Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2022; 28(28): 3586-3594
Published online Jul 28, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i28.3586
Published online Jul 28, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i28.3586
Table 1 Comparison of liver biopsy methods1
| Percutaneous liver biopsy | Transjugular liver biopsy | Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy | |
| Most common form of anesthesia | Local | Moderate sedation | Moderate sedation, deep sedation |
| Imaging | Fluoroscopy, ultrasound | Fluoroscopy | Ultrasound |
| Capsular puncture | Yes | No | Yes |
| Ability to evaluate focal hepatic lesions | No | No | Yes |
| Liver lobe access | Right | Right | Right, left |
| Contraindications | INR > 1.5, body habitus, significant ascites | Venous thrombosis, cholangitis | INR > 1.5 |
| Post-procedural pain | +++ | + | + |
| Post-procedural minor bleeding | + | + | + |
| Adverse event rate | + | + | + |
| Post-procedural recovery time | +++ | ++ | + |
| Specimen length | + | + | +++ |
| Total complete portal tracts | + | ++ | +++ |
| Procedure cost | + | ++ | +++ |
| Institutional availability | +++ | ++ | + |
- Citation: Rangwani S, Ardeshna DR, Mumtaz K, Kelly SG, Han SY, Krishna SG. Update on endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(28): 3586-3594
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i28/3586.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i28.3586
