Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28, 2017; 23(44): 7906-7916
Published online Nov 28, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i44.7906
Published online Nov 28, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i44.7906
Ref. | Number of centers involved (country) in the RCT and in the study period | Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria | n | Surgical approach | Types of procedure | Preoperative treatment | ||||
Lap (n) | Conversion rate (%) | Open (n) | Lap (%) | Open (%) | Lap (%) | Open (%) | |||||
Fleshman et al[5], 2015 | 35 (United States-Canada) Oct 2008-Sep 2013 | S. II-III rectal cancer ≤ 12 cm from AV | 1-11 | 462 | 240 | 11.25 | 222 | LAR (74.6) APR (24.2) H (0.4) TPC (0.8) | AR (76.1) APR (21.2) TPC 6 (2.7) | CRT (95) RT (3.3) CT (1.7) | CRT (91.2) RT (5.5) CT (3.4) |
Stevenson et al[6], 2015 | 24 (Australia-N. Zeal) Mar 2010-Nov 2014 | T1-3 rectal cancer ≤ 15 cm from AV | 1, 2, 4, 7, 10, 12, 13 | 473 | 238 | 8.82 | 235 | LAR (89) APR (11) | AR (90) APR (10) | RT (50) | RT (49) |
Ng et al[20], 2014 | 1 (Hong Kong) Aug 2001-Aug2007 | Rectal cancer low margin 5-12 cm AV | 13, 16, 17, 23, 24, 25 | 80 | 40 | 7.5 | 40 | LAR (100) | AR (100) | 0 | 0 |
van der Pas et al[3], 2013 | 30 (Europe- Canada-South Korea) Jan 2004-May 2010 | T1-3 rectal cancer ≤ 15 cm from AV | 1, 2, 9, 10, 13-22 | 1044 | 699 | 16.4 | 345 | LAR (70) APR (29) U (1) | AR (77) APR (23) | RT (59) CT (32) | RT (58) CT (34) |
Liang et al[24], 2011 | 1 (China) May 2004-April 2008 | Rectal cancer | 16, 25, 26, 31, 34, 35 | 343 | 169 | 0.59 | 174 | LAR (50.9) APR (49.1) | AR (59.8) APR (40.2) | 0 | 0 |
Kang et al[4], 2010 | 3 (South Korea) Apr 2006-Aug 2009 | T1-3 rectal cancer ≤ 9 cm from AV | 1, 5, 10, 13, 16, 21, 23, 26 | 340 | 170 | 1.18 | 170 | LAR (85.9) APR (14.1) | AR (88.8) APR (11.2) | CRT (100) | CRT (100) |
Liu et al[18], 2010 | 1 (China) Feb 2005-Oct 2008 | Rectal cancer | 16, 17, 23 | 186 | 98 | 0 | 88 | 1LAR (69.4) H 14 (14.3) APR (12.2) O 4 (4.1) | AR (67) H (12.5) APR (15.9) O 4 (4.5) | 0 | 0 |
Ng et al[21], 2009 | 1 (Hong Kong) Sep 1993-Oct 2002 | Rectal cancer low margin 12-15 cm AV | 1, 16, 23, 24, 27, 28 | 153 | 76 | 30.26 | 77 | LAR (100) | AR (100) | 0 | 0 |
Luján et al[19], 2009 | 1 (Spain) Jan 2002-Feb 2007 | Mid or low rectal cancer | 1, 13, 18, 29 | 204 | 101 | 7.92 | 103 | LAR 77 (76.2) APR 24 (23.8) | AR (78.6) APR (21.4) | CRT (72.3) | CRT (74.8) |
Ng et al[22], 2008 | 1 (Hong Kong) Sep1994-Feb 2005 | Low rectal cancer | 13, 16, 23, 24, 30 | 99 | 51 | 9.8 | 48 | APR (100) | APR (100) | 0 | 0 |
Braga et al[17], 2007 | 1 (Italy) Period n.a. | Rectal cancer | 1, 2, 10, 13, 31 | 168 | 83 | 7.23 | 85 | LAR (91.6) APR (8.4) | AR (87) APR (13) | CRT (16.9) | CRT (14.1) |
Guillou et al[26], 2005 | 27 (United Kingdom) Jul 1996 - Jul 2002 | Colorectal cancer (excl. transverse) | 11, 16, 17, 21, 32, 33 | 381 | 253 | 33.88 | 128 | AR 167 (66) APR (25) S (3) LH (2) O (3) U (1) | AR (62) RC 1 (1) S 7 (5) APR (27) O 4 (3) U (2) | NA | NA |
Zhou et al[23], 2004 | 1 (China) Jun 2001 - Sep 2002 | 1.5 cm above AV to peritoneal reflection | 1, 13, 29 | 171[24] | 82 | na | 89 | LAR (100) | AR (100) | 0 | 0 |
Araujo et al[25], 2003 | 1 (Brazil) Sep 1997-Sep 2000 | Low rectal cancer not responding RCT | 1 | 28 | 13 | 0 | 15 | APR (100) | APR (100) | CRT (100) | CRT (100) |
Outcome variables | Number of studies (Number of patients) | RR or MD | 95%CI(Low; High) | P value | Heterogeneity, I2(P value) | Sensitivity analysis by including the largest multi-centric RCTs | ||||
Number of studies (Number of patients) | RR or MD | 95%CI (Low; High) | P value | Heterogeneity, I2 (P value) | ||||||
Intraoperative outcomes | ||||||||||
Operative time | 12 (3723) | 36.67 | 27.22; 46.11 | <0.00001 | 89% (< 0.00001) | 4 (2319) | 41.18 | 24.88; 57.48 | < 0.00001 | 85% (0.0002) |
Intraoperative morbidity | 4 (1909) | 0.97 | 0.74; 1.27 | 0.82 | 8% (0.35) | 2 (1500) | 1.02 | 0.60; 1.72 | 0.94 | 61% (0.11) |
Estimated blood loss | 11 (3380) | -88.8 | -117.25; -60.34 | < 0.00001 | 83% (< 0.00001) | 4 (2319) | -82.1 | -158.87; -5.34 | 0.04 | 94% (< 0.00001) |
Incision length | 5 (1629) | -11.17 | -13.88; -8.47 | < 0.00001 | 99% (< 0.00001) | 3 (1275) | -10.51 | -16.16; -4.85 | 0.0003 | 99% (< 0.00001) |
Ureter injury | 5 (2256) | 1.23 | 0.20; 7.72 | 0.82 | 51% (0.11) | 2 (1500) | 2.59 | 0.66; 10.11 | 0.17 | 0% (0.67) |
Gastrointestinal injury | 4 (2052) | 1.14 | 0.25; 5.17 | 0.86 | 73% (0.02) | 2 (1500) | 1.05 | 0.13; 8.22 | 0.96 | 86% (0.007) |
Postoperative outcomes | ||||||||||
Postoperative morbidity | 12 (3313) | 0.98 | 0.88; 1.09 | 0.75 | 16% (0.3) | 3 (1844) | 1.02 | 0.91; 1.15 | 0.69 | 0% (0.65) |
Postoperative mortality | 13 (3751) | 0.65 | 0.34; 1.23 | 0.19 | 0% (1) | 4 (2319) | 0.60 | 0.27; 1.33 | 0.21 | 0% (0.89) |
Length hospital stay | 12 (3738) | -1.71 | -2.84; -0.58 | 0.003 | 90% (< 0.00001) | 4 (2296) | -0.25 | -0.90; 0.39 | 0.44 | 52% (0.10) |
Anastomotic leak | 9 (2253) | 0.97 | 0.69; 1.34 | 0.84 | 0% (0.6) | 3 (1351) | 1.19 | 0.79; 1.80 | 0.41 | 0% (0.53) |
Reoperation rate | 7 (2468) | 0.93 | 0.64; 1.34 | 0.69 | 3% (0.4) | 3 (1844) | 1.19 | 0.77; 1.86 | 0.43 | 0% (0.42) |
Ileus | 10 (2930) | 0.77 | 0.55; 1.06 | 0.11 | 0% (0.66) | 3 (1875) | 0.79 | 0.43; 1.44 | 0.44 | 62% (0.07) |
Bowel recovery | 9 (3149) | -0.68 | -1.00; -0.36 | < 0.0001 | 79% (< 0.00001) | 3 (1922) | -0.59 | -1.24; 0.07 | 0.08 | 87% (0.0005) |
Wound infection | 10 (2684) | 0.81 | 0.61; 1.09 | 0.16 | 0% (0.5) | 1 (1042) | 0.82 | 0.43;1.47 | 0.5 | NA |
Chest infection | 7 (1252) | 1.55 | 0.82; 2.93 | 0.17 | 0% (0.61) | 0 (0) | - | - | - | - |
Urinary infection | 7 (1075) | 0.89 | 0.50; 1.57 | 0.68 | 15% (0.32) | 0 (0) | - | - | - | - |
- Citation: Martínez-Pérez A, Carra MC, Brunetti F, de’Angelis N. Short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic vs open rectal excision for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(44): 7906-7916
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i44/7906.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i44.7906