Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2025; 31(41): 111022
Published online Nov 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i41.111022
Published online Nov 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i41.111022
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the included patients, n (%)/median (interquartile range)/mean ± SD
| Variable | DBE (n = 247) | SBE (n = 247) | P value |
| Age, years | 66.0 ± 15.4 | 68.4 ± 11.6 | 0.051 |
| Sex | 0.406 | ||
| Male | 146 (59.1) | 156 (63.2) | |
| Female | 101 (40.9) | 91 (36.8) | |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 21.6 ± 2.8 | 21.6 ± 3.3 | 0.919 |
| Smoking | 40 (16.2) | 34 (13.8) | 0.528 |
| Alcohol intake | 27 (10.9) | 33 (13.4) | 0.491 |
| Amounts of alcohol (bottle/week) | 4.3 ± 5.0 | 2.3 ± 2.1 | 0.064 |
| Presence of acute cholangitis on admission | 104 (42.1) | 92 (37.2) | 0.312 |
| PTBD prior ERCP | 2 (0.8) | 31 (12.6) | < 0.001 |
| PTGBD prior ERCP | 12 (4.9) | 14 (5.7) | 0.840 |
| Initial laboratory findings | |||
| WBC, /μL | 6900.0 (5300.0-9500.0) | 5950.0 (4630.0-8345.0) | 0.003 |
| Hb, g/dL | 11.8 (10.3-13.1) | 11.4 (10.1-12.6) | 0.140 |
| Platelet, /μL | 209.0 (164.0-272.0) | 198.0 (157.0-248.5) | 0.072 |
| AST, IU/L | 33.0 (24.0-81.0) | 42.0 (25.0-92.0) | 0.157 |
| ALT, IU/L | 30.0 (17.0-59.0) | 36.0 (18.0-81.0) | 0.151 |
| Total bilirubin, mg/dL | 0.8 (0.6-1.8) | 0.8 (0.4-2.2) | 0.411 |
| Amylase, IU/L | 61.0 (41.0-84.0) | 65.0 (45.0-91.0) | 0.325 |
| Lipase, U/L | 30.0 (16.0-60) | 27.0 (18.0-50.0) | 0.970 |
| CRP, mg/L | 2.0 (0.1-9.1) | 1.2 (0.1-5.8) | 0.011 |
| Final diagnosis | < 0.001 | ||
| Malignant biliary obstruction | 53 (21.5) | 33 (13.4) | |
| Benign biliary obstruction | 73 (29.6) | 42 (17.0) | |
| Bile duct stones | 94 (38.1) | 156 (63.2) | |
| Pancreatic duct stones | 3 (1.2) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Pancreatic duct stricture | 8 (3.2) | 5 (2.0) | |
| Others | 16 (6.5) | 11 (4.5) | |
| Reason of primary surgery | < 0.001 | ||
| AOV cancer | 21 (8.5) | 7 (2.8) | |
| Cholangiocarcinoma (or suspected) | 36 (14.6) | 33 (13.4) | |
| Duodenal cancer | 2 (0.8) | 3 (1.2) | |
| Gastric cancer | 107 (43.3) | 164 (66.4) | |
| GB cancer | 5 (2.0) | 10 (4.0) | |
| Pancreatic cancer (or suspected) | 42 (17.0) | 3 (1.2) | |
| Other tumors | 0 (0.0) | 2 (0.8) | |
| Bile duct or IHD stones | 5 (2.0) | 3 (1.2) | |
| Biliary atresia | 6 (2.4) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Choledochal cyst | 5 (2.0) | 5 (2.0) | |
| PUD complication | 12 (4.9) | 9 (3.6) | |
| Trauma or surgical injury | 6 (2.4) | 8 (3.2) | |
| Type of primary surgery | < 0.001 | ||
| PD with B-II | 10 (4.0) | 28 (11.3) | |
| PD with B-II and Braun anastomosis | 2 (0.8) | 5 (2.0) | |
| PD with R-Y | 77 (31.2) | 1 (0.4) | |
| STG with B-II | 49 (19.8) | 42 (17.0) | |
| STG with B-II and Braun anastomosis | 7 (2.8) | 37 (15.0) | |
| STG with R-Y | 40 (16.2) | 30 (12.1) | |
| TG with R-Y | 23 (9.3) | 69 (27.9) | |
| BDR with R-Y | 39 (15.8) | 35 (14.2) |
Table 2 Endoscopic findings between double-balloon enteroscopy and single-balloon enteroscopy group, n (%)/mean ± SD
| Variable | DBE (n = 247) | SBE (n = 247) | P value |
| Type of JJstomy | 0.002 | ||
| None | 59 (23.9) | 70 (28.3) | |
| End to side | 48 (19.4) | 75 (30.4) | |
| Side to side | 140 (56.7) | 102 (41.3) | |
| Preserved gastric anatomy | 124 (50.2) | 69 (27.9) | < 0.001 |
| Used scope | < 0.001 | ||
| Long DBE | 15 (6.1) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Short DBE | 222 (89.9) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Short DBE ≥ long DBE | 2 (0.8) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Long DBE ≥ short DBE | 8 (3.2) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Short SBE | 0 (0.0) | 230 (93.1) | |
| Short SBE ≥ long SBE | 0 (0.0) | 3 (1.2) | |
| Long SBE ≥ short SBE | 0 (0.0) | 14 (5.7) | |
| Periampullary diverticulum | 16 (6.5) | 21 (8.5) | 0.494 |
| Time for intubation to JJ, minutes | 6.4 ± 7.7 | 11.2 ± 10.8 | < 0.001 |
| Successful intubation time, minutes | 14.1 ± 13.5 | 23.5 ± 22.3 | < 0.001 |
| Total procedure time, minutes | 31.0 ± 18.5 | 65.2 ± 37.9 | < 0.001 |
| Selective cannulation time, minutes | 3.9 ± 8.1 | 3.7 ± 6.8 | 0.780 |
| Naive papilla | 111 (44.9) | 123 (49.8) | 0.247 |
| Intubation failure | 14 (5.7) | 9 (3.6) | 0.393 |
| Selective cannulation failure | 26 (10.5) | 16 (6.5) | 0.147 |
| Difficult cannulation | 48 (19.4) | 50 (20.2) | 0.910 |
| Double guidewire method | 9 (3.6) | 20 (8.1) | 0.056 |
| Pancreatic duct injection | 14 (5.7) | 3 (1.2) | 0.014 |
| Pancreatic sphincterotomy | 0 (0.0) | 2 (0.8) | 0.479 |
| EPBD | 59 (23.9) | 152 (61.5) | < 0.001 |
| EST | 5 (2.0) | 70 (28.3) | < 0.001 |
| Endobiliary biopsy | 10 (4.0) | 32 (13.0) | 0.001 |
| Intraductal balloon dilation | 35 (14.2) | 29 (11.7) | 0.503 |
| Biliary stent placement | 90 (36.4) | 69 (27.9) | 0.054 |
| Pancreatic stent placement | 36 (14.6) | 21 (8.5) | 0.049 |
Table 3 Comparison of clinical outcomes between double-balloon enteroscopy and single-balloon enteroscopy group, n (%)/mean ± SD
| Variable | DBE (n = 247) | SBE (n = 247) | P value |
| Overall technical success | 218 (88.3) | 229 (92.7) | 0.125 |
| Technical success in 1st session | 217 (87.9) | 226 (91.5) | 0.237 |
| Total adverse events | 26 (10.5) | 36 (14.6) | 0.222 |
| Sedation related AE | 2 (0.8) | 3 (1.2) | 1.000 |
| Post-procedure pancreatitis | 12 (4.9) | 21 (8.5) | 0.149 |
| Mild | 12 (4.9) | 16 (6.5) | 0.125 |
| Moderately severe | 0 (0.0) | 4 (1.6) | |
| Severe | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.4) | |
| Pneumoperitoneum | 5 (2.0) | 1 (0.4) | 0.218 |
| Perforation | 2 (0.8) | 0 (0.0) | 0.479 |
| Significant bleeding | 4 (1.6) | 1 (0.4) | 0.369 |
| Post-ERCP cholecystitis | 0 (0.0) | 6 (2.4) | 0.040 |
| Post-ERCP cholangitis | 1 (0.4) | 9 (3.6) | 0.025 |
| Length of hospital stay, days, median (interquartile range) | 5.0 (1.0-9.0) | 5.0 (3.0-7.0) | 0.054 |
| Repeated ERCP within 30 days | 33 (13.4) | 26 (10.5) | 0.405 |
Table 4 Risk factors for the development of post-procedure adverse events
| Variable | Univariable analysis | Multivariable analysis | ||
| OR (95%CI) | P value | OR (95%CI) | P value | |
| SBE (vs DBE) | 1.74 (1.00-3.10) | 0.052 | 1.62 (0.82-3.23) | 0.164 |
| Age > 65 years | 1.01 (0.58-1.77) | 0.984 | ||
| Male sex | 1.05 (0.60-1.68) | 0.876 | ||
| History of acute pancreatitis | 0.42 (0.07-1.44) | 0.245 | ||
| Acute cholangitis on admission | 1.38 (0.79-2.39) | 0.256 | ||
| PTBD prior ERCP | 2.16 (0.83-5.00) | 0.087 | 1.79 (0.66-4.38) | 0.221 |
| PTGBD prior ERCP | 1.86 (0.60-4.80) | 0.230 | ||
| Resection | ||||
| PD (vs BDR) | 0.68 (0.22-2.20) | 0.510 | 0.36 (0.07-1.68) | 0.198 |
| STG (vs BDR) | 2.17 (0.93-5.97) | 0.096 | 0.04 (0.00-0.54) | 0.012 |
| TG (vs BDR) | 1.70 (0.62-5.11) | 0.314 | 0.04 (0.00-0.53) | 0.012 |
| Reconstruction | ||||
| B-II Braun (vs B-II) | 0.48 (0.21-1.02) | 0.063 | 0.60 (0.24-1.40) | 0.245 |
| R-Y (vs B-II) | 0.64 (0.34-1.19) | 0.154 | 0.49 (0.19-1.18) | 0.126 |
| Preserved gastric anatomy | 0.33 (0.16-0.62) | 0.001 | 0.03 (0.00-0.34) | 0.003 |
| Difficult cannulation | 2.42 (1.31-4.34) | 0.004 | 2.21 (1.12-4.32) | 0.021 |
| EPBD | 1.19 (0.68-2.07) | 0.530 | ||
| EST | 1.74 (0.86-3.34) | 0.106 | 0.89 (0.38-1.97) | 0.775 |
| Biliary stent placement | 1.03 (0.56-1.83) | 0.921 | ||
| Pancreatic stent placement | 0.87 (0.32-1.99) | 0.762 | ||
Table 5 Risk factors for the intubation failure
| Variable | Univariable analysis | Multivariable analysis | ||
| OR (95%CI) | P value | OR (95%CI) | P value | |
| SBE (vs DBE) | 0.63 (0.26-1.46) | 0.289 | ||
| Age > 65 years | 1.11 (0.48-2.71) | 0.813 | ||
| Male sex | 0.99 (0.42-2.42) | 0.979 | ||
| Acute cholangitis on admission | 1.18 (0.49-2.73) | 0.703 | ||
| PTBD prior ERCP | 2.21 (0.50-6.90) | 0.222 | ||
| Resection | ||||
| PD (vs BDR) | 0.50 (0.17-1.45) | 0.197 | ||
| STG (vs BDR) | 0.16 (0.04-0.54) | 0.004 | ||
| TG (vs BDR) | 0.38 (0.10-1.24) | 0.122 | ||
| Reconstruction | ||||
| B-II Braun (vs B-II) | 7.34 (1.28-138.32) | 0.064 | 5.13 (0.87-97.60) | 0.132 |
| R-Y (vs B-II) | 8.69 (1.73-158.02) | 0.037 | 8.65 (1.71-157.60) | 0.038 |
| Preserved gastric anatomy | 3.09 (1.31-7.80) | 0.012 | 3.18 (1.30-8.31) | 0.013 |
- Citation: Han SY, Yang MJ, Lee KJ, Lee J, Park SW. Comparison of clinical outcomes for single- and double-balloon enteroscope-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with surgically altered anatomy. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(41): 111022
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i41/111022.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i41.111022
