.39-0.81)0.694 (0.6-0.787)
Table 3 Diagnostic performance of high-sensitivity quantitative fecal immunochemical test across different disease groups
Disease group
Sensitivity (95%CI)
Specificity (95%CI)
PPV (95%CI)
NPV (95%CI)
LR+
LR-
AUC (95%CI)
Adenoma37.5% (22.9%-54.3%)92.5% (79.7%-98.1%)83.3% (60.5%-95.4%)59.7% (46.6%-71.6%)5 (1.9-13.2)0.68 (0.5-0.9)0.653 (0.532-0.774)
CRC80% (64.4%-90.5%)92.5% (79.7%-98.1%)91.4% (77.2%-97.8%)82.2% (67.9%-91.5%)10.67 (3.55-32)0.22 (0.12-0.4)0.872 (0.786-0.958)
Presence of intestinal lesions58.8% (47.1%-69.7%)92.5% (79.7%-98.1%)94% (83%-98.6%)52.9% (40.6%-64.9%)7.84 (2.6-23.6)0.45 (0.34-0.59)0.762 (0.677-0.848)
Table 4 Diagnostic performance of the combined test across different disease groups
Disease group
Sensitivity (95%CI)
Specificity (95%CI)
PPV (95%CI)
NPV (95%CI)
LR+
LR-
AUC (95%CI)
Adenoma65% (48.5%-78.8%)60% (43.5%-75%)61.9% (46.2%-76%)63.2% (46.6%-77.8%)1.63 (1.04-2.53)0.58 (0.36-0.95)0.662 (0.543-0.782)
CRC87.5% (73%-95.8%)60% (43.5%-75%)68.6% (54.9%-80.2%)82.8% (64.7%-93.2%)2.19 (1.47-3.26)0.21 (0.09-0.49)0.866 (0.784-0.949)
Presence of intestinal lesions76.3% (65.5%-84.7%)60% (43.5%-75%)79.2% (68.5%-87.2%)55.8% (40.6%-70.2%)1.91 (1.28-2.84)0.4 (0.25-0.63)0.764 (0.68-0.848)
Table 5 Characteristics of 5 colorectal cancer cases with false-negative stool test results
No.
Size (cm)
Stage
Location
Histology
Presenting symptoms
FC value
Hs-qFIT value
Fresh or frozen
Whether anemia
11 × 0.4 × 0.2TisN0M0SigmoidModerately to well-differentiated adenocarcinomaNo symptoms< 30< 10FreshNo
21.5 × 1.0TisN0M0IleocecumModerately to well-differentiated adenocarcinomaDifficulty in defecation< 30< 10FreshNo
32.3 × 1.8 × 1T2N1M0SigmoidUlcerative moderately differentiated adenocarcinomaNo symptoms< 30< 10FreshNo
42.2 × 2 × 1T4N2M1RectumProtruded moderately to poorly differentiated adenocarcinomaNo symptoms< 30< 10FrozenNo
51.5T1N0M0RectosigmoidModerately to well-differentiated adenocarcinomaAbdominal pain< 30< 10FreshNo


Write to the Help Desk