BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2025; 31(38): 111298
Published online Oct 14, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i38.111298
Table 1 Characteristics of participants by gastric ulcer status, n (%)
Variables
Total (n = 243)
Control (n = 77)
GU (n = 166)
P value
Age, median (Q1, Q3)60 (49, 70)49 (41, 59)65 (53, 72.75)< 0.001
Gender< 0.001
Female89 (37)44 (57)45 (27)
Male154 (63)33 (43)121 (73)
Marital status0.470
No9 (4)4 (5)5 (3)
Yes234 (96)73 (95)161 (97)
Hypertension< 0.001
No160 (66)65 (84)95 (57)
Yes83 (34)12 (16)71 (43)
Diabetes< 0.001
No208 (86)75 (97)133 (80)
Yes35 (14)2 (3)33 (20)
Stroke0.006
No229 (94)77 (100)152 (92)
Yes14 (6)0 (0)14 (8)
SCr, median (Q1, Q3)76.5 (61.2, 89.87)68.93 (58.2, 79.3)79.21 (65.2, 100.39)< 0.001
BUN, median (Q1, Q3)5.92 (4.74, 10.50)5.03 (4.32, 5.67)7.85 (5.2, 12.87)< 0.001
eGFR< 0.001
eGFR < 90104 (43)19 (25)85 (51)
eGFR ≥ 90139 (57)58 (75)81 (49)
NLR, median (Q1, Q3)2.76 (1.76, 4.9)1.77 (1.38, 2.44)3.64 (2.25, 6.09)< 0.001
MLR, median (Q1, Q3)0.26 (0.19, 0.39)0.18 (0.14, 0.24)0.33 (0.23, 0.44)< 0.001
PLR, median (Q1, Q3)139.58 (101.62, 188.03)129.38 (98.43, 154.55)151.5 (105.71, 212.56)0.012
SIRI, median (Q1, Q3)1.14 (0.65, 2.1)0.55 (0.39, 0.88)1.7 (1.01, 2.67)< 0.001
SII, median (Q1, Q3)597.49 (362.79, 1029.33)378.86 (286.71, 536)710.16 (458.43, 1283.22)< 0.001
AISI, median (Q1, Q3)243.99 (118.20, 480.31)115.65 (86.15, 192.96)332.51 (198.92, 665.44)< 0.001
log2 NLR, median (Q1, Q3)1.47 (0.82, 2.29)0.82 (0.46, 1.29)1.86 (1.17, 2.61)< 0.001
log2 MLR, median (Q1, Q3)-1.93 (-2.43, -1.35)-2.49 (-2.82, -2.08)-1.61 (-2.12, -1.2)< 0.001
log2 PLR, median (Q1, Q3)7.12 (6.67, 7.55)7.02 (6.62, 7.27)7.24 (6.72, 7.73)0.012
log2 SIRI, median (Q1, Q3)0.19 (-0.61, 1.07)-0.87 (-1.37, -0.18)0.77 (0.02, 1.41)< 0.001
log2 SII, median (Q1, Q3)9.22 (8.5, 10.01)8.57 (8.16, 9.07)9.47 (8.84, 10.33)< 0.001
log2 AISI, median (Q1, Q3)7.93 (6.89, 8.91)6.85 (6.43, 7.59)8.38 (7.64, 9.38)< 0.001
Table 2 Results of weighted logistic regression analysis examining the association between complete blood count-derived inflammatory markers and gastric ulcer
Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
OR (95%CI)
P value
OR (95%CI)
P value
OR (95%CI)
P value
log2 NLR4.5 (2.87, 7.05)< 0.0013.85 (2.35, 6.29)< 0.0013.20 (1.85, 5.56)< 0.001
log2 MLR5.01 (3.01, 8.34)< 0.0013.79 (2.20, 6.52)< 0.0014.14 (2.31, 7.44)< 0.001
log2 PLR1.14 (0.88, 1.48)0.3331.20 (0.87, 1.65)0.2731.49 (1.04, 2.12)0.029
log2 SIRI4.01 (2.72, 5.89)< 0.0013.74 (2.43, 5.76)< 0.0013.04 (1.94, 4.77)< 0.001
log2 SII1.86 (1.42, 2.43)< 0.0011.90 (1.40, 2.58)< 0.0011.83 (1.33, 2.50)< 0.001
log2 AISI1.96 (1.55, 2.48)< 0.0012.05 (1.57, 2.67)< 0.0011.94 (1.45, 2.57)< 0.001