Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 21, 2021; 27(31): 5232-5246
Published online Aug 21, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i31.5232
Published online Aug 21, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i31.5232
Table 1 Performance of lesion detection and localization
Lesions | Sensitivity, % | Specificity, % | PPV, % | NPV, % | |
Overall | 1412 | 95.0 (93.7-96.0) | 99.1 (98.9-99.3) | 93.7 (92.3-94.9) | 99.3 (99.1-99.4) |
Pathology | |||||
Non-adenomatous polyps | 487 | 93.4 (90.8-95.4) | 99.1 (98.9-99.3) | 83.5 (80.0-86.5) | 99.7 (99.5-99.8) |
Adenomatous polyps | 640 | 95.2 (93.1-96.6) | 99.1 (98.9-99.3) | 87.1 (84.4-89.5) | 99.7 (99.5-99.8) |
Adenocarcinomas | 285 | 97.2 (94.3-98.7) | 99.1 (98.9-99.3) | 75.5 (70.7-79.7) | 99.9 (99.8-100.0) |
Size | |||||
≤ 5 mm | 713 | 94.1 (92.1-95.7) | 99.1 (98.9-99.3) | 88.2 (85.6-95.3) | 99.6 (99.4-99.7) |
6-9 mm | 396 | 95.2 (92.5-97.0) | 99.1 (98.9-99.3) | 80.7 (76.8-84.1) | 99.8 (99.7-99.9) |
≥ 10 mm | 303 | 96.7 (93.8-98.3) | 99.1 (98.9-99.3) | 76.5 (71.9-80.6) | 99.9 (99.8-99.9) |
Paris classification | |||||
Ip | 180 | 96.0 (91.8-98.3) | 99.1 (98.9-99.3) | 65.8 (59.7-71.4) | 99.9 (99.8-1.00) |
Is | 581 | 96.1 (94.0-97.4) | 99.1 (98.9-99.3) | 86.1 (83.2-88.6) | 99.8 (99.6-99.8) |
IIa | 525 | 92.6 (89.9-94.6) | 99.1 (98.9-99.3) | 84.4 (81.1-87.2) | 99.6 (99.5-99.7) |
IIb | 30 | 100.0 (85.9-100.0) | 99.1 (98.9-99.3) | 25.0 (17.7-33.9) | 100.0 (99.9-100.0) |
IIc | 2 | 100.0 (19.8-100.0) | 99.1 (98.9-99.3) | 2.2 (0.4-8.4) | 100.0 (99.9-100.0) |
III | 32 | 96.9 (82.0-99.8) | 99.1 (98.9-99.3) | 25.6 (18.3-34.5) | 100.0 (99.9-100.0) |
Unclassified | 62 | 96.8 (87.8-99.4) | 99.1 (98.9-99.3) | 40.0 (32.2-48.3) | 100.0 (99.9-100.0) |
Table 2 Potential causes of false negatives and false positives
Causes of false negatives | No. of images, n (%) | Causes of false positives1 | No. of images, n (%) |
Test dataset | |||
Fecal fluid/bubble | 17 (24) | Folds | 18 (19) |
Reflections of light | 15 (21) | Reflections of light | 17 (18) |
Difficult angle | 13 (19) | Fecal fluid/bubble | 16 (17) |
Shadow | 8 (11) | Colonic valve | 11 (12) |
Fuzzy image | 6 (9) | Ileocecal valve | 7 (7) |
Color of background | 2 (3) | Fuzzy image | 5 (5) |
Far distance | 2 (3) | Others2 | 11 (12) |
Unclassified | 7 (10) | Unclassified | 10 (11) |
Validation in clinical colonoscopy | |||
Shadow | 1 (33.3) | Folds3 | 276 (59.0) |
Difficult angle | 1 (33.3) | Reflections of light | 89 (19.0) |
Depressed lesion | 1 (33.3) | Fecal fluid/bubble | 43 (9.2) |
Normal structures4 | 46 (9.8) | ||
Other lesions5 | 14 (3.0) |
Table 3 Polyp detection between colonoscopists and colonoscopists + computer-assisted detection
Colonoscopists | Colonoscopists + CADe | P value | |||
PDR, % | 45.9 | 48.3 | 0.06 | ||
SSR, % | 3.83 | 4.78 | 0.50 | ||
CRSR, % | 9.09 | 11.5 | 0.06 | ||
Number of polyps, mean ± SD | 0.82 ± 1.20 | 0.90 ± 1.25 | < 0.001 | ||
Pathology | |||||
Non-adenomatous | 0.52 ± 0.94 | 0.58 ± 1.00 | 0.01 | ||
Adenomatous | 0.30 ± 0.62 | 0.32 ± 0.64 | 0.025 | ||
Age | |||||
< 50 | 0.45 ± 0.70 | 0.51 ± 0.77 | 0.03 | ||
≥ 50 | 1.12 ± 1.42 | 1.22 ± 1.47 | 0.002 | ||
Sex | |||||
Male | 0.96 ± 1.28 | 1.05 ± 1.36 | 0.005 | ||
Female | 0.66 ± 1.07 | 0.72 ± 1.11 | 0.01 | ||
Location | |||||
Proximal | 0.35 ± 0.69 | 0.39 ± 0.76 | 0.01 | ||
Distal | 0.46 ± 0.89 | 0.51 ± 0.90 | 0.003 | ||
Size | |||||
≥ 10 mm | 0.06 ± 0.28 | 0.06 ± 0.28 | 1 | ||
6-9 mm | 0.18 ± 0.52 | 0.19 ± 0.52 | 0.32 | ||
≤ 5 mm | 0.57 ± 0.95 | 0.65 ± 1.00 | < 0.001 | ||
Morphology | |||||
Flat | 0.67 ± 1.03 | 0.74 ± 1.08 | 0.001 | ||
Subpedunculated | 0.11 ± 0.42 | 0.12 ± 0.42 | 0.16 | ||
Pedunculated | 0.03 ± 0.21 | 0.03 ± 0.21 | 1 | ||
Indications | |||||
Screening | 0.76 ± 1.15 | 0.85 ± 1.21 | 0.03 | ||
Surveillance | 1.19 ± 1.42 | 1.33 ± 1.53 | 0.03 | ||
Diagnosis | 0.70 ± 1.10 | 0.75 ± 1.13 | 0.03 | ||
Colonoscopes | |||||
CF-Q290 | 0.78 ± 1.09 | 0.87 ± 1.17 | < 0.001 | ||
CF-Q260 | 1.04 ± 1.58 | 1.15 ± 1.56 | 0.08 | ||
CF-Q240 | 0.83 ± 1.64 | 0.83 ± 1.64 | 1 | ||
Experience | |||||
> 3000 | 1.24 ± 1.48 | 1.24 ± 1.48 | 1 | ||
1000-3000 | 0.79 ± 1.16 | 0.91 ± 1.26 | 0.003 | ||
< 1000 | 0.54 ± 0.92 | 0.62 ± 0.99 | 0.03 | ||
BBPS | |||||
< 6 | 0.59 ± 1.19 | 0.62 ± 1.19 | 0.32 | ||
≥ 6 | 0.87 ± 1.19 | 0.96 ± 1.26 | < 0.001 | ||
Withdrawal time | |||||
< 6 min | 0.52 ± 0.97 | 0.54 ± 0.98 | 0.16 | ||
≥ 6 min | 1.13 ± 1.33 | 1.27 ± 1.39 | 0.001 |
Table 4 Adenoma detection between colonoscopists and colonoscopists + computer-assisted detection
Colonoscopists | Colonoscopists + CADe | P value | |||
ADR, % | 22.0 | 23.9 | 0.13 | ||
Number of adenomas, mean ± SD | |||||
0.30 ± 0.62 | 0.32 ± 0.64 | 0.025 | |||
Age | |||||
< 50 | 0.14 ± 0.40 | 0.15 ± 0.41 | 0.32 | ||
≥ 50 | 0.43 ± 0.67 | 0.46 ± 0.69 | 0.045 | ||
Sex | |||||
Male | 0.38 ± 0.70 | 0.41 ± 0.73 | 0.045 | ||
Female | 0.21 ± 0.48 | 0.22 ± 0.48 | 0.32 | ||
Location | |||||
Proximal | 0.12 ± 0.38 | 0.13 ± 0.39 | 0.16 | ||
Distal | 0.17 ± 0.46 | 0.19 ± 0.47 | 0.08 | ||
Size | |||||
≥ 10 mm | 0.06 ± 0.28 | 0.06 ± 0.28 | 1 | ||
6-9 mm | 0.11 ± 0.36 | 0.11 ± 0.36 | 1 | ||
≤ 5 mm | 0.12 ± 0.38 | 0.15 ± 0.42 | 0.025 | ||
Morphology | |||||
Flat | 0.20 ± 0.47 | 0.21 ± 0.50 | 0.045 | ||
Subpedunculated | 0.07 ± 0.27 | 0.07 ± 0.28 | 0.32 | ||
Pedunculated | 0.03 ± 0.21 | 0.03 ± 0.21 | 1 | ||
Indications | |||||
Screening | 0.29 ± 0.65 | 0.33 ± 0.66 | 0.08 | ||
Surveillance | 0.43 ± 0.67 | 0.45 ± 0.67 | 0.32 | ||
Diagnosis | 0.25 ± 0.56 | 0.26 ± 0.59 | 0.32 | ||
Colonoscopes | |||||
CF-Q290 | 0.31 ± 0.63 | 0.34 ± 0.65 | 0.025 | ||
CF-Q260 | 0.23 ± 0.51 | 0.23 ± 0.51 | 1 | ||
CF-Q240 | 0.25 ± 0.62 | 0.25 ± 0.62 | 1 | ||
Experience | |||||
> 3000 | 0.5 ± 0.72 | 0.5 ± 0.72 | 1 | ||
1000-3000 | 0.24 ± 0.59 | 0.27 ± 0.60 | 0.08 | ||
< 1000 | 0.23 ± 0.53 | 0.26 ± 0.60 | 0.16 | ||
BBPS | |||||
< 6 | 0.19 ± 0.46 | 0.19 ± 0.46 | 1 | ||
≥ 6 | 0.32 ± 0.64 | 0.35 ± 0.66 | 0.025 | ||
Withdrawal time | |||||
< 6 min | 0.22 ± 0.57 | 0.22 ± 0.60 | 0.32 | ||
≥ 6 min | 0.38 ± 0.65 | 0.42 ± 0.65 | 0.045 |
- Citation: Zhao SB, Yang W, Wang SL, Pan P, Wang RD, Chang X, Sun ZQ, Fu XH, Shang H, Wu JR, Chen LZ, Chang J, Song P, Miao YL, He SX, Miao L, Jiang HQ, Wang W, Yang X, Dong YH, Lin H, Chen Y, Gao J, Meng QQ, Jin ZD, Li ZS, Bai Y. Establishment and validation of a computer-assisted colonic polyp localization system based on deep learning. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27(31): 5232-5246
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v27/i31/5232.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i31.5232