BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2025; 31(33): 107408
Published online Sep 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i33.107408
Table 1 Comparison of the general characteristics of the modeling group
Parameter
Patients with compensatory stage of cirrhosis, n = 72
Patients with decompensation of cirrhosis, n = 68
T value/χ2value
P value
Age, years52.83 ± 12.253.16 ± 10.9-0.1680.867
Male (%)40 (55.6)40 (58.8)0.1530.696
Etiology, HBV/HCV52/2062/68.3080.004
Table 2 Comparison of general characteristics in the external validation group
Parameter
Patients with compensatory stage of cirrhosis, n = 28
Patients with decompensation of cirrhosis, n = 32
T value/χ2value
P value
Age, years52.54 ± 13.754.97 ± 10.4-0.7800.438
Male (%)15 (53.6)14 (43.8)0.5770.448
Etiology, HBV/HCV25/330/20.0240.876
Table 3 Univariate analysis of parameters in patients with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis
Parameter
Patients with compensatory stage of cirrhosis, n = 72
Patients with decompensation of cirrhosis, n = 68
t/Z
P value
SSM, kPa23.50 ± 6.118.32 ± 4.25.866< 0.001
PLT, × 109/L110.51 ± 69.161.81 ± 25.75.463< 0.001
LSM, kPa15.53 ± 5.723.86 ± 5.2-9.023< 0.001
ALT, IU/L36.00 (24.00, 47.75)27.50 (17.00, 42.25)-2.4900.013
AST, IU/L40.50 (26.75, 58.75)38.00 (29.00, 56.75)-0.4520.651
ALP, IU/L105.00 (77.50, 143.00)98.50 (79.25, 135.50)-0.7090.478
GGT, IU/L61.00 (28.00, 120.00)34.50 (19.25, 59.50)-3.718< 0.001
SLD, mm12.99 ± 3.015.68 ± 3.1-5.282< 0.001
TBIL, μmol/L29.64 ± 27.031.27 ± 16.2-0.4300.668
ALB, g/dL38.69 ± 6.434.43 ± 7.43.691< 0.001
TCHO, mmol/L3.67 ± 1.33.09 ± 0.92.9390.004
PT, seconds12.08 ± 1.913.70 ± 2.5-4.322< 0.001
INR1.10 ± 0.21.24 ± 0.2-4.029< 0.001
PTA,%84.91 ± 18.972.37 ± 17.04.123< 0.001
PVD, mm12.03 ± 1.613.78 ± 2.4-5.072< 0.001
CTLV, cm31055.93 ± 344.8898.64 ± 257.33.0450.003
CTSV, cm3519.10 ± 296.0842.19 ± 416.3-5.315< 0.001
Table 4 Multivariate analysis of parameters in patients with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis
Parameter
Patients with compensatory stage of cirrhosis, n = 72
Patients with decompensation of cirrhosis, n = 68
t/Z
P value
SSM, kPa23.50 ± 6.118.32 ± 4.25.866< 0.001
PLT, × 109/L110.51 ± 69.161.81 ± 25.75.4630.575
LSM, kPa15.53 ± 5.723.86 ± 5.2-9.023< 0.001
ALT, IU/L36.00 (24.00, 47.75)27.50 (17.00, 42.25)-2.4900.597
GGT, IU/L61.00 (28.00, 120.00)34.50 (19.25, 59.50)-3.7180.566
SLD, mm12.99 ± 3.015.68 ± 3.1-5.2820.037
ALB, g/dL38.69 ± 6.434.43 ± 7.43.6310.207
TCHO, mmol/L3.67 ± 1.33.09 ± 0.92.9390.224
PT, seconds12.08 ± 1.913.70 ± 2.5-4.3220.480
INR1.10 ± 0.21.24 ± 0.2-4.0290.584
PTA,%84.91 ± 18.972.37 ± 17.04.1230.623
PVD, mm12.03 ± 1.613.78 ± 2.4-5.0720.773
CTLV, cm31055.93 ± 344.8898.64 ± 257.33.0450.967
CTSV, cm3519.10 ± 296.0842.19 ± 416.3-5.3150.895
Table 5 Parameters used to establish the noninvasive prediction model
Parameter
B
SE
Wald
Sig
Exp (B)
95%CI of exp (B)
SSM-0.2790.06617.768< 0.0010.7560.664-0.861
LSM0.3480.06726.728< 0.0011.4161.241-1.616
SLD0.2720.1106.0530.0141.3121.057-1.630
Constant-4.9692.2454.8990.0270.007
Table 6 Comparison of various parameters of each model

Area
SE
Sig
95%CI of exp (B)
LSPS0.8340.034< 0.0010.767-0.901
VRI0.8240.035< 0.0010.756-0.891
AAR0.6700.0460.0010.580-0.760
Baveno VI10.6800.045< 0.0010.591-0.769
The new model0.9440.018< 0.0010.910-0.979
Table 7 Comparison of various parameters of each model

Sensitivity, (%)
Specificity, (%)
Accuracy, (%)
Positive predictive value
Negative predictive value
Youden index
Cutoff value
LSPS95.5959.7273.6069.1793.470.552.71
VRI66.1884.7272.9080.3772.600.510.80
AAR76.4756.9457.1062.6771.900.331.28
Baveno VI198.5337.5067.1059.8596.430.36
The new model85.2988.8985.0087.8986.470.740.56