Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 14, 2018; 24(34): 3898-3907
Published online Sep 14, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i34.3898
Published online Sep 14, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i34.3898
Table 1 Relationship between CDK5RAP3 and DDRGK1 protein expression in gastric cancer tissues and various clinicopathological variables
Variables | Total | CDK5RAP3 expression | DDRGK1 expression | ||||||
Low | High | χ2 | P value | Low | High | χ2 | P value | ||
Gender | 1.659 | 0.198 | 3.057 | 0.080 | |||||
Male | 107 | 84 | 23 | 74 | 33 | ||||
Female | 28 | 25 | 3 | 24 | 4 | ||||
Age (yr) | 4.441 | 0.035 | 0.719 | 0.397 | |||||
> 60 | 91 | 78 | 13 | 64 | 27 | ||||
≤ 60 | 44 | 31 | 13 | 34 | 10 | ||||
Tumor size(cm) | 0.125 | 0.723 | 0.043 | 0.835 | |||||
> 5 | 53 | 42 | 11 | 39 | 14 | ||||
≤ 5 | 72 | 67 | 15 | 59 | 23 | ||||
Location of tumor | 3.860 | 0.277 | 1.537 | 0.674 | |||||
Lower 1/3 | 55 | 48 | 7 | 37 | 18 | ||||
Middle 1/3 | 20 | 15 | 5 | 16 | 4 | ||||
Upper 1/3 | 45 | 36 | 9 | 34 | 11 | ||||
More than 1/3 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 11 | 4 | ||||
Borrmann type | 0.285 | 0.593 | 1.312 | 0.252 | |||||
I + II Type | 31 | 24 | 7 | 25 | 6 | ||||
III + IV Type | 104 | 85 | 19 | 73 | 31 | ||||
Degree of differentiation | 0.187 | 0.666 | 4.414 | 0.036 | |||||
Well/moderate | 57 | 47 | 10 | 36 | 21 | ||||
Poor and not | 78 | 62 | 16 | 62 | 16 | ||||
Histological type | 1.271 | 0.736 | 8.547 | 0.036 | |||||
Papillary | 58 | 48 | 10 | 39 | 19 | ||||
Tubular | 42 | 32 | 10 | 27 | 15 | ||||
Mucinous | 10 | 9 | 1 | 9 | 1 | ||||
Signet-ring cell | 25 | 20 | 5 | 23 | 2 | ||||
Depth of invasion | 5.674 | 0.017 | 1.428 | 0.232 | |||||
T1 + T2 | 21 | 13 | 8 | 13 | 8 | ||||
T3 + T4 | 114 | 96 | 18 | 85 | 29 | ||||
Lymph node metastasis | 0.008 | 0.927 | 6.023 | 0.014 | |||||
Negative | 20 | 16 | 4 | 10 | 10 | ||||
Positive | 115 | 93 | 22 | 88 | 27 | ||||
TNM stage | 1.383 | 0.240 | 2.632 | 0.105 | |||||
I + II | 44 | 33 | 11 | 28 | 16 | ||||
III + IV | 91 | 76 | 15 | 70 | 21 | ||||
Distant metastasis | 1.761 | 0.184 | 0.639 | 0.424 | |||||
Negative | 128 | 102 | 26 | 92 | 36 | ||||
Positive | 7 | 7 | 0 | 6 | 1 |
Table 2 Relationship between different CDK5RAP3 and DDRGK1 protein expression status in gastric cancer tissues and various clinicopathological variables
Variables | Total | C53 and DDRGK1 low expression | C53 and/or DDRGK1 high expression | χ2 | P value |
Gender | |||||
Male | 107 | 59 | 48 | 5.077 | 0.024 |
Female | 28 | 22 | 6 | ||
Age (yr) | |||||
> 60 | 91 | 55 | 36 | 0.022 | 0.881 |
≤ 60 | 44 | 26 | 18 | ||
Tumor size (cm) | |||||
> 5 | 53 | 32 | 21 | 0.005 | 0.943 |
≤ 5 | 82 | 49 | 33 | ||
Location of tumor | |||||
Lower 1/3 | 55 | 33 | 22 | 1.481 | 0.687 |
Middle 1/3 | 20 | 12 | 8 | ||
Upper 1/3 | 45 | 29 | 16 | ||
More than 1/3 | 15 | 7 | 8 | ||
Borrmann type | |||||
I + II Type | 31 | 20 | 11 | 0.342 | 0.559 |
III + IV Type | 104 | 61 | 43 | ||
Degree of differentiation | |||||
Well/moderate | 57 | 31 | 26 | 1.296 | 0.255 |
Poor and not | 78 | 50 | 28 | ||
Histological type | |||||
Papillary | 57 | 33 | 25 | 4.415 | 0.220 |
Tubular | 42 | 22 | 20 | ||
Mucinous | 10 | 8 | 2 | ||
Signet-ring cell | 25 | 18 | 7 | ||
Depth of invasion | |||||
T1 + T2 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 4.972 | 0.026 |
T3 + T4 | 114 | 73 | 41 | ||
Lymph node metastasis | |||||
Negative | 20 | 8 | 12 | 3.913 | 0.048 |
Positive | 115 | 73 | 42 | ||
TNM stage | |||||
I + II | 44 | 20 | 24 | 5.754 | 0.016 |
III + IV | 91 | 61 | 30 | ||
Distant metastasis | |||||
Negative | 126 | 75 | 53 | 2.034 | 0.154 |
Positive | 7 | 6 | 1 |
Table 3 Univariate analysis of the correlation between clinicopathological parameters and survival of patients with gastric cancer
Clinicopathological parameters | Three-year cumulative survival rate | Log-rank test | P value |
Gender | |||
Male | 75.4 | 0.395 | 0.53 |
Female | 71.4 | ||
Age (yr) | |||
> 60 | 75.4 | 0.163 | 0.686 |
≤ 60 | 73.8 | ||
Tumor size (cm) | |||
> 5 | 68.3 | 0.988 | 0.32 |
≤ 5 | 79.3 | ||
Location of tumor | |||
Lower 1/3 | 78.2 | 3.438 | 0.329 |
Middle 1/3 | 83.6 | ||
Upper 1/3 | 63.3 | ||
More than 1/3 | 86.7 | ||
Borrmann type | |||
I + II | 76.9 | 0.373 | 0.541 |
III + IV | 74 | ||
Degree of differentiation | |||
Well/moderate | 75.5 | 0.111 | 0.739 |
Poor and not | 74.2 | ||
Histological type | |||
Papillary | 70 | 4.386 | 0.223 |
Tubular | 85.6 | ||
Mucinous | 70 | ||
Signet-ring cell | 69.1 | ||
Depth of invasion | |||
T1 + T2 | 91.7 | 4.95 | 0.026 |
T3 + T4 | 71.7 | ||
Lymph node metastasis | |||
Negative | 95 | 4.629 | 0.031 |
Positive | 71.2 | ||
TNM stage | |||
I + II | 92.3 | 11.424 | 0.001 |
III + IV | 66.3 | ||
Distant metastasis | |||
Negative | 76.7 | 8.015 | 0.005 |
Positive | 42.9 | ||
CDK5RAP3 expression | |||
Low | 71.1 | 5.168 | 0.023 |
High | 90.8 | ||
DDRGK1 expression | |||
Low | 67.7 | 5.971 | 0.015 |
High | 91.9 | ||
CDK5RAP3/DDRGK1 expression | |||
CDK5RAP3 and/or DDRGK1 high | 90.1 | 10.415 | 0.001 |
CDK5RAP3 and DDRGK1 low | 64.2 |
Table 4 Multivariate analysis of the correlation between clinicopathological parameters and survival time of patients with gastric cancer
Covariates | Coefficient | Standard error | HR | 95%CI for HR | P value |
CDK5RAP3 expression (high vs low) | -1.226 | 0.735 | 0.294 | 0.070-1.239 | 0.095 |
DDRGK1 expression (high vs. low) | -0.979 | 0.536 | 0.376 | 0.131-1.074 | 0.068 |
CDK5RAP3 and DDRGK1 expression (low/low vs. high and/or high) | 1.178 | 0.453 | 3.247 | 1.336-7.891 | 0.009 |
Depth of invasion (T3,T4 vs T1,T2) | 1.071 | 1.045 | 2.920 | 0.376-22.635 | 0.305 |
Lymph node metastasis (positive vs negative) | 1.538 | 1.020 | 1.974 | 0.631-34.367 | 0.132 |
Distant metastasis (positive vs negative) | 0.861 | 0.544 | 2.365 | 0.815-6.8631 | 0.113 |
TNM stage (stage III and IV vs I and II) | -1.630 | 0.608 | 7.195 | 0.060-0.645 | 0.007 |
- Citation: Lin JX, Xie XS, Weng XF, Zheng CH, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lu J, Chen QY, Cao LL, Lin M, Tu RH, Li P, Huang CM. Low expression of CDK5RAP3 and DDRGK1 indicates a poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(34): 3898-3907
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v24/i34/3898.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i34.3898