Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2020; 26(20): 2657-2668
Published online May 28, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i20.2657
Published online May 28, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i20.2657
Table 1 Differences in terms of perfusion parameters in the healthy rectal wall and the tumor tissue, determines through the dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging study for staging rectal cancer (MR1)
DCE-MRI parameters | Healthy rectal wall | Rectal tumor | P value |
RAE (mean ± SD) | 57.5 ± 41.5 | 100 ± 38 | 0.005 |
RVE (mean ± SD) | 75.5 ± 43 | 119.5 ± 26.5 | 0.005 |
RLE (mean ± SD) | 82 ± 38.5 | 114 ± 22.5 | 0.005 |
ME (mean ± SD) | 807 ± 227.5 | 1143.5 ± 348 | 0.004 |
TTP (mean ± SD) | 217 ± 79 | 185 ± 41 | 0.040 |
AUC (mean ± SD) | 114388.5 ± 46237.5 | 186197 ± 41042.5 | 0.005 |
Table 2 Differences in terms of perfusion parameters between responders and non-responders, in the healthy rectal wall, determines through a dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging study during staging (MR1) and restaging (MR2) of rectal cancer after chemo-radiotherapy
DCE-MRI parameters | Responders | Non-responders | ||||
MR1 | MR2 | P value | MR1 | MR2 | P value | |
RAE (mean ± SD) | 62 ± 33 | 51 ± 8 | 0.77 | 53 ± 50 | 63 ± 33 | 0.47 |
RVE (mean ± SD) | 70 ± 40 | 60 ± 14 | 0.73 | 81 ± 46 | 69 ± 42 | 0.68 |
RLE (mean ± SD) | 72 ± 35 | 76 ± 10 | 0.49 | 92 ± 42 | 63 ± 52 | 0.61 |
ME (mean ± SD) | 662 ± 98 | 882 ± 251 | 0.11 | 952 ± 357 | 847 ± 358 | 0.87 |
TTP (mean ± SD) | 230 ± 61 | 223 ± 32 | 0.64 | 204 ± 97 | 151 ± 56 | 0.05 |
AUC (mean ± SD) | 120261 ± 46709 | 114347 ± 32930 | 0.74 | 108516 ± 45766 | 114187 ± 28584 | 0.99 |
Table 3 Differences in terms of perfusion parameters between responders and non-responders, in the tumor tissue, determines through a dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging study for staging rectal cancer (MR1)
DCE-MRI Parameters | Responders | Non-responders | P value |
RAE (mean ± SD) | 115 ± 21 | 85 ± 55 | 0.27 |
RVE (mean ± SD) | 119 ± 21 | 120 ± 32 | 0.94 |
RLE (mean ± SD) | 111 ± 14 | 117 ± 31 | 0.72 |
ME (mean ± SD) | 1060 ± 325 | 1227 ± 371 | 0.52 |
TTP (mean ± SD) | 196 ± 12 | 175 ± 70 | 0.51 |
AUC (mean ± SD) | 203361 ± 14347 | 169033 ± 67738 | 0.28 |
Table 4 Differences in terms of perfusion parameters between responders and non-responders in the tumor tissue, determines through a dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging study for rectal cancer restaging (MR2) after chemo-radiotherapy
DCE-MRI parameters | Responders | Non-responders | P value |
RAE (mean ± SD) | 54 ± 20 | 129 ± 45 | 0.02 |
RVE (mean ± SD) | 73 ± 24 | 154 ± 39 | < 0.05 |
RLE (mean ± SD) | 82 ± 29 | 164 ± 35 | < 0.05 |
ME (mean ± SD) | 904 ± 429 | 1714 ± 427 | 0.03 |
TTP (mean ± SD) | 218 ± 18 | 196 ± 23 | 0.15 |
AUC (mean ± SD) | 120894 ± 50495 | 258022 ± 86469 | 0.02 |
- Citation: Ippolito D, Drago SG, Pecorelli A, Maino C, Querques G, Mariani I, Franzesi CT, Sironi S. Role of dynamic perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in patients with local advanced rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(20): 2657-2668
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v26/i20/2657.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i20.2657