Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2025; 31(28): 105089
Published online Jul 28, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i28.105089
Published online Jul 28, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i28.105089
Table 1 Clinical trials and animal studies on fecal microbiota transplantation for chronic liver disease treatment
Disease | Ref. | Year | Type | Comparison | Frequency | Key findings |
MASLD/NAFLD | Zhou et al[20] | 2017 | Mice | Control vs HFD vs HFD + FMT | 8 consecutive weeks | FMT mitigated HFD-induced steatohepatitis through its beneficial effects on intestinal microbiota |
García-Lezana et al[21] | 2018 | Rat | Autologous FMT vs allogenic FMT | Once | Allogeneic FMT led to a significant decrease in portal vein pressure | |
Witjes et al[22] | 2020 | Human | Autologous FMT vs lean vegan donor FMT | 3 times within eight weeks | After allogeneic FMT, the expression of hepatic genes related to lipid metabolism and inflammation was significantly reduced. The observed changes in intestinal microbiota composition were found to be connected to changes in plasma metabolites and markers | |
Craven et al[23] | 2020 | Human | Autologous FMT vs allogenic FMT | Once | Patients who received allogeneic FMT showed a significant reduction in intestinal permeability after 6 weeks | |
Xue et al[24] | 2022 | Human | Oral probiotics vs FMT + three enemas | Once | FMT effectively improved the therapeutic outcomes in NAFLD patients. It demonstrated greater efficacy in lean NAFLD patients than those with obesity | |
ALD | Llopis et al[11] | 2016 | Mice | SAH FMT vs alcoholism FMT | Once | Transplanting intestinal microbiota from mice with alcoholism, but without AH, alleviated alcohol-induced liver injury |
Ferrere et al[28] | 2017 | Mice | Pectin vs FMT | One per week | Manipulating the intestinal microbiota can prevent alcohol-induced liver injury, positioning it as a new therapeutic target for ALD | |
Wolstenholme et al[29] | 2022 | Mice | Placebo vs FMT | Once | Mice in the FMT group reduced ethanol acceptance, intake, and preference | |
Philips et al[30] | 2017 | Human | Case report | 7 consecutive days | After FMT, clinical indicators, biochemical markers, and severity scores improved in SAH patients, with significant changes in intestinal microbiota observed | |
Philips et al[31] | 2017 | Human | Control vs FMT | 7 consecutive days | After FMT, there was a improvement in liver disease severity, an increase in survival rates, and notable changes in the composition of the intestinal microbiota | |
Philips et al[32] | 2018 | Human | Corticosteroids vs nutrition vs pentoxifylline vs FMT | 7 consecutive days | FMT showed a higher survival rate compared to other treatments for SAH, potentially serving as a cost-effective bridge to liver transplantation or improving survival without it | |
Philips et al[33] | 2022 | Human | Pentoxifylline vs FMT | 7 consecutive days | FMT improves 6-month survival and reduces liver-related complications, related to beneficial modulation of the gut microbiota | |
Philips et al[34] | 2022 | Human | SOC vs FMT | 7 consecutive days | FMT significantly reduces ascites, infections, encephalopathy, and alcohol relapse, with a trend toward higher survival, associated with beneficial modulation of the gut microbiota | |
Sharma et al[35] | 2022 | Human | SOC vs FMT | Once | FMT is safe and could improve short- and medium-term survival rates, and clinical severity scores in patients with SAH-ACLF | |
Pande et al[36] | 2023 | Human | Prednisolone vs FMT | 28 consecutive days | FMT is safe, improves 90-day survival, and reduces infections by positively modulating microbial communities | |
CHB | Ren et al[39] | 2017 | Human | Antiviral therapy vs antiviral therapy + FMT | Once every 4 weeks, until HBeAg clearance was achieved | In patients with sustained positive HBeAg after long-term antiviral therapy, FMT can reduce or even eliminate HBeAg levels |
Chauhan et al[40] | 2021 | Human | Antiviral therapy vs antiviral therapy + FMT | Once every 4 weeks for a total of six times | FMT is safe and effective in HBeAg clearance in HBeAg-positive CHB patients | |
PSC | Philips et al[43] | 2018 | Human | Case report | Once a week for a total of four times | After FMT, significant changes were observed in the liver biochemistry, bile acids, and the composition of the intestinal microbiota in PSC patients |
Allegretti et al[46] | 2019 | Human | Control vs FMT | Once | The improvement in ALP levels may be linked to an increase in the diversity of the intestinal microbiota, as well as the frequency of FMT | |
AIH | Liang et al[47] | 2021 | Mice | Control vs FMT | 28 consecutive days | FMT can alleviate liver injury and bacterial translocation, partially reverse the elevation of serum ALT and AST, restore the balance between follicular regulatory T and helper T cells in the spleen, and effectively correct the intestinal microbiota dysbiosis |
Cirrhosis/HE | Wang et al[51] | 2017 | Rat | Control vs probiotics vs low-dose FMT vs moderate-dose FMT vs high-dose FMT | 3 consecutive weeks | FMT prevents liver necrosis, improves behavioral performance, HE scores, and spatial learning ability in rats, enhances the expression of intestinal tight junction proteins, and repairs intestinal mucosal barrier damage. It also reduces the expression of TLR4 and TLR9 in the liver, along with a decrease in circulating pro-inflammatory factors (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF) |
Kao et al[52] | 2016 | Human | Case report | Once a week for 5 times | FMT can reverse intestinal microbiota dysbiosis and lead to the obvious improvement of cognitive function in dominant HE | |
Bajaj et al[53] | 2017 | Human | SOC vs FMT + SOC | Once | FMT can reduce the hospitalization rate, improve cognitive function, and restore intestinal microbiota dysbiosis | |
Bajaj et al[54] | 2019 | Human | SOC vs FMT + SOC | Once | Follow-up for more than one year demonstrated that the positive effects of FMT may be long-lasting | |
Bajaj et al[55] | 2019 | Human | Placebo capsules vs FMT capsules | 15 capsules | Oral FMT capsules are safe and well-tolerated. FMT is associated with improvements in duodenal mucosal diversity, intestinal microbiota dysbiosis, and AMP expression, along with a decrease in LBP levels and better performance in the brain App test | |
Bajaj et al[56] | 2019 | Human | Placebo capsules vs FMT capsules | 15 capsules | FMT has a beneficial effect on the intestinal microbiome function in patients with cirrhosis, leading to improvements in inflammation and cognitive performance. However, recipients with lower levels of secondary bile acids may experience poorer outcomes | |
Bloom et al[57] | 2022 | Human | Case report | 5 doses of 15 capsules within 3 weeks | FMT capsules improved cognitive performance in patients with HE, with the effect varying based on both donor and recipient factors | |
Mehta et al[59] | 2018 | Human | Case report | Once | FMT can significantly reduce arterial ammonia concentrations, alleviate neurological symptoms, and lower CTP and MELD scores in patients with HE | |
Li et al[60] | 2022 | Human | Case report | 3 times | FMT can improve liver function, relieve clinical symptoms, and significantly reduce the number of HE episodes in patients | |
Huang et al[61] | 2021 | Rat | Sham operation vs BDL vs BDL + FMT vs BDL + GMT | 5 consecutive days | FMT increased the abundance of Bifidobacterium and significantly reduced portal vein pressure | |
Bajaj et al[62] | 2018 | Human | SOC vs SOC + antibiotic + FMT | Once | FMT has also been shown to restore the diversity and function of the intestinal microbiota altered by antibiotics in patients with advanced cirrhosis who are treated with lactulose and rifaximin |
Table 2 Ongoing clinical trials of fecal microbiota transplantation in chronic liver diseases from Clinicaltrial.gov
Disease or condition | Study title | Study arms | Intervention | Primary outcomes measures | Clinical trials ID, country |
NAFLD, NASH | Fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis | Lean healthy donor frozen FMT | Efficacy (histological resolution of NASH defined as ballooning disappearance with or without persistence of minimal lobulillar inflammation and no progression of fibrosis stage) (time frame: 72 weeks) | NCT03803540, Spain | |
NAFLD | Effects of fecal microbiota transplantation on weight in obese patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease | Diet + exercise + FMT vs diet + exercise | 3 times IMT with 15-day intervals | Proportion of patients achieving ≤ 5% of the weight loss in kg from baseline (time frame: 3 months) | NCT04594954, India |
NAFLD | Dietary counseling coupled with FMT in the treatment of obesity and NAFLD-the DIFTOB study | Healthy diet counseling + FMT vs healthy diet counseling + placebo | A change in HOMA-IR (time frame: At week 12 and at week 52) | NCT05607745, Finland | |
NAFLD with history of diabetes melitus | A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study to characterize the intestinal microbiome and to evaluate the safety and fecal microbiome changes following administration of lyophilized PRIM-DJ2727 or placebo given orally for 12 weeks in subjects with NAFLD | Oral PRIM-DJ2727 vs oral placebo | twice weekly for 12 weeks | Microbiome diversity in fecal samples as indicated by the Shannon diversity index (time frame: 10 months) | NCT04371653 |
NASH | Evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of fecal microbiota transfer for the treatment of patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis | Capsules of FMT vs capsules of placebo | An initial dose of 24 oral capsules and a maintenance dose of 12 oral capsules every 3 months for 12 months | Proportion of patients with improvement of fat fraction by proton density by MRI and no worsening of activity or fibrosis (time frame: 72 weeks) | NCT05622526 |
NASH | Fecal microbiota therapy versus standard therapy in NASH related cirrhosis | FMT vs standard treatment care | Once a month for 5 months | Reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient in the two groups from baseline (time frame: 1 year) | NCT02721264, India |
Alcohol-related liver disease, alcohol use disorder, cirrhosis | Intestinal microbiota transplant in alcohol-associated chronic liver disease and cirrhosis | IMT capsules vs placebo capsules | Twice during the trial | Change in alcohol consumption (time frame: Baseline to 3 months after treatment) | NCT05548452, United States |
Liver disease, alcohol dependence, HE and etc. | Safety and efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation | FMT | The efficacy of FMT in treating dysbiosis-associated disorder will be assessed by number of patients who have improvement in clinical symptoms (depends on each disease as stated in outcome) (time frame: 1 year) | NCT04014413, HongKong, China | |
SAH | A comparison of fecal microbiota transplantation and steroid therapy in patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis | FMT vs steroids | 7 days | Proportion of participants with overall survival at 3 months (time frame: 3 months) | NCT03091010, India |
SAH | Fecal microbiota transplantation in severe alcoholic hepatitis- assessment of impact on prognosis and short-term outcome | FMT vs standard of care treatment | 1 time | Survival (time frame: 3 months) | NCT03827772, India |
AH | Fecal microbiota therapy in steroid ineligible alcoholic hepatitis | FMT vs standard medical treatment | 7 times | Mortality at 3 months (time frame: 3 months), liver transplant free survival (time frame: 3 months) | NCT05285592, India |
AH | Safety evaluation of fecal microbiota transplantation in severe alcoholic hepatitis | Standard of care + oral PRIM-DJ2727 vs oral placebo | Every day for a week followed by once weekly for 3 weeks | To assess survival in patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis receiving PRIM-DJ2727 capsules in comparison to standard of care (time frame: Day 1 to 12 months) | NCT05006430, United States |
CHB | Study on effect of intestinal microbiota transplantation in chronic hepatitis B | IMT + antiviral therapy vs antiviral therapy | 6 times IMT with 2-week intervals | Change of serum HBeAg level (Time Frame: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months) | NCT03429439, China |
HBV induced cirrhosis | Study on effect of intestinal microbiota transplantation in hepatitis B virus induced cirrhosis | Intestinal microbiota transplantation | 4 times IMT with 2-week intervals | Change of liver Fibroscan score (time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months) | NCT03437876, China |
Acute-on-chronic liver failure, hepatitis B | Efficacy of addition of FMT and plasma exchange to tenofovir in comparison to monotherapy with tenofovir in ACLF-HBV | Plasma exchange + tenofovir + FMT vs tenofovir | 7 days | Overall survival in both groups (time frame: Day 28) | NCT04431375, India |
Decompensated cirrhosis | Fecal microbiota transplantation for decompensated cirrhosis | FMT + traditional treatment vs traditional treatment | Number of adverse events complication rate in all patients in both groups (time frame: 3 months) | NCT03014505, Chian | |
Cirrhosis, liver | Fecal microbiota transplantation in cirrhosis | FMT vs control | Blood ammonia, ALT, AST, gut microbiome, albumin, blood glucose, serum creatinine, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, prothrombin time activity percentage and liver stiffness (time frame: Change from baseline, at 12 months) | NCT04591522 | |
Cirrhosis of the liver | Trial of faecal microbiota transplantation in cirrhosis | FMT vs placebo | Assessment of the feasibility of FMT (time frame: 18 months) | NCT02862249, United Kingdom | |
Liver cirrhosis | Faecal microbiota transplantation for liver cirrhosis | FMT vs placebo | 3 times | Time to death or readmission due to episode of acute decompensation in FMT treated vs placebo treated patients (Time Frame: 1 year) | NCT04932577, Denmark |
Cirrhosis, HE | FMT in cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy | Dual oral and rectal FMT vs oral FMT and rectal placebo vs oral placebo and rectal FMT vs oral and rectal placebo | Adverse events related to FMT (time frame: 6 months), change in microbial diversity in stool (time frame: 6 months) | NCT03796598, United States | |
HE | Fecal microbiota transplant as treatment of hepatic encephalopathy | FMT oral capsules vs placebo oral capsule | days 1, 2, 7, 14, and 21 | PHES [time frame: Before the first administration of FMT (day 0) and one week after the last administration of FMT (day 28)] | NCT03420482, United States |
HE | Efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplant for secondary prophylaxis of hepatic encephalopathy | FMT + standard medical therapy vs standard medical therapy | 3 times | Proportion of patients developing an episode of hepatic encephalopathy within 6 months (time frame: 6 months) | NCT05229289, India |
- Citation: Ma L, Zhang MH, Xu YF, Hao YX, Niu XX, Li Y, Xing HC. Fecal microbiota transplantation: A promising treatment strategy for chronic liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(28): 105089
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i28/105089.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i28.105089