BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2026; 32(2): 113810
Published online Jan 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i2.113810
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the patient cohort (n = 362) used for analysis of secondary outcomes and the nodules cohort (n = 436) used to assess local tumor progression, n (%)
CharacteristicsPatients (n = 362)
Nodules (n = 436)
MWA (n = 120)
Mbp-RFA (n = 242)
P value
MWA (n = 147)
Mbp-RFA (n = 289)
P value
Age in years (IQR)65.52 (59.1-71.7)66.33 (59.3-72.2)P = 0.81
Male97 (80.8)211 (87.2)P = 0.11
Cirrhosis117 (97.5)226 (93.4)P = 0.1
Cirrhosis aetiologies
Viral hepatitis19 (15.8)44 (18.2)P = 0.91
NASH23 (19.2)44 (18.2)
Alcoholic41 (34.2)74 (30.6)
Other/mixed20 (16.7)39 (16.1)
Child Pugh
Child Pugh A99 (82.5)211 (87.2)P = 0.23
Child Pugh B21 (17.5)31 (12.8)
Platelet count
< 100 G/L47 (39.2)82 (33.9)P = 0.32
≥ 100 G/L73 (60.8)160 (66.1)
AFP
< 10 ng/mL86 (71.7)159 (65.7)P = 0.39
10-100 ng/mL27 (22.5)60 (24.8)
> 100 ng/mL7 (5.8)23 (9.5)
Number of nodules treated per patient1.411.34P = 0.16
Histological proof41 (34.2)198 (81.8)P < 0.005
Size
< 20mm69 (46.9)93 (32.2)P < 0.001
20-30 mm55 (37.4)108 (37.4)
≥ 30 mm23 (15.6)88 (30.4)
Tumour near large vessel20 (13.6)36 (12.5)P = 0.735
Subcapsular tumour74 (50.3)167 (57.8)P = 0.139
Proximity to the gallbladder4 (2.7)18 (6.2)P = 0.114
Segmental portal thrombosis03 (1)P = 0.554
Operator experience (months)107 (38-360)303 (105-331)P = 0.026
Guidance modality
By ultrasound alone49 (33.3)288 (99.7)P < 0.001
By scanner alone7 (4.8)1 (0.3)
Mixed guidance (ultrasound + scanner)91 (61.9)0
Nodules treated per centerP < 0.001
Institution A35 (23.8)289 (100)
Institution B112 (76.2)0 (0)
Table 2 Residual tumor and local recurrence rates as a function of lesion size and treatment group, n (%)

Residual tumor (n = 491 nodules)
Local tumor progression (n = 436 nodules)
TotalMWA (n = 168)21 (12.5)MWA (n = 147)37 (25.2)
Mbp-RFA (n = 323)19 (5.9)Mbp-RFA (n = 289)33 (11.4)
P value0.01P value0.002
< 30 mmMWA (n = 141)17 (12.1)MWA (n = 124)23 (18.5)
Mbp-RFA (n = 227)15 (6.6)Mbp-RFA (n = 201)17 (7)
P value0.071P value< 0.002
≥ 30 mmMWA (n = 27)4 (14.8)MWA (n = 23)14 (60.9)
Mbp-RFA (n = 96)4 (4.2)Mbp-RFA (n = 88)19 (21.6)
P value0.069P value0.04
Table 3 Predictive factors of local recurrence (n = 436 nodules)
Univariable analysis
Multivariable analysis
Multivariable analysis (competing risks)
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
Age (years)1.03 (1.002-1.06)0.0371.02 (0.99-1.05)0.1921.02 (0.98-1.06)0.15
Sex (male vs female)0.62 (0.31-1.25)0.182----
Child Pugh (B vs A)1.85 (0.94-3.65)0.0741.55 (0.75-3.2)0.2330.72 (0.27-1.95)0.52
Platelet count (for 50.000 additional platelet)1.09 (0.90-1.33)0.376----
AFP (for 100 ng/mL additional)1.10 (1.08-1.13)< 0.0011.05 (0.99-1.11)0.0801 (0.94-1.01)0.48
Tumor size (mm)1.08 (1.06-1.11)< 0.0011.08 (1.05-1.11)< 0.0011.07 (1.05-1.1) 0.06
Subcapsular HCC0.97 (0.60-1.57)0.900----
Proximity of HCC to large vessels1.29 (0.68-2.42)0.4351.34 (0.69-2.59)0.3931.14 (0.59-2.2)0.7
Number of HCC nodules0.88 (0.71-1.08)0.224----
Treatment by ultrasound guidance alone0.40 (0.10-1.59)0.193----
Treatment by ultrasound and CT guidance0.92 (0.22-3.79)0.908----
Operator experience (per additional month)1.00 (0.998-1.002)0.9631.00 (0.999-1.002)0.7021.00 (0.999-1)0.9
Thermoablation technique (MWA vs mbp-RFA)2.41 (1.48-3.90)< 0.0012.85 (1.69-4.81)< 0.0012.35 (1.3-4.3)0.005
Table 4 Major complications according to the society of interventional radiology classification (n = 362 patients)
Society of interventional radiology classificationTreatment group
MWA, n = 9 (7.5%)
Mbp-RFA, n = 23 (9.5%)
Grade C4 (3.3%): 2 patients with portal thrombus requiring anticoagulation; 2 patients with symptomatic undrained pleural effusion9 (3.7%): 3 patients with portal thrombus requiring anticoagulation; 2 patients with symptomatic undrained pleural effusion; 1 patient with ascitic decompensation treated with diuretics; 2 patients with pneumopathy treated with antibiotics; 1 patient with soft tissue hematoma with pain
Grade D4 (3.3%): 2 patients with symptomatic pleural effusion with indication for pleural drainage; 1 patient with cessation of the procedure after treatment of the first nodule for dyspnea, transfer to intensive care; 1 patient with drained pneumothorax13 (5.4%): 8 patients with symptomatic pleural effusion with indication for pleural drainage; 2 patients with reactive cholecystitis (1 operated, 1 medically treated); 1 patient with an arterio-portal fistula requiring remote embolization; 2 patients with an infection of the surgical site (one with pre-hepatic collection, on with intra-hepatic collection in contact with the scar)
Grade E1 (0.8%): 1 patient with necrosis of the left lobe with stay in intensive care1 (0.4%): 1 biliopleural fistula requiring drainage and thoracoscopy
Grade F00