Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2025; 31(28): 105089
Published online Jul 28, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i28.105089
Table 1 Clinical trials and animal studies on fecal microbiota transplantation for chronic liver disease treatment
Disease
Ref.
Year
Type
Comparison
Frequency
Key findings
MASLD/NAFLDZhou et al[20]2017MiceControl vs HFD vs HFD + FMT8 consecutive weeksFMT mitigated HFD-induced steatohepatitis through its beneficial effects on intestinal microbiota
García-Lezana et al[21]2018RatAutologous FMT vs allogenic FMTOnceAllogeneic FMT led to a significant decrease in portal vein pressure
Witjes et al[22]2020HumanAutologous FMT vs lean vegan donor FMT3 times within eight weeksAfter allogeneic FMT, the expression of hepatic genes related to lipid metabolism and inflammation was significantly reduced. The observed changes in intestinal microbiota composition were found to be connected to changes in plasma metabolites and markers
Craven et al[23]2020HumanAutologous FMT vs allogenic FMTOncePatients who received allogeneic FMT showed a significant reduction in intestinal permeability after 6 weeks
Xue et al[24]2022HumanOral probiotics vs FMT + three enemasOnceFMT effectively improved the therapeutic outcomes in NAFLD patients. It demonstrated greater efficacy in lean NAFLD patients than those with obesity
ALDLlopis et al[11]2016MiceSAH FMT vs alcoholism FMTOnceTransplanting intestinal microbiota from mice with alcoholism, but without AH, alleviated alcohol-induced liver injury
Ferrere et al[28]2017MicePectin vs FMTOne per weekManipulating the intestinal microbiota can prevent alcohol-induced liver injury, positioning it as a new therapeutic target for ALD
Wolstenholme et al[29]2022MicePlacebo vs FMTOnceMice in the FMT group reduced ethanol acceptance, intake, and preference
Philips et al[30]2017HumanCase report7 consecutive daysAfter FMT, clinical indicators, biochemical markers, and severity scores improved in SAH patients, with significant changes in intestinal microbiota observed
Philips et al[31]2017HumanControl vs FMT7 consecutive daysAfter FMT, there was a improvement in liver disease severity, an increase in survival rates, and notable changes in the composition of the intestinal microbiota
Philips et al[32]2018HumanCorticosteroids vs nutrition vs pentoxifylline vs FMT7 consecutive daysFMT showed a higher survival rate compared to other treatments for SAH, potentially serving as a cost-effective bridge to liver transplantation or improving survival without it
Philips et al[33]2022HumanPentoxifylline vs FMT7 consecutive daysFMT improves 6-month survival and reduces liver-related complications, related to beneficial modulation of the gut microbiota
Philips et al[34]2022HumanSOC vs FMT7 consecutive daysFMT significantly reduces ascites, infections, encephalopathy, and alcohol relapse, with a trend toward higher survival, associated with beneficial modulation of the gut microbiota
Sharma et al[35]2022HumanSOC vs FMTOnceFMT is safe and could improve short- and medium-term survival rates, and clinical severity scores in patients with SAH-ACLF
Pande et al[36]2023HumanPrednisolone vs FMT28 consecutive daysFMT is safe, improves 90-day survival, and reduces infections by positively modulating microbial communities
CHBRen et al[39]2017HumanAntiviral therapy vs antiviral therapy + FMTOnce every 4 weeks, until HBeAg clearance was achievedIn patients with sustained positive HBeAg after long-term antiviral therapy, FMT can reduce or even eliminate HBeAg levels
Chauhan et al[40]2021HumanAntiviral therapy vs antiviral therapy + FMTOnce every 4 weeks for a total of six timesFMT is safe and effective in HBeAg clearance in HBeAg-positive CHB patients
PSCPhilips et al[43]2018HumanCase reportOnce a week for a total of four timesAfter FMT, significant changes were observed in the liver biochemistry, bile acids, and the composition of the intestinal microbiota in PSC patients
Allegretti et al[46]2019HumanControl vs FMTOnceThe improvement in ALP levels may be linked to an increase in the diversity of the intestinal microbiota, as well as the frequency of FMT
AIHLiang et al[47]2021MiceControl vs FMT28 consecutive daysFMT can alleviate liver injury and bacterial translocation, partially reverse the elevation of serum ALT and AST, restore the balance between follicular regulatory T and helper T cells in the spleen, and effectively correct the intestinal microbiota dysbiosis
Cirrhosis/HEWang et al[51]2017RatControl vs probiotics vs low-dose FMT vs moderate-dose FMT vs high-dose FMT3 consecutive weeksFMT prevents liver necrosis, improves behavioral performance, HE scores, and spatial learning ability in rats, enhances the expression of intestinal tight junction proteins, and repairs intestinal mucosal barrier damage. It also reduces the expression of TLR4 and TLR9 in the liver, along with a decrease in circulating pro-inflammatory factors (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF)
Kao et al[52]2016HumanCase reportOnce a week for 5 timesFMT can reverse intestinal microbiota dysbiosis and lead to the obvious improvement of cognitive function in dominant HE
Bajaj et al[53]2017HumanSOC vs FMT + SOCOnceFMT can reduce the hospitalization rate, improve cognitive function, and restore intestinal microbiota dysbiosis
Bajaj et al[54]2019HumanSOC vs FMT + SOCOnceFollow-up for more than one year demonstrated that the positive effects of FMT may be long-lasting
Bajaj et al[55]2019HumanPlacebo capsules vs FMT capsules15 capsulesOral FMT capsules are safe and well-tolerated. FMT is associated with improvements in duodenal mucosal diversity, intestinal microbiota dysbiosis, and AMP expression, along with a decrease in LBP levels and better performance in the brain App test
Bajaj et al[56]2019HumanPlacebo capsules vs FMT capsules15 capsulesFMT has a beneficial effect on the intestinal microbiome function in patients with cirrhosis, leading to improvements in inflammation and cognitive performance. However, recipients with lower levels of secondary bile acids may experience poorer outcomes
Bloom et al[57]2022HumanCase report5 doses of 15 capsules within 3 weeksFMT capsules improved cognitive performance in patients with HE, with the effect varying based on both donor and recipient factors
Mehta et al[59]2018HumanCase reportOnceFMT can significantly reduce arterial ammonia concentrations, alleviate neurological symptoms, and lower CTP and MELD scores in patients with HE
Li et al[60]2022HumanCase report3 timesFMT can improve liver function, relieve clinical symptoms, and significantly reduce the number of HE episodes in patients
Huang et al[61]2021RatSham operation vs BDL vs BDL + FMT vs BDL + GMT5 consecutive daysFMT increased the abundance of Bifidobacterium and significantly reduced portal vein pressure
Bajaj et al[62]2018HumanSOC vs SOC + antibiotic + FMTOnceFMT has also been shown to restore the diversity and function of the intestinal microbiota altered by antibiotics in patients with advanced cirrhosis who are treated with lactulose and rifaximin
Table 2 Ongoing clinical trials of fecal microbiota transplantation in chronic liver diseases from Clinicaltrial.gov
Disease or condition
Study title
Study arms
Intervention
Primary outcomes measures
Clinical trials ID, country
NAFLD, NASHFecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitisLean healthy donor frozen FMTEfficacy (histological resolution of NASH defined as ballooning disappearance with or without persistence of minimal lobulillar inflammation and no progression of fibrosis stage) (time frame: 72 weeks)NCT03803540, Spain
NAFLDEffects of fecal microbiota transplantation on weight in obese patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver diseaseDiet + exercise + FMT vs diet + exercise3 times IMT with 15-day intervalsProportion of patients achieving ≤ 5% of the weight loss in kg from baseline (time frame: 3 months)NCT04594954, India
NAFLDDietary counseling coupled with FMT in the treatment of obesity and NAFLD-the DIFTOB studyHealthy diet counseling + FMT vs healthy diet counseling + placeboA change in HOMA-IR (time frame: At week 12 and at week 52)NCT05607745, Finland
NAFLD with history of diabetes melitusA prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study to characterize the intestinal microbiome and to evaluate the safety and fecal microbiome changes following administration of lyophilized PRIM-DJ2727 or placebo given orally for 12 weeks in subjects with NAFLDOral PRIM-DJ2727 vs oral placebotwice weekly for 12 weeksMicrobiome diversity in fecal samples as indicated by the Shannon diversity index (time frame: 10 months)NCT04371653
NASHEvaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of fecal microbiota transfer for the treatment of patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitisCapsules of FMT vs capsules of placeboAn initial dose of 24 oral capsules and a maintenance dose of 12 oral capsules every 3 months for 12 monthsProportion of patients with improvement of fat fraction by proton density by MRI and no worsening of activity or fibrosis (time frame: 72 weeks)NCT05622526
NASHFecal microbiota therapy versus standard therapy in NASH related cirrhosisFMT vs standard treatment careOnce a month for 5 monthsReduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient in the two groups from baseline (time frame: 1 year)NCT02721264, India
Alcohol-related liver disease, alcohol use disorder, cirrhosisIntestinal microbiota transplant in alcohol-associated chronic liver disease and cirrhosisIMT capsules vs placebo capsulesTwice during the trialChange in alcohol consumption (time frame: Baseline to 3 months after treatment)NCT05548452, United States
Liver disease, alcohol dependence, HE and etc.Safety and efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantationFMTThe efficacy of FMT in treating dysbiosis-associated disorder will be assessed by number of patients who have improvement in clinical symptoms (depends on each disease as stated in outcome) (time frame: 1 year)NCT04014413, HongKong, China
SAHA comparison of fecal microbiota transplantation and steroid therapy in patients with severe alcoholic hepatitisFMT vs steroids7 daysProportion of participants with overall survival at 3 months (time frame: 3 months)NCT03091010, India
SAHFecal microbiota transplantation in severe alcoholic hepatitis- assessment of impact on prognosis and short-term outcomeFMT vs standard of care treatment1 timeSurvival (time frame: 3 months)NCT03827772, India
AHFecal microbiota therapy in steroid ineligible alcoholic hepatitisFMT vs standard medical treatment7 timesMortality at 3 months (time frame: 3 months), liver transplant free survival (time frame: 3 months)NCT05285592, India
AHSafety evaluation of fecal microbiota transplantation in severe alcoholic hepatitisStandard of care + oral PRIM-DJ2727 vs oral placeboEvery day for a week followed by once weekly for 3 weeksTo assess survival in patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis receiving PRIM-DJ2727 capsules in comparison to standard of care (time frame: Day 1 to 12 months)NCT05006430, United States
CHBStudy on effect of intestinal microbiota transplantation in chronic hepatitis BIMT + antiviral therapy vs antiviral therapy6 times IMT with 2-week intervalsChange of serum HBeAg level (Time Frame: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months)NCT03429439, China
HBV induced cirrhosisStudy on effect of intestinal microbiota transplantation in hepatitis B virus induced cirrhosisIntestinal microbiota transplantation4 times IMT with 2-week intervalsChange of liver Fibroscan score (time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months)NCT03437876, China
Acute-on-chronic liver failure, hepatitis BEfficacy of addition of FMT and plasma exchange to tenofovir in comparison to monotherapy with tenofovir in ACLF-HBVPlasma exchange + tenofovir + FMT vs tenofovir7 daysOverall survival in both groups (time frame: Day 28)NCT04431375, India
Decompensated cirrhosisFecal microbiota transplantation for decompensated cirrhosisFMT + traditional treatment vs traditional treatmentNumber of adverse events complication rate in all patients in both groups (time frame: 3 months)NCT03014505, Chian
Cirrhosis, liverFecal microbiota transplantation in cirrhosisFMT vs controlBlood ammonia, ALT, AST, gut microbiome, albumin, blood glucose, serum creatinine, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, prothrombin time activity percentage and liver stiffness (time frame: Change from baseline, at 12 months)NCT04591522
Cirrhosis of the liverTrial of faecal microbiota transplantation in cirrhosisFMT vs placeboAssessment of the feasibility of FMT (time frame: 18 months)NCT02862249, United Kingdom
Liver cirrhosisFaecal microbiota transplantation for liver cirrhosisFMT vs placebo3 timesTime to death or readmission due to episode of acute decompensation in FMT treated vs placebo treated patients (Time Frame: 1 year)NCT04932577, Denmark
Cirrhosis, HEFMT in cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathyDual oral and rectal FMT vs oral FMT and rectal placebo vs oral placebo and rectal FMT vs oral and rectal placeboAdverse events related to FMT (time frame: 6 months), change in microbial diversity in stool (time frame: 6 months)NCT03796598, United States
HEFecal microbiota transplant as treatment of hepatic encephalopathyFMT oral capsules vs placebo oral capsuledays 1, 2, 7, 14, and 21PHES [time frame: Before the first administration of FMT (day 0) and one week after the last administration of FMT (day 28)]NCT03420482, United States
HEEfficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplant for secondary prophylaxis of hepatic encephalopathyFMT + standard medical therapy vs standard medical therapy3 timesProportion of patients developing an episode of hepatic encephalopathy within 6 months (time frame: 6 months)NCT05229289, India