Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 28, 2026; 32(12): 113939
Published online Mar 28, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i12.113939
Published online Mar 28, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i12.113939
Table 1 Comparison of clinical parameters in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis patients, n (%)
| MASL (n = 78) | MASH (n = 112) | P value | |
| Sex (male) | 48 (61.54) | 57 (50.89) | 0.147 |
| Age (year) | 45.54 ± 12.93 | 43.77 ± 15.34 | 0.391 |
| BMI (kg/m2, median) | 23.31 (22.2, 25.9) | 25.75 (23.9, 27.9) | 0.000 |
| Hypertension | 16 (20.51) | 34 (30.36) | 0.130 |
| Diabetes | 5 (6.14) | 24 (21.43) | 0.005 |
| Metabolic syndrome | 17 (21.52) | 43 (38.74) | 0.011 |
| ALT (U/L, median) | 49.60 (29.6, 87.1) | 98.60 (69.2, 163.1) | 0.000 |
| AST (U/L, median) | 28.750 (20.5, 40.1) | 56.550 (39.8, 81.0) | 0.000 |
| GGT (U/L, median) | 86.950 (28.9, 207.1) | 80.75 (45.2, 127.0) | 0.520 |
| ALP (U/L, median) | 91.70 (73.0, 117.0) | 86.30 (71.6, 105.0) | 0.261 |
| ALB | 43.90 (41.5, 47.1) | 45.050 (42.5, 47.0) | 0.341 |
| TBIL | 13.450 (9.6, 18.3) | 13.300 (9.6, 17.1) | 0.610 |
| BUN | 4.700 (4.1, 5.8) | 4.460 (3.8, 5.5) | 0.143 |
| Cr | 68.0 (58.0, 81.5) | 65.50 (52.8, 77.0) | 0.132 |
| UA | 348.0 (272.8, 402.0) | 364.50 (299.5, 449.0) | 0.028 |
| TG | 1.710 (1.1, 2.3) | 1.570 (1.3, 2.2) | 0.823 |
| TC | 4.50 (3.9, 5.2) | 4.760 (4.3, 5.5) | 0.078 |
| LDL | 2.89 ± 0.78 | 3.10 ± 0.82 | 0.092 |
| HDL | 1.11 ± 0.26 | 1.09 ± 0.21 | 0.602 |
| GLU | 5.240 (4.7, 5.6) | 5.425 (4.9, 6.1) | 0.011 |
| M30 | 153.0 (153.0, 228.6) | 476.0 (391.1, 549.0) | 0.000 |
| M65 | 168.0 (153.3, 282.0) | 579.0 (537.1, 621.3) | 0.000 |
| CAP | 250.0 (228.5, 261.0) | 291.0 (276.5, 313.0) | 0.000 |
| LSM | 5.050 (4.1, 6.7) | 7.40 (4.7, 10.2) | 0.003 |
| NFS | 2.283 (1.8, 2.6) | 2.626 (2.0, 3.2) | 0.006 |
Table 2 Comparison of pathological parameters in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis patients, n (%)
| MASL (n = 78) | MASH (n = 112) | P value | |
| Steatosis | 0.000 | ||
| Score 1 | 71 (91.03) | 21 (18.75) | |
| Score 2 | 6 (7.69) | 50 (44.64) | |
| Score 3 | 1 (1.28) | 41 (36.61) | |
| Ballooned hepatocytes with H&E staining and SHH + CK8/18 immunostaining | 0.000 | ||
| Score 0 | 37 (47.44) | 0 | |
| Score 1 | 41 (52.56) | 49 (43.75) | |
| Score 2 | 0 | 63 (56.25) | |
| Lobular inflammation | 0.000 | ||
| Score 0 | 2 (2.56) | 0 | |
| Score 1 | 56 (71.79) | 4 (3.57) | |
| Score 2 | 19 (24.36) | 48 (42.86) | |
| Score 3 | 1 (1.28) | 60 (53.57) | |
| Fibrosis | 0.000 | ||
| Score 0 | 39 (50.0) | 11 (9.82) | |
| Score 1 | 30 (38.46) | 31 (27.68) | |
| Score 2 | 8 (10.26) | 32 (28.57) | |
| Score 3 | 1 (1.28) | 30 (26.79) | |
| Score 4 | 0 | 8 (7.14) |
Table 3 Binary logistic regression analysis of risk factors associated with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis
| B | SE | Wald | df | Sig | Exp(B) | 95%CI for Exp(B) | |
| Diabetes | 3.042 | 1.504 | 4.094 | 1 | 0.043 | 20.95 | 1.100-399.132 |
| AST | 0.043 | 0.019 | 5.176 | 1 | 0.023 | 1.044 | 1.006-1.083 |
| CAP | 0.033 | 0.013 | 6.991 | 1 | 0.008 | 1.034 | 1.009-1.059 |
| SHH | 1.967 | 0.822 | 5.722 | 1 | 0.017 | 7.151 | 1.427-35.848 |
| Constant | -13.551 | 3.737 | 13.149 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.001 | - |
Table 4 Binary logistic regression analysis of risk factors associated with advanced fibrosis
| B | SE | Wald | df | Sig | Exp(B) | 95%CI for Exp(B) | |
| Ballooned hepatocytes | 1.863 | 0.820 | 5.161 | 1 | 0.023 | 6.440 | 1.291-32.114 |
| M30 | 0.012 | 0.004 | 7.871 | 1 | 0.005 | 1.012 | 1.004-1.021 |
| Constant | 2.657 | 3.721 | 0.510 | 1 | 0.000 | 14.247 | - |
- Citation: Han X, Chen MY, Xiong QF, Zhong YD, Liu DX, Li J, Yang YF. Role of hepatic sonic hedgehog protein expression in the diagnosis of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(12): 113939
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i12/113939.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v32.i12.113939
