BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 14, 2026; 32(10): 116152
Published online Mar 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i10.116152
Table 1 Baseline demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of patients with benign biliary anastomotic stricture, n (%)
Characteristics
Value
Age (years), median (range)53 (25-72)
Sex
Male16 (40.0)
Female24 (60.0)
Clinical presentation
Repeated cholangitis36 (90.0)
Obstructive jaundice4 (10.0)
Underlying causes of Roux-en-Y bilioenterostomy
LC with intraoperative bile duct injury14 (35.0)
Choledochal cyst8 (20.0)
Hepatolithiasis7 (17.5)
Pancreatic cystic or solid tumor5 (12.5)
Ampulloma of the papilla of Vater2 (5.0)
Others14 (10.0)
Time interval from bilioenteric anastomosis to BBAS treatment (months), median (range)66 (2-254)
Abnormal liver function test results (n = 40)
γ-glutamyl transferase (IU/L) (upper normal limit 50 IU/L)38 (95.0)
Alkaline phosphatase (IU/L) (upper normal limit 112 IU/L)34 (85.0)
Total bilirubin (mmol/L) (upper normal limit 17.1 mmol/L)19 (47.5)
Tumor marker level increased (n = 36)
CA19-9 (U/L) (normal limit 37 U/L)14 (38.9)
CEA (ng/mL) (upper normal limit 5 ng/mL)2 (5.6)
Table 2 Characteristics of benign biliary anastomotic stricture in 40 patients after Roux-en-Y bilioenterostomy, n (%)
Characteristics
n (%)
Location of BBAS1
Common bile duct4 (10.0)
Common hepatic duct19 (47.5)
Hilar bifurcation15 (37.5)
RHD and LHD2 (5.0)
Severity of BBAS
Mild10 (25.0)
Moderate11 (27.5)
Severe219 (47.5)
Length of BBAS (mm)
≤ 520 (76.9)
6-96 (23.1)
≥ 100 (0.0)
Complexity of BBAS
Simple32 (80.0)
Complex38 (20.0)
Strictures opposite of PTBD4 (10.0)
Table 3 Outcomes of percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy-assisted procedures in patients with a benign biliary anastomotic stricture, n (%)
Outcomes
Value
Primary outcomes
Anastomotic patency rate
Initial patency rate after stricture dilation (n = 31)
1 year (3-11 months)18 (58.1)
2 years (3-21 months)13 (41.9)
Cumulative patency rate after catheter removal (n = 29)
1 year (%)(74.3)
2 years (%)(69.7)
3 years (%)(59.7)
5 years (%)(49.8)
7 years (%)(34.8)
8 years (%)(21.8)
9 years (%)(14.5)
Treatment success (n = 32)29 (90.6)
Secondary outcomes
Technical success for PTCS-assisted stricture dilation (n = 31)31 (100.0)
Simple stricture for mean 1.2 BD sessions (n = 19)19 (100.0)
Complex stricture for mean 1.4 BD sessions (n = 8)8 (100.0)
Simple strictures for bougie dilation (n = 4)4 (100.0)
Initial technical success without a prior recanalization technique (n = 32)24 (75.0)
Technical success of PTCS-assisted recanalization (n = 8)7 (87.5)
With guidewire (n = 4)4 (100.0)
With microcatheter system (n = 2)2 (100.0)
With needle knife (n = 2)1 (50.0)
Overall technical success with or without a recanalization technique (n = 32)31 (96.9)
Technical success of PTCS-assisted lithotripsy/stone removal (n = 36)34 (94.4)
Stones recurred (n = 28)3 (10.7)
Successful removal of indwelling PTCS catheter (n = 32)291 (90.6)
Duration of indwelling PTCS catheter, median months (range), (n = 29)6 (2-109)
Table 4 Adverse events during percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage, sinus tract dilation as well as percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy-assisted procedures, n (%)

PTBD (n = 40)
Percutaneous sinus tract dilation (n = 40)
PTCS-assisted anastomotic stricture dilation (n = 31)1
PTCS-assisted anastomotic recanalization (n = 8)
PTCS-assisted stone therapy (n = 36)2
Cholangitis5 (12.5)2 (5.0)2 (6.5)0 (0.0)2 (5.6)
Bacteremia4 (10.0)2 (5.0)1 (3.3)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Right pleural effusion2 (5.0)1 (2.5)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Hemobilia0 (0.0)1 (2.5)31 (3.3)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Catheter migration0 (0.0)1 (2.5)40 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (2.8)4
Overall11 (27.5)7 (17.5)4 (12.9)0 (0.0)3 (8.3)