BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21, 2025; 31(43): 112076
Published online Nov 21, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i43.112076
Table 1 Summary of study design, participant demographics, and methodological quality (Newcastle-Ottawa scale score) for the 17 studies
Ref.
Study design
Subjects (male/female)
Mean age (years)
Etiology (%)
MELD
Methods for the diagnosis of sarcopenia
Sarcopenia definition/cutoff
Imaging assessment time frame
NOS quality assessment
Woodward et al[22], 2021Prospective42 (36:6)5662 chronic hepatitis C; 12 ALD; 7 PSC; 19 others14 ± 5BIS, Tengvall; US, mid-forearm, mid-upper arm anteriorly, and mid-tight on the dominant side; CT, L3 SMI; DEXA, SMIMale ≤ 8.50 kg/m2, female ≤ 5.75 kg/m2; male < 48.9 cm2/m2, female < 36.3 cm2/m2; male < 7.26 kg/m2, female < 5.45 kg/m2Before LT5
Molwitz et al[23], 2023Retrospective152 (109:43)55 ± 1035 ALD; 22 viral; 13 AIH; 6 NASH; 7 re-transplantation; 6 ALF; 12 cryptogenic or other20 (12-30)CT, L3 SMI, and muscle densityMale < 50 cm2/m2, female < 39 cm2/m2; mean MRA grouped patients, as BMI-based cutoffs may be biased by edema and ascitesPre-LT, a short-term (11 months) and long-term (56 months) post-transplant follow-up7
Forsgren et al[24], 2024Prospective18 (13:5)58 ± 9.439 HCV; 33 ALD; 22 NASH; 6 HIV15.3 ± 5.0MRI, neck-to-knee, FFMV Z-score (AMRA®) and MFIFFMV Z-score < 25th percentile and MFI > 75th percentileLT waitlist7
Carey et al[25], 2017Retrospective396 (277:119)58 (51, 62)48 HCV; 17 ALD; 12 NASH; 10 AIH/PBC/PSC; 5 HBV; 7 others15.2 (11.0-20.6)CT, superior aspect of L3, SMIMale 50 cm2/m2, female 39 cm2/m2Within 3 months post-listing6
Quinlan et al[26], 2023Prospective57 (35:22)5548.7 ALD; 23 PSC; 10.2 PBC; 12.8 NASH; 5.2 Other11.0 (5)US, VL thickness, and quadriceps ACSA;
MRI, L3, SMI, ACSA, mid-ACSA, PCSA, IMAT
LT waitlist6
Golse et al[27], 2017Retrospective256 (196:60)53 ± 10.545 ALD; 35 HCV; 7 HBV; 2 NASH; 2 AIH; 6 biliary; 2 others19.3 ± 10.2CT, L3/L4, PMAMale < 1561 mm2, female < 1464 mm24 months before LT7
Bot et al[28], 2023Retrospective169 (125:44)54 ± 1033.7 ALD; 14.2 cholestatic disease; 20.1 viral hepatitis; 11.8 HCC; 4.1 AIH; 16.0 others13 ± 6CT, L3, SMA, SMI, and MALT waitlist7
Sinclair et al[29], 2019Retrospective420 (420:0)55.4 (49.2, 59.4)28.3 HCC; 24.3 HCV; 12.6 ALD; 10.2 PSC; 6.2 NAFLD; 18.3 others16 (12-19)DEXA, ALMI (ALM adjusted by height)< 7.26 kg/m2LT waitlist7
Kappus et al[30], 2020Retrospective355 (232:123)53.7 (12.0)29 HCV; 3.3 HBV; 29.9 NASH/cryptogenic; 17.7 ALD; 5.1 AIH; 3.9 PBC; 8.7 PSC; 11.8 others19.4 (8.3)CT, L3, SMIMale 50 cm2/m2, female 39 cm2/m2LT waitlist7
Lee et al[31], 2021Retrospective72 (52:20)53.2 ± 8.772 HBV; 13 HCV; 1 HBV + HCV; 3 ALD; 11 others21.1 ± 9.0CT, L3, ΔSMIPreoperative ΔSMI: ≤ -30% large decrease in skeletal muscle; > -30% small decrease or increase in SMI1 year pre-LT, pre-LT (within 2 months), and post-LT7
Kyselova et al[32], 2025Prospective134 (74:60)59.6 (49.2, 65.3)14 (11-17)CT, L3, SMI; 31P MRS, gastrocnemius and soleus, βATP/Ptot, and intramyocellular pHMale 50 cm2/m2, female 39cm2/m2; βATP/Ptot < 0.74; intramyocellular pH > 7.045Pre- and post-LT (6, 12, and 24 months)7
Chae et al[33], 2018Retrospective408 (286:122)52.0 ± 9.057.6 HBV; 20.1 ALD; 7.6 HCV; 6.4 toxins and drugs; 3.2 AIH; 0.7 HAV; 4.4 cryptogenic16 ± 1CT, L3/L4, PMIPMI change before LT to POD 7 cutoff ≤ 25th quartile/ < 11.7%1 month before LT7
Ebadi et al[34], 2018Retrospective353 (246:107)56 ± 9ESLD16 ± 8CT, L3, SMI and PMISMI: Male 50 cm2/m2, female 39 cm2/m2; PMI: Male 51cm2/m2, female 43 cm2/m23 months of listing7
Alconchel et al[35], 2020Retrospective57 (49:8)57 (35, 73)35 HCC; 21 ALD; 26 HCV; 9 ALF (urgent); 6 other cirrhosis; 3 HBVNACT, L3, PMI1 month before LT5
Hey et al[36], 2022Retrospective469 (338:131)55.0 (47.4, 59.7)29 viral hepatitis; 11 ALD16 (12-20)DEXA, APLMMale < 7.26 kg/m2, female < 5.5 kg/m2LT waitlist8
van Vugt et al[37], 2018Retrospective224 (149:75)56 (48, 62)12.5 ALD; 3.1 HBV; 7.1 HCV; 29 PSC/PBC; 33.5 HCC; 0.5 cholangiocarcinoma; 3.1 NASH; 4 cryptogenic; 2.2 AIH; 5 others16 (11-20)CT, L3, SMILowest sex-specific quartile3 months from listing9
Kuo et al[38], 2019Retrospective126 (80:46)53 (46-59)31 HCV; 25 ALD; 7 NASH/NAFLD; 13 AIH/PBC/PSC; 10 HBV; 15 others32 (25-37)CT, L3, SMIMale < 48 cm2/m2Pre-LT7
Table 2 Association between sarcopenia and waitlist mortality in end-stage liver disease: Summary of prevalence rates, effect measures, and outcomes from studies evaluating the impact of sarcopenia on waitlist mortality among patients with end-stage liver disease
Ref.
Prevalence of sarcopenia
Association with waitlist mortality
Effect measure
Result
Carey et al[25], 201745%, 42% male and 54% femaleSignificantHRHR per 1 cm2/m2 increase = 0.95 (95%CI: 0.92-0.98), P < 0.001, meaning a 5% risk reduction per unit increase in SMI; lower SMI indicates higher mortality risk
Sinclair et al[29], 201930, 9%Significant HRHR per 1 kg/m2 increase in ALMI = 0.78 (95%CI: 0.62-0.98), P = 0.03. Indicates a 22% reduction in waitlist mortality risk with each unit increase in ALMI; sarcopenia is associated with increased risk
Kappus et al[30], 202017, 2%Not significantHRHR = 0.98 (95%CI: 0.95-1.02), P = 0.41. No significant association between sarcopenia and waitlist mortality
Ebadi et al[34], 201822% (PMI-defined); 51% male/36% female (SMI)Female: Both low SMI and PMI significant; male: Low SMI significant and PMI not significantHRSarcopenia defined by SMI was significantly associated with increased waitlist mortality in both male (HR = 2.46, 95%CI: 1.38-4.39; P = 0.002) and female (HR = 2.05, 95%CI: 1.00-4.21; P = 0.05). Sarcopenia defined by PMI was significantly associated with mortality in females (HR = 2.47; 95%CI: 1.24-4.95; P = 0.01), but not in males (HR = 0.85; P = 0.09)
Alconchel et al[35], 2020Not reportedNot significantNot reported/no significant associationPMI was not representative of sarcopenia and failed to predict waitlist mortality
Table 3 Association between sarcopenia and post-transplant survival in end-stage liver disease: Summary of sarcopenia prevalence, statistical associations, and survival outcomes reported in studies assessing post-liver transplantation prognosis in end-stage liver disease patients
Ref.
Prevalence of sarcopenia
Association with post-LT survival
Effect measure
Result
Molwitz et al[23], 2023Pre-LT: 61%. Post-LT prevalence not reported in %Significant (only myosteatosis, not muscle mass)HR = 0.945 (95%CI: 0.903-0.990), P = 0.016Myosteatosis predicted worse survival: 3 months (72% vs 95%), 1 year (63% vs 90%), 5 years (54% vs 84%), P = 0.001. SMI decreased post-LT but was not associated with survival
Golse et al[27], 201722%SignificantSurvival probabilities (Kaplan-Meier)Sarcopenia, defined by psoas muscle area (cutoffs: < 1561 mm2 for male, < 1464 mm2 for female), was associated with lower post-LT survival, 1-year survival 59% vs 94%, and 5-year survival 54% vs 80% (log-rank P < 0.001)
Lee et al[31], 20211 year pre-LT: 77.8%. Pre-LT: 98.6%. Post-LT: 100%SignificantHRA large preoperative decrease in SMI (ΔSMI ≤ -30%) was significantly associated with reduced post-LT survival, HR = 0.284 (95%CI: 0.102-0.789), P = 0.016
Kyselova et al[32], 202544.7% in LT candidates; 47.6% in transplanted patientsSarcopenia not significant; abnormal 31P MRS and myosteatosis linked to worse survivalHRAbnormal 31P MRS (HR = 3.40; 95%CI: 1.50-7.71, P = 0.003) and myosteatosis (HR = 2.78; 95%CI: 1.14-6.78, P = 0.025) predicted poor long-term survival and perioperative complications better than sarcopenia
Chae et al[33], 201825% with high muscle loss (≤ 11.7%)SignificantHRHigh psoas muscle loss was independently associated with worse overall survival after liver transplantation: HR 1.87 (95%CI 1.07-3.25), P = 0.03
Kuo et al[38], 2019Male 46%SignificantHRMale with sarcopenia had significantly higher post-LT mortality at 1 and 3 years. Sarcopenia was independently associated with increased risk of mortality after adjustment for MELD and liver disease etiology (univariable HR = 3.65, 95%CI 1.29-10.28, P = 0.01; multivariable HR = 4.39, P = 0.007)
Table 4 Association between sarcopenia and intensive care unit/hospital length of stay in end-stage liver disease: Summary of effect measures and findings from studies assessing the relationship between sarcopenia and the duration of intensive care unit and hospital stays in liver transplant candidates
Ref.
Prevalence of sarcopenia
Association with length of ICU and hospital stays
Effect measure
Result
Bot et al[28], 2023SMI: Significant with hospital stay; not significant with ICU stay. MA: Not significantORLength of ICU stay > 3 days was not significantly associated with SMI (OR = 1.44; 95%CI: 0.48-4.36; P = 0.518) or MA (OR = 0.45; 95%CI: 0.15-1.27; P = 0.155). Total hospital stays > 3 weeks was significantly associated with higher SMI (OR = 0.21; 95%CI: 0.06-0.73; P = 0.014), but not with MA (OR = 0.41; 95%CI: 0.13-1.27; P = 0.122)
Hey et al[36], 2022Male 28%, female 15%Upper limb lean mass: Significant (male), not significant (female); sarcopenia (APLM cutoffs): Not significantτbUpper limb lean mass was inversely associated with ICU stay (τb = -0.090, P = 0.015) and hospital stay (τb = -0.10, P = 0.0078). Sarcopenia based on gender-specific cutoffs showed no significant association with length of ICU or hospital stays