Lin JX, Xie XS, Weng XF, Zheng CH, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lu J, Chen QY, Cao LL, Lin M, Tu RH, Li P, Huang CM. Low expression of CDK5RAP3 and DDRGK1 indicates a poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(34): 3898-3907 [PMID: 30228783 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i34.3898]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Chang-Ming Huang, MD, Doctor, Professor, Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian Province, China. hcmlr2002@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Basic Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 14, 2018; 24(34): 3898-3907 Published online Sep 14, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i34.3898
Table 1 Relationship between CDK5RAP3 and DDRGK1 protein expression in gastric cancer tissues and various clinicopathological variables
Variables
Total
CDK5RAP3 expression
DDRGK1 expression
Low
High
χ2
P value
Low
High
χ2
P value
Gender
1.659
0.198
3.057
0.080
Male
107
84
23
74
33
Female
28
25
3
24
4
Age (yr)
4.441
0.035
0.719
0.397
> 60
91
78
13
64
27
≤ 60
44
31
13
34
10
Tumor size(cm)
0.125
0.723
0.043
0.835
> 5
53
42
11
39
14
≤ 5
72
67
15
59
23
Location of tumor
3.860
0.277
1.537
0.674
Lower 1/3
55
48
7
37
18
Middle 1/3
20
15
5
16
4
Upper 1/3
45
36
9
34
11
More than 1/3
15
10
5
11
4
Borrmann type
0.285
0.593
1.312
0.252
I + II Type
31
24
7
25
6
III + IV Type
104
85
19
73
31
Degree of differentiation
0.187
0.666
4.414
0.036
Well/moderate
57
47
10
36
21
Poor and not
78
62
16
62
16
Histological type
1.271
0.736
8.547
0.036
Papillary
58
48
10
39
19
Tubular
42
32
10
27
15
Mucinous
10
9
1
9
1
Signet-ring cell
25
20
5
23
2
Depth of invasion
5.674
0.017
1.428
0.232
T1 + T2
21
13
8
13
8
T3 + T4
114
96
18
85
29
Lymph node metastasis
0.008
0.927
6.023
0.014
Negative
20
16
4
10
10
Positive
115
93
22
88
27
TNM stage
1.383
0.240
2.632
0.105
I + II
44
33
11
28
16
III + IV
91
76
15
70
21
Distant metastasis
1.761
0.184
0.639
0.424
Negative
128
102
26
92
36
Positive
7
7
0
6
1
Table 2 Relationship between different CDK5RAP3 and DDRGK1 protein expression status in gastric cancer tissues and various clinicopathological variables
Variables
Total
C53 and DDRGK1 low expression
C53 and/or DDRGK1 high expression
χ2
P value
Gender
Male
107
59
48
5.077
0.024
Female
28
22
6
Age (yr)
> 60
91
55
36
0.022
0.881
≤ 60
44
26
18
Tumor size (cm)
> 5
53
32
21
0.005
0.943
≤ 5
82
49
33
Location of tumor
Lower 1/3
55
33
22
1.481
0.687
Middle 1/3
20
12
8
Upper 1/3
45
29
16
More than 1/3
15
7
8
Borrmann type
I + II Type
31
20
11
0.342
0.559
III + IV Type
104
61
43
Degree of differentiation
Well/moderate
57
31
26
1.296
0.255
Poor and not
78
50
28
Histological type
Papillary
57
33
25
4.415
0.220
Tubular
42
22
20
Mucinous
10
8
2
Signet-ring cell
25
18
7
Depth of invasion
T1 + T2
21
8
13
4.972
0.026
T3 + T4
114
73
41
Lymph node metastasis
Negative
20
8
12
3.913
0.048
Positive
115
73
42
TNM stage
I + II
44
20
24
5.754
0.016
III + IV
91
61
30
Distant metastasis
Negative
126
75
53
2.034
0.154
Positive
7
6
1
Table 3 Univariate analysis of the correlation between clinicopathological parameters and survival of patients with gastric cancer
Clinicopathological parameters
Three-year cumulative survival rate
Log-rank test
P value
Gender
Male
75.4
0.395
0.53
Female
71.4
Age (yr)
> 60
75.4
0.163
0.686
≤ 60
73.8
Tumor size (cm)
> 5
68.3
0.988
0.32
≤ 5
79.3
Location of tumor
Lower 1/3
78.2
3.438
0.329
Middle 1/3
83.6
Upper 1/3
63.3
More than 1/3
86.7
Borrmann type
I + II
76.9
0.373
0.541
III + IV
74
Degree of differentiation
Well/moderate
75.5
0.111
0.739
Poor and not
74.2
Histological type
Papillary
70
4.386
0.223
Tubular
85.6
Mucinous
70
Signet-ring cell
69.1
Depth of invasion
T1 + T2
91.7
4.95
0.026
T3 + T4
71.7
Lymph node metastasis
Negative
95
4.629
0.031
Positive
71.2
TNM stage
I + II
92.3
11.424
0.001
III + IV
66.3
Distant metastasis
Negative
76.7
8.015
0.005
Positive
42.9
CDK5RAP3 expression
Low
71.1
5.168
0.023
High
90.8
DDRGK1 expression
Low
67.7
5.971
0.015
High
91.9
CDK5RAP3/DDRGK1 expression
CDK5RAP3 and/or DDRGK1 high
90.1
10.415
0.001
CDK5RAP3 and DDRGK1 low
64.2
Table 4 Multivariate analysis of the correlation between clinicopathological parameters and survival time of patients with gastric cancer
Covariates
Coefficient
Standard error
HR
95%CI for HR
P value
CDK5RAP3 expression (high vs low)
-1.226
0.735
0.294
0.070-1.239
0.095
DDRGK1 expression (high vs. low)
-0.979
0.536
0.376
0.131-1.074
0.068
CDK5RAP3 and DDRGK1 expression (low/low vs. high and/or high)
1.178
0.453
3.247
1.336-7.891
0.009
Depth of invasion (T3,T4 vs T1,T2)
1.071
1.045
2.920
0.376-22.635
0.305
Lymph node metastasis (positive vs negative)
1.538
1.020
1.974
0.631-34.367
0.132
Distant metastasis (positive vs negative)
0.861
0.544
2.365
0.815-6.8631
0.113
TNM stage (stage III and IV vs I and II)
-1.630
0.608
7.195
0.060-0.645
0.007
Citation: Lin JX, Xie XS, Weng XF, Zheng CH, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lu J, Chen QY, Cao LL, Lin M, Tu RH, Li P, Huang CM. Low expression of CDK5RAP3 and DDRGK1 indicates a poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(34): 3898-3907