Editorial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2024; 30(38): 4168-4174
Published online Oct 14, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i38.4168
Table 1 Risk factors of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma
Squamous cell carcinoma
Adenocarcinoma
Male genderMale gender
AlcoholTobacco smoking
Tobacco smokingObesity (BMI > 25 kg/m2)
HPV infectionBarrett’s esophagus
Low intake of fruits and vegetablesGERD
Consumption of hot beverages, pickled vegetables, processed and red meatLow intake of fruits and vegetables
Consumption of processed and red meat
Low socioeconomic statusHigh socioeconomic status
Genetic factors: Howel-Evans syndrome, Fanconi anemia, Bloom syndromeGenetic factors: Familial Barrett’s esophagus
Table 2 Summary of meta-analyses regarding the association between Helicobacter pylori infection and esophageal cancer
Authors
Year of publication
Number of studies
Association of H. pylori infection with ESCC
Association of H. pylori infection with EAC
Gao et al[19]201935No significant association in the general population: OR 0.84 (95%CI: 0.64-1.09)/OR 0.74 (95%CI: 0.54-0.97); Inverse relationship in the Middle Eastern population: OR: 0.34 (95%CI: 0.22-0.52 or 0.26-0.44); Positive association with the North American population: OR: 1.83 (95%CI: 1.17-2.87)Inverse relationship: OR 0.55 (95%CI: 0.43-0.70)/OR 0.23 (95%CI: 0.15-0.36)
Nie et al[20]201428No significant association with the general population: OR 1.16 (95%CI: 0.83-1.60); Inverse association with Asian population: OR 0.74 (95%CI: 0.57–0.97); Positive association with non-Asian population: OR 1.41 (95%CI: 1.02–1.94)Inverse relationship: OR 0.57 (95%CI: 0.44-0.73)
Xie et al[21]201327No significant association in the general population: OR 0.83 (95%CI: 0.63-1.03); Inverse relationship with the East Asian population: OR 0.66 (95%CI: 0.43-0.89)Inverse relationship: OR 0.59 (95%CI: 0.51-0.68)
Islami and Kamangar[22]200819No significant association: OR 1.10 (95%CI: 0.78-1.55)Inverse relationship: OR 0.56 (95%CI: 0.46-0.68)
Zhuo et al[23]2008195No significant association: OR 0.80 (95%CI: 0.45-1.43), Z = 0.75, P > 0.05Inverse relationship: OR 0.58 (95%CI: 0.48-0.70), Z = 5.79, P < 0.01
Rokkas et al[24]200772No significant association: OR 0.85 (95%CI: 0.55-1.33), P = 0.48Inverse relationship: OR 0.52 (95%CI: 0.37-0.73), P < 0.001
Table 3 Mechanisms underlying the protective role of Helicobacter pylori infection against esophageal adenocarcinoma
Mechanism
Description
Implications
Development of atrophic gastritisThe inflammatory processes in chronic H. pylori infection can cause gastric atrophy by loss of gastric glands and partial replacement by intestinal epithelium. This reduces the number of parietal cells which secrete hydrochloric acid, the main constituent of gastric acidLower gastric acidity reduces the risk of GERD and BE, risk factors for EAC
Alteration of plasma ghrelin levelsH. pylori-induced gastric atrophy leads to reduced gastric ghrelin production, subsequently decreasing plasma ghrelin levels. Contrastingly, eradication of H. pylori increases ghrelin levels, thus leading to obesity. Thus, H. pylori infection is inversely related to obesityGhrelin is a key regulator of obesity and has been implicated in the pathogenesis and differentiation of esophageal cancers. Obesity can predispose individuals to GERD, which is a risk factor for both BE and EAC
Induction of cancer cell apoptosisIn vitro, H. pylori induces apoptosis in Barrett’s-derived EAC cells at a higher rate than in healthy esophageal cells. H. pylori activates the Fas-caspase cascade by increasing Fas protein expression in EAC cells, which leads to apoptosis through the fragmentation of cellular DNAH. pylori infection can induce apoptosis and thus reduce the rate of esophageal cancer progression