BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Editorial
©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 14, 2026; 32(10): 115371
Published online Mar 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i10.115371
Table 1 Growth differentiation factor 11-mediated key immunometabolic mechanisms on M2-like macrophages
Feature/mechanism
M2-like macrophage state (baseline)
GDF11 treatment effect
Proposed anti-tumoral impact
Molecular markers/processes
PhenotypePro-tumoral, immune-suppressiveReversal/de-polarizationLoss of pro-tumoral function and recognitionCD206 (decrease); anti-tumoral phenotype (increase)
SignalingVaried/dependent on TMEActivation of canonical pathwayTransduction of immunometabolic shift signalSmad2/3 activation
Mitochondria/energyLow OXPHOS, high glycolysisRestoration of OXPHOSEnhanced energy metabolism for microbicidal functionOxygen consumption rate (increase)
Lipid metabolismHigh cholesterol/lipid accumulationReduction of lipid contentInterference with M2 maintenance and signalingTotal cellular cholesterol (decrease)
Redox stateLow microbicidal ROSIncrease in ROSInduction of cytotoxic/inflammatory stateReactive oxygen species (increase)
Table 2 Growth differentiation factor 11-induced secretome shift in M2-like macrophages
Cytokine/factor family
Mediator
Baseline M2 secretion
GDF11 treatment effect
Functional consequence on tumor cells
Pro-tumoral/angiogenicIL-6HighSignificantly (decrease)Reduced proliferation, survival, and metastasis
Pro-tumoral/angiogenicENA-78 (CXCL5)Moderate/highSignificantly (decrease)Reduced cell migration and invasiveness
Pro-tumoral/angiogenicAngiogeninModerate/highSignificantly (decrease)Inhibition of tumor vascularization
Pro-inflammatory/anti-tumoralIL-1betaLowSignificantly (increase)Induction of anti-tumoral inflammatory signaling
Pro-inflammatory/anti-tumoralTNF-αLowSignificantly (increase)Direct cytotoxic effect on tumor cells
Chemotactic/immune recruitmentMCP-1, MCP-2, MCP-3, regulated upon activation normal T cell expressed and secretedVariableSignificantly (increase)Recruitment of anti-tumoral immune cells (such as T-cells)
Table 3 Future therapeutic applications and research directions for growth differentiation factor 11 in oncology
Application focus
Suggested approach
Rationale
Research priority
Pan-cancer therapyGDF11 agonists/mimeticsDirectly drive TAM reprogramming and enhance anti-tumor immunity without systemic cytotoxicity in multiple TMEsIn vivo safety and efficacy in models of various solid tumors (including breast, lung, colorectal)
Combination therapyGDF11 + immunotherapyCombine GDF11-mediated M2-reversal with checkpoint blockade (PD-1/PD-L1) to overcome TAM-driven immune exclusion/suppressionEvaluate synergistic effects in clinically resistant or “cold” tumors
Metabolic diseaseGDF11 for NASH/fibrosisReverse M2-like phenotype in chronic inflammation that predisposes tissues to malignancy (including liver fibrosis, HCC)Efficacy in chronic inflammatory liver disease models (such as diet-induced NASH)
Molecular targetingMetabolic checkpoint inhibitionIdentify and target the specific metabolic enzymes (in cholesterol or OXPHOS pathways) regulated by GDF11 for targeted drug developmentDetailed multi-omics analysis (metabolomics, transcriptomics) of GDF11-treated TAMs