Wu YL, Kumar R, Wang MF, Singh M, Huang JF, Zhu YY, Lin S. Validation of conventional non-invasive fibrosis scoring systems in patients with metabolic associated fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27(34): 5753-5763 [PMID: 34629799 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i34.5753]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Su Lin, MD, PhD, Associate Chief Physician, Professor, Department of Hepatology, Hepatology Research Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 20 Chazhong Road, Taijiang District, Fuzhou 350005, Fujian Province, China. sumer5129@fjmu.edu.cn
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Table 3 Comparison of the diagnostic value among fibrosis-4 index, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score, aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index, and body mass index, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase ratio, diabetes score in metabolic associated fatty liver disease
Table 4 Comparison of the diagnostic value among fibrosis-4 index, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score, aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index, and body mass index, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase ratio, diabetes score in hepatitis B virus-metabolic associated fatty liver disease (group A) and pure metabolic associated fatty liver disease (group B) subgroups
Cutoffs
AUROC
Accuracy, %
Sensitivity, %
Specificity, %
PPV, %
NPV, %
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
FIB-4
1.05
0.738
0.658
67.7
56.9
74.8
55.6
62.7
57.1
58.2
19.2
78.2
87.5
1.30
68.2
67.2
58.5
44.4
75.0
71.4
61.9
22.2
72.3
87.5
1.45
68.5
70.7
54.4
22.2
78.3
79.6
63.5
16.7
71.2
84.8
2.67
63.2
84.5
17.0
22.2
95.3
95.9
71.4
50.0
62.3
87.0
3.25
63.5
86.2
13.6
22.2
98.1
98.0
83.3
66.7
62.1
87.3
NFS
-2.100
0.725
0.692
68.2
67.2
70.1
77.8
67.0
65.3
59.5
29.2
76.3
94.1
-1.455
64.9
74.1
44.2
55.6
79.2
77.6
59.6
31.3
67.2
90.5
0.676
60.4
84.5
4.1
11.1
99.5
98.0
85.7
50.0
59.9
85.7
APRI
0.42
0.671
0.633
59.3
51.7
81.6
77.8
43.9
46.9
50.2
21.2
77.5
92.0
0.50
60.2
55.2
70.7
77.8
52.8
51.0
51.0
22.6
72.3
92.6
1.50
61.0
77.6
23.1
11.1
87.3
89.8
55.7
16.7
62.1
84.6
BARD
2
0.609
0.644
63.0
74.1
42.2
33.3
77.4
81.6
56.4
25.0
65.9
87.0
Citation: Wu YL, Kumar R, Wang MF, Singh M, Huang JF, Zhu YY, Lin S. Validation of conventional non-invasive fibrosis scoring systems in patients with metabolic associated fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27(34): 5753-5763