Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 21, 2025; 31(35): 110241
Published online Sep 21, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i35.110241
Published online Sep 21, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i35.110241
Table 1 Criteria for exclusion, suspicion, and diagnosis of compensated advanced chronic liver disease and indications for endoscopy based on non-invasive diagnostic tests according to Baveno VI and VII
Baveno VI[20], 2015 | Baveno VII[1], 2022 | |
Exclusion of cACLD | TE1 < 10 kPa and absence of clinical symptoms of disease | TE1 < 10 kPa and absence of clinical and imaging signs of disease |
Suspicion of cACLD | TE1 10-15 kPa | TE1 10-15 kPa |
High suspicion of cACLD | TE1 > 15 kPa | TE1 > 15 kPa |
Diagnosis of cACLD | Advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis in histopathological examination; Esophageal varices; HVPG > 5 mmHg | Definition of cACLD based on liver stiffness measurement |
Exclusion of CSPH in cACLD | No recommendation | TE1 ≤ 15 kPa and PLT ≥ 150000/μL |
Confirmation of CSPH in cACLD | HVPG ≥ 10 mmHg; TE1 ≤ 20-25 kPa alone or in combination with PLT and spleen size assessment (in the etiology of viral liver disease); Imaging studies showing collateral circulation | TE1 ≥ 25 kPa (applies to patients with cACLD related to virus and/or alcohol and/or NASH without obesity) |
Indications for endoscopy | TE1 ≥ 20 kPa or PLT ≤ 150000/μL | TE1 ≥ 20 kPa or PLT ≤ 150000/μL |
SSM | No recommendation | It can be used in chronic viral hepatitis to exclude CSPH (< 21 kPa) and diagnose CSPH (> 50 kPa); In individuals with SSM ≤ 40 kPa, endoscopy can be omitted |
Table 2 Prevention of first variceal bleeding
Baveno version (reference) - year of publication | NSBBs indications | Carvedilol | EBL |
I[8], 1992 | Recommended for high-risk varices, but not for small varices | Not mentioned | Not recommended |
II[16], 1996 | NSBBs confirmed as primary therapy for large varices | Not mentioned | Potentially valuable but role unclear |
III[17], 2000 | First-line treatment for large varices, but not indicated for small varices | Not mentioned | Alternative to NSBBs for large varices, but role uncertain |
IV[18], 2005 | Expanded to include small varices with high-risk features | First mentioned as a possible alternative to traditional NSBBs | Recommended for patients intolerant to NSBBs, but long-term benefits uncertain |
V[19], 2010 | Further expanded to all small varices, even without high-risk signs | Suggested to have potential advantages over propranolol/nadolol | Recommended for medium/Large varices |
VI[20], 2015 | Confirmed for all small varices to prevent progression and bleeding | More effective than traditional NSBBs in reducing HVPG | Recommended for medium/Large varices |
VII[1], 20221 | Recommended for CSPH to prevent decompensation | Preferred for compensated cirrhosis | Recommended for high-risk varices in NSBB-intolerant patients |
Table 3 Evolution for the management of acute bleeding across Baveno guidelines
Baveno version (reference), year of publication | Endoscopic treatment | Pharmacological treatment | Balloon tamponade | TIPS | Antibiotic prophylaxis | Failure to control bleeding criteria |
I[8], 1992 | ASAP; AEVB: No consensus, sclerotherapy proposed as the primary treatment | Vasoactive drugs for gastric variceal bleeding | If continued bleeding (or rebleeding within 24-36 hours) despite treatment | No recommendations | No recommendations | No consensus |
II[16], 1996 | Endoscopic techniques were the treatment of choice for AEVB; Tissue adhesives and thrombin suggested for AGVB | Terlipressin and somatostatin shown to be effective; Insufficient data on octreotide | Reserved for emergency cases | Rescue option if endoscopic and pharmacological treatments fail | No recommendations | Two failure timeframes: < 6 hours and > 6 hours; rebleeding defined > 48 hours |
III[17], 2000 | ASAP (within 12 hours); EBL established as superior to sclerotherapy for AEVB; Insufficient data on tissue adhesives and EBL for AGVB | Vasoactive drugs recommended in suspected AEVB; ASAP (before endoscopy); Use to 5 days; In combination with endoscopic techniques; Vasoactive drugs suggested for bleeding from PHG | Reserved for massive bleeding as a bridge to definitive treatment | TIPS or shunt surgery for PHG if pharmacological therapy fails | No recommendations | As above |
IV[18], 2005 | ASAP (within 12 hours); EBL preferred for AEVB (sclerotherapy as an alternative); Tissue adhesive is recommended for AGVB | Vasoactive drugs (terlipressin, somatostatin, vapreotide, octreotide) recommended in suspected AEVB; ASAP (before endoscopy); Use to 5 days; In combination with endoscopic techniques | As above | TIPS with PTFE-covered stents recommended in case of treatment failure | No recommendations | Fresh hematemesis 2 hours after treatment, 3 g drop in Hb without transfusion, increased blood transfusion requirement1, death |
V[19], 2010 | ASAP (within 12 hours); EBL preferred, sclerotherapy as an alternative; Tissue adhesive is recommended for AGVB from IGV and GOV2; EBL or tissue adhesive can be used in AGVB from GOV1 | As above | As above | Early TIPS within 72 hours for high-risk patients; TIPS with PTFE-covered stents recommended in case of treatment failure | Antibiotic prophylaxis became an integral part of therapy in with cirrhosis | As above |
VI[20], 2015 | Requirement for 24/7 availability of an endoscopist proficient in hemostasis; ASAP (within 12 hours); EBL recommended for AEVB; Tissue adhesive is recommended for AGVB from IGV and GOV2; EBL or tissue adhesive can be used in AGVB from GOV1 | As above, but vapreotide was not mentioned | Only in refractory esophageal bleeding, as a temporary ‘‘bridge’’ (for a maximum of 24 hours) | Early TIPS within 72 hours for high-risk patients (further specification of indications); TIPS with PTFE-covered stents recommended in case of treatment failure | As above | No changes |
VII[1], 2022 | As above; but patients with suspected AEVB should undergo upper endoscopy within 12 hours, If the patient is unstable, endoscopy should be performed as soon as safely possible; APC, radio-frequency ablation or EBL for PHG and GAVE bleeding | As above | As above but self-expandable metal stents self-expandable metal stents preferred due to safety | As above | As above | Absence of control of bleeding or by rebleeding within the first 5 days |
Table 4 Prevention of recurrent bleeding from varices
Baveno version (reference), year of publication | First-line therapy | Alternative therapy | Rescue therapy (failure of first-line) | Gastric varices | Special considerations |
I[8], 1992 | Traditional NSBBs or sclerotherapy | No specific recommendation | Sclerotherapy, NSBBs, surgical shunt, and liver transplantation | Traditional NSBBs | Risk assessment debated |
II[16], 1996 | Traditional NSBBs or EBL | Combined therapy proposed but untested | TIPS or surgical shunts | No specific recommendation | Consider transplantation for advanced cirrhosis |
III[17], 2000 | Traditional NSBBs or EBL | EBL preferred in NSBB-intolerant patients; Combined therapy should be further investigated | TIPS or surgical shunts | No specific recommendation | Consider transplantation for advanced liver disease |
IV[18], 2005 | Traditional NSBBs + EBL | EBL preferred in NSBB-intolerant patients | TIPS or surgical shunts for Child-Pugh A/B patients; Liver transplantation for Child-Pugh B/C patients | IGV1, GOV2: N-butyl-cyanoacrylate, TIPS or NSBBs; GOV1: N-butyl-cyanoacrylate, EBL, NSBBs | Start prophylaxis by day 6 |
V[19], 2010 | Traditional NSBBs + EBL | EBL preferred in NSBB-intolerant patients; The addition of ISMN to NSBBs for hemodynamic non-responders; Those who are unable or unwilling to be treated with EBL: NSBBs + ISMN | TIPS preferred; Surgical shunt in Child-Pugh A and B pts if TIPS is unavailable; Transplantation should be considered | IGV1, GOV2: N-butyl-cyanoacrylate or TIPS; GOV1: N-butyl-cyanoacrylate, EBL, NSBBs | TIPS as bridge to transplantation |
VI[20], 2015 | Traditional NSBBs + EBL | NSBB monotherapy if EBL contraindicated; EBL monotherapy only if intolerance/contraindications to NSBB | TIPS preferred | No specific recommendation | PHG has to be distinguished from GAVE because treatments are different |
VII[1], 2022 | Traditional NSBBs (including carvedilol) + EBL | Any therapy alone if intolerance the combination therapy | TIPS preferred | No specific recommendation | Argon plasma coagulation or hemospray were introduced for recurrent bleeding in PHG |
- Citation: Brzdęk M, Dobrowolska K, Janczura J, Wajdowicz M, Brzdęk K, Zarębska-Michaluk D, Gąsiorowska A, Mangia A. Advances in portal hypertension management: Evolution of the Baveno guidelines. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(35): 110241
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i35/110241.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i35.110241