Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2025; 31(38): 111298
Published online Oct 14, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i38.111298
Published online Oct 14, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i38.111298
Table 1 Characteristics of participants by gastric ulcer status, n (%)
Variables | Total (n = 243) | Control (n = 77) | GU (n = 166) | P value |
Age, median (Q1, Q3) | 60 (49, 70) | 49 (41, 59) | 65 (53, 72.75) | < 0.001 |
Gender | < 0.001 | |||
Female | 89 (37) | 44 (57) | 45 (27) | |
Male | 154 (63) | 33 (43) | 121 (73) | |
Marital status | 0.470 | |||
No | 9 (4) | 4 (5) | 5 (3) | |
Yes | 234 (96) | 73 (95) | 161 (97) | |
Hypertension | < 0.001 | |||
No | 160 (66) | 65 (84) | 95 (57) | |
Yes | 83 (34) | 12 (16) | 71 (43) | |
Diabetes | < 0.001 | |||
No | 208 (86) | 75 (97) | 133 (80) | |
Yes | 35 (14) | 2 (3) | 33 (20) | |
Stroke | 0.006 | |||
No | 229 (94) | 77 (100) | 152 (92) | |
Yes | 14 (6) | 0 (0) | 14 (8) | |
SCr, median (Q1, Q3) | 76.5 (61.2, 89.87) | 68.93 (58.2, 79.3) | 79.21 (65.2, 100.39) | < 0.001 |
BUN, median (Q1, Q3) | 5.92 (4.74, 10.50) | 5.03 (4.32, 5.67) | 7.85 (5.2, 12.87) | < 0.001 |
eGFR | < 0.001 | |||
eGFR < 90 | 104 (43) | 19 (25) | 85 (51) | |
eGFR ≥ 90 | 139 (57) | 58 (75) | 81 (49) | |
NLR, median (Q1, Q3) | 2.76 (1.76, 4.9) | 1.77 (1.38, 2.44) | 3.64 (2.25, 6.09) | < 0.001 |
MLR, median (Q1, Q3) | 0.26 (0.19, 0.39) | 0.18 (0.14, 0.24) | 0.33 (0.23, 0.44) | < 0.001 |
PLR, median (Q1, Q3) | 139.58 (101.62, 188.03) | 129.38 (98.43, 154.55) | 151.5 (105.71, 212.56) | 0.012 |
SIRI, median (Q1, Q3) | 1.14 (0.65, 2.1) | 0.55 (0.39, 0.88) | 1.7 (1.01, 2.67) | < 0.001 |
SII, median (Q1, Q3) | 597.49 (362.79, 1029.33) | 378.86 (286.71, 536) | 710.16 (458.43, 1283.22) | < 0.001 |
AISI, median (Q1, Q3) | 243.99 (118.20, 480.31) | 115.65 (86.15, 192.96) | 332.51 (198.92, 665.44) | < 0.001 |
log2 NLR, median (Q1, Q3) | 1.47 (0.82, 2.29) | 0.82 (0.46, 1.29) | 1.86 (1.17, 2.61) | < 0.001 |
log2 MLR, median (Q1, Q3) | -1.93 (-2.43, -1.35) | -2.49 (-2.82, -2.08) | -1.61 (-2.12, -1.2) | < 0.001 |
log2 PLR, median (Q1, Q3) | 7.12 (6.67, 7.55) | 7.02 (6.62, 7.27) | 7.24 (6.72, 7.73) | 0.012 |
log2 SIRI, median (Q1, Q3) | 0.19 (-0.61, 1.07) | -0.87 (-1.37, -0.18) | 0.77 (0.02, 1.41) | < 0.001 |
log2 SII, median (Q1, Q3) | 9.22 (8.5, 10.01) | 8.57 (8.16, 9.07) | 9.47 (8.84, 10.33) | < 0.001 |
log2 AISI, median (Q1, Q3) | 7.93 (6.89, 8.91) | 6.85 (6.43, 7.59) | 8.38 (7.64, 9.38) | < 0.001 |
Table 2 Results of weighted logistic regression analysis examining the association between complete blood count-derived inflammatory markers and gastric ulcer
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
OR (95%CI) | P value | OR (95%CI) | P value | OR (95%CI) | P value | |
log2 NLR | 4.5 (2.87, 7.05) | < 0.001 | 3.85 (2.35, 6.29) | < 0.001 | 3.20 (1.85, 5.56) | < 0.001 |
log2 MLR | 5.01 (3.01, 8.34) | < 0.001 | 3.79 (2.20, 6.52) | < 0.001 | 4.14 (2.31, 7.44) | < 0.001 |
log2 PLR | 1.14 (0.88, 1.48) | 0.333 | 1.20 (0.87, 1.65) | 0.273 | 1.49 (1.04, 2.12) | 0.029 |
log2 SIRI | 4.01 (2.72, 5.89) | < 0.001 | 3.74 (2.43, 5.76) | < 0.001 | 3.04 (1.94, 4.77) | < 0.001 |
log2 SII | 1.86 (1.42, 2.43) | < 0.001 | 1.90 (1.40, 2.58) | < 0.001 | 1.83 (1.33, 2.50) | < 0.001 |
log2 AISI | 1.96 (1.55, 2.48) | < 0.001 | 2.05 (1.57, 2.67) | < 0.001 | 1.94 (1.45, 2.57) | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Shen Q, Sun ZH, Xu YM, Hu QB, Zhang WH, Huang SA. Associations between complete-blood-count-derived inflammatory markers and gastric ulcer: A cross-sectional study. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(38): 111298
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i38/111298.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i38.111298