Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2020; 26(22): 3012-3023
Published online Jun 14, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i22.3012
Published online Jun 14, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i22.3012
Refereces | Group | n | CRM+(%) | IOP(%) | Local recurr-ence(%) | Post-operative complications | QoL scores | |||||
Authors | Year | Type | Perineal wound compli-cations (%) | Urinary retention(%) | Sexual dysfunc-tion (%) | Chronic perineal pain (%) | ||||||
West et al[11] | 2010 | Retro case-control | ELAPE/APR | 176/124 | 20.3/49.6, P < 0.001 | 8.2/28.3, P < 0.001 | - | 38/20, P = 0.019 | 46/17, P = 0.579 | 46/33, P = 0.192 | - | - |
Han et al[13] | 2012 | RCT | ELAPE/APR | 35/32 | 5.7/28.1 | 5.7/15.6, P = 0.246 | 2.8/18.8, P = 0.048 | 37.1/31.3 P = 0.612 | 40/28.1, P = 0.307 | 74/60, P = 0.306 | 51.4/6.3, P < 0.001 | - |
Asplund et al[17] | 2012 | Retro case-control | ELAPE/APR | 79/79 | 17/20, P = 0.647 | 13/10, P > 0.05 | 9/9, P = 1 | 46/28, P < 0.05 | - | - | - | - |
Vaughan-Shaw et al[58] | 2012 | Pro case-control | ELAPE/LAPR/OAPR | 16/10/10 | 0/1/2, P > 0.05 | 0/0/1, P > 0.05 | - | 2/5/2, P = 0.21 | 3/2/2, P = 0.99 | - | - | 85.4/77.5/78.5, P > 0.05 |
Ortiz et al[66] | 2014 | Retro case-control | ELAPE/APR | 457/457 | 13.6/13.1, P > 0.846 | 7.7/7,9, P > 0.902 | 5.6/2.7, P > 0.664 | 21.9/26, P > 0.141 | - | - | - | - |
Shen et al[55] | 2015 | Pro case-control | ELAPE/APR | 36/33 | 4/12, P = 0.297 | 5.6/21.2, P = 0.028 | 0/15.2, P < 034 | 8.3/27.3, P = 0.039 | 11.1/3, P = 0.359 | 11.8/36.4, P = 0.127 | - | P > 0.05 |
Wang et al[57] | 2015 | Retro case-control | ELAPE/APR | 23/25 | 4.3/28, P = 0.028 | 0/20, P = 0.023 | 8.7/32, P = 0.047 | 39.1/24, P = 0.259 | 26.1/12, P = 0.212 | 60/37.5, P = 0.210 | 47.8/8, P = 0.002 | P > 0.05 |
Klein et al[19] | 2015 | Retro case-control | ELAPE/APR | 301/253 | 16/7, P = 0.001 | 2/3, P = 0.373 | - | 14/10, P = 0.143 | - | - | - | - |
Prytz et al[67] | 2016 | Pro case-control | ELAPE/APR | 518/209 | 41.5/38.4, P < 0.0001 | P < 0.001 | P < 0.001 | P < 0.001 | - | - | - | - |
Stelzner et al[16] | 2016 | Pro case-control | ELAPE/APR | 36/36 | 2.9/2.8, P = 1 | 0/16.7, P = 0.025 | 5.9/18.2, P = 0.153 | 16.7/36.1, P = 0.061 | - | - | - | - |
Kamali et al[54] | 2017 | Pro case-control | ELAPE/APR | 27/21 | 7.4/9.5, P = 0.50 | - | 3.7/4.7, P = 1 | 37/24, P > 0.05 | - | - | - | 77.3/65.3, P = 0.27 |
Habr-Gama et al[12] | 2017 | Retro case-control | ELAPE/APR | 22/50 | 13.6/16.6, P = 0.70 | 0/8, P = 0.30 | 4.5/28.6, P = 0.01 | 22.7/46, P = 0.007 | - | - | - | - |
Carpelan et al[18] | 2018 | Retro case-control | ELAPE/APR | 42/27 | 24/41, P = 0.136 | 10/22, P = 0.134 | 7/19, P = 0.247 | 45/30, P = 195 | - | - | 5/4, P > 0.05 | - |
Shen et al[15] | 2019 | Retro case-control | ELAPE/APR | 106/88 | 4.2/6.5, P > 0.05 | - | 3.8/11.25, P = 0.027 | 17.0/14.8, P = 0.699 | 7.5/3.4, P = 0.353 | - | - | - |
- Citation: Tao Y, Han JG, Wang ZJ. Extralevator abdominoperineal excision for advanced low rectal cancer: Where to go. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(22): 3012-3023
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v26/i22/3012.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i22.3012